So far this season Salah has only been absent once against Leicester, Salah's absence is due to injury but the final result is Liverpool still winning the match 3-0. When Liverpool lost big against Aston Villa 7-2 in reality Virgil van Dijk was still playing and it was Liverpool's first defeat this season in PL. So, I'm not sure if Virgil van Dijk is a factor for Liverpool's inconsistency, as there are a lot of injured players including new player Thiago Alcantara which I think is really welcome.

Unfortunately not everyone is health conscious, when people are tired of facing this pandemic, they have the courage to go against all the regulations that have been made by the government such as health protocols etc. That way, economic improvement does not always wait for the government because the people will be more aware of financial and other economic improvements, so that the economy will always be strived to remain good and balanced because it will be done all the time.

Don't know when that will be achieved but at least with bitcoin it can continue to be useful for a long time, I think that's enough because it will also continue to make the price go up. If more adoption will make a more stable price, maybe $500 can be reached in the next bull run, but if the volatility is very high then to reach that first target I think it's still difficult because market behavior is not always positive.

Because even if you are a person who has at least the knowledge and experience, that doesn't guarantee you will continue to make a profit on the same percentage every time. Indeed, this is all uncertain and every analysis or prediction that is carried out even if there are good and correct predictions, it will not produce a definite value but at least with you having the knowledge and experience it will make the possible value can be achieved even if it is only close.

Yes, the price is very expensive and for the community down to the poor it seems that it will not be able to, but it depends on the government, will there be a policy that will at least ease the community even though it is still not free. Vaccines are made not only to reduce the spread, because with the vaccine at least our bodies will become immune to the virus. This is no longer a precautionary measure and they won't be careless about releasing the vaccine itself, so with a lot of effort and clinical trials that have been done, at least I believe the vaccine will be good because it has gone through a lot of trial and research.

Even though it's good for Cambodia but with still a lot of controversy about gambling itself in other countries, then I think each rule will always have differences regarding gambling in each country. Having them set a favorite zone is a good thing because then at least gambling can be more controlled by the government. I'm not sure taxes will make many people avoid gambling, so it doesn't seem like a tax issue because what's important is the rules with clear laws about gambling itself.

Betting small amounts on a lot of matches is basically still profitable but unfortunately, you have to win a lot of matches and if only a few games win then you still lose. Options like this basically depend on your financial condition as well, because when I can't spend a lot of money on a bet then at least I will start that way. So I think that is part of the adjustment because we don't always gamble the same way.

Even though the increase occurred, in fact the price is still far below the previous ATH but yes, that is not the reason for XRP not being able to penetrate its new ATH in the future. With a new token from a new project being developed, of course, whether there is this or not, I personally really believe that XRP can keep up with the development of the existing market competition, so that to hit its new ATH in the future it will happen and we just need to be patient because even me Personally, I still hodl XRP because I believe the price will be a bull run.

Bitcoin is an influential coin so even if you convert it or move some bitcoin to a coin below it, it still won't touch the moon because if bitcoin is still struggling to hit its ATH again then its price won't go any higher. Instead of liquidating bitcoin, it would be better to start with a separate capital because that is the best way not to become a major investment in bitcoin being destroyed.

I really didn't have such thoughts because honestly, I was also a smoker before but I have decided to quit starting last February until now I have stopped smoking for at least 10 months. With me quitting smoking at least I just think if this is my way to save money and also, to maintain and restore health. But by reading your thread, there is at least a hint of regret that I really didn't think of turning to bitcoin investing from quitting smoking and maybe getting started on my own. Hopefully I can imitate your big and kind steps.

The only thing there is is a limit on the maximum bet profit and or something like that. After all, have you had such a big win that you didn't get paid or something like that? Because as far as I know a lot of users here are gambling large amounts of money and they still seem to be doing well. That way, if you are profitable in the long run I don't think it will matter because how can the gambling platforms suspend your account just because you continue to make profits, it's not just you who are gambling because there are many other bettors who are gambling on the same platform, they are definitely will experience win and lose.

Not sure if bitcoin and other cryptos are taking over the function of fiat, as even banks are continuing to carry out their own transformations by customizing digital transactions. That way, transactions with physical contact can still be avoided with digital payments. The bad impact or not caused by the pandemic for the bitcoin market remains and cannot be avoided, if you reminded it in last March at least it was the panic in the bitcoin market. There will always be good and bad repercussions from every situation that occurs, I'm just not sure whether the increase that happened at the end of this year was due to the pandemic or not, because even the value of any asset recovered at the end of this year and not just about bitcoin market.

Agree, trading at the high resistance line will be very risky but if the price has exceeded 20k even though it is unstable I don't think it is a problem to stay but yes, all decisions go back to the individual. This is a moment where the price will continue to be pushed upwards but the decline will still be inevitable and with that, I think the most important thing is to be patient because the price still has a chance to go higher. I don't know if this market collapse will be the last correction to finally break through ATH, or maybe this is a fall that will be very painful, be careful.

If you pay attention, the two early matches did not produce a profit, even if he made a single bet. Lokomotiv Moscow (2), the final result is 2-0 Munich wins and means the bet (push). Monchengladbach (1), the end result is 2-0 Madrid win and means the bet is clear (lose).

---

Then, OP makes a new bet with an Over-Under bet but look at the odds there.
I'm just wondering what odds are you looking for, because when you only choose odds of 1.1x, 1.2x then it can be said to be a safe bet but strangely, you are still entering odds of 1.5x, 1.9x and I don't think there's a strategy that you apply there, maybe can be say you only make random bets. Be careful because it is a gambling habit that you should change.

I just found out that, to be honest before that I thought that European countries were the countries that gambled the most but according to these data, at least the Asian states were still at the top. But indeed, European states still dominate and that is not surprising to me, because even gambling marketing and advertising in Europe can be said to be easy to find.

I once read one of the threads on this forum that he has been holding bitcoin for a long time and even when bitcoin hit the moon in 2017 he didn't sell it, too bad I forgot who he was. Anyway, those who have been consistent in holding on to bitcoin so far are something great and I really appreciate it, because to hold on for the long term is very difficult and not something easy. Well, in life we don't know when we will experience any disaster or problem that will require large and fast funds, and when they still prioritize their investment then they are the real holders and / or investors.

After all, that means it's a matter of belief or religion so I don't think it has anything to do with crypto dead or living forever. If this is about the existence of crypto for a long time or not then the factor is not only in terms of religion, at least there are many other factors such as market wars and other powers. I just don't agree when religion is the source of the problem because of the weapons transactions, because in the end the war will also happen again and if so, it seems that not only crypto will die.

If you convert crypto to gold or real estate during a bearish or dumping period then still, you will lose money because for me it would be better to stay holding. This is an era where crypto will continue to grow, so any decline will eventually recover and be bullish. So, why panic when this crypto era is in a good situation, it's different if this is an era where crypto is easy to replace or something else negative, then clearly a holding strategy will not be right to be implemented.

Yes, PSG has indeed been confirmed to qualify, even I am sure when the three teams still have the same 9 points. Given this incident I'm not sure whether PSG will continue to aim for the win, or just simply end the game with a draw. I personally placed a bet yesterday, so today will just go on and no need to make a new bet, but that depends on your own but with the incidents at least I'm really not sure PSG will win with a high score, because my bet yesterday was PSG -2.5 @1.66 and I'm not sure about that.

Yes I agree about the most important thing you said and also, the attached image of the map already shows an increase that more governments are legalizing and accepting bitcoin. Adoption like anything is done as long as cryptocurrency can be accepted by the wider community then of course that is a way in which cryptocurrency will last and can be used for a long time. Indeed, this has become a shift or changed from its original purpose, but if its use provides a lot of efficiency and benefits then the shift about cryptocurrency itself I don't think is a problem either.