Como é a relação entre a cotação utilizada por eles e a das exchanges? R$ 3,90 é pouco se você levar em conta a taxa de ordem e saque da maioria das exchanges. Só temos que ver se não tem nenhuma "taxa" escondida (quando eles botam uma cotação inferior pra que seu BTC renda menos).

Seu trust score agora (com o DT) é: Trust:   +1 / =0 / -2

O "trust" não tem mais tanto efeito, já que agora tem as "flags"; Ninguém criou uma flag na sua conta, então isso é tudo.

I like using https://any.run/ to check for files. It gives you more understanding on what the file does than VirusTotal.

It basically deploys a temporary VM so you can run the file and see what it is doing (which files is creating, what HTTP requests it is doing, etc...). You can actually grab a lot of information from it.

VirusTotal is cool too, but it is more about checking for heuristics instead of trully analysing the software.

I believe that's what the old system (which is still there) is for.

I don't see how merit abusing can fit on any of the flag types. Unless you believe it equals to "anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money" or "user violated a [...] contract with me";

And here you are, 16 posts just today in a cryptocurrency - blockchain technology - forum. You must have a great life, huh?

Go FUD somewhere else, bud.

---

OP: "is Facebook equal to internet"?

There is an "What is the expected lifetime of the device?" section on their FAQ, which says:

Source: https://opendime.com/faq

If it breaks before that date, your coins are most likely gone.

Mine doesn't show that. But it's crazy that from your screenshot, it just highlights the number as if it's legit.

You can report these kind of maliscious websites here: https://safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_badware

If you prefer quality, then why are you suggesting him to put a minimum amount of posts per week? 40/week is a pretty big number for many people, and this will only incentive them to spam up to the minimum so they can get paid.

Eveything or at least the amount they can cover with the SAFU (increases every day with 10% of what they receive from trading fees).

30 activity e 1 merit pra virar Jr. Member e poder postar imagens.

True, but apparently he is still part of the company (possible still as the CEO) - at least according to his Linkedin profile[1].


I can't say how accurate that is tho.

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/tristan-d-agosta-0a4529172/

Apparently they do. This is Poloniex's owner: busoni

He already has 2 *old trust* tags from Lauda and Zepher from 2017. Maybe someone should "update it" with a flag.

I'm not sure about this website, but the signature from "Bitcoin Core Code Signing Association" is legit.

But still, don't trust. Verify. You can verify the file signature yourself: https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/ (see section "Verify your download")

Tem 3 tipos de flags, que eu gosto de chamar de:

Tipo 1: Warning flag
Tipo 2: Scammer flag 1
Tipo 3: Scammer flag 2

O tipo 1 pode ser criado por qualquer pessoa que ache que o usuário em questão não deve ser confiado e que negociações com esse usuário podem resultar na perda de dinheiro. Esse tipo de flag só aparece (no caso, a mensagem "warning" no topo da trust page do usuário) para Newbies com menos de 7 dias logados (aquele tempinho do lado do seu avatar no topo da página) ou "guests" (usuários não logados). E não conta para o trust score do usuário.

O tipo 2 e 3 só podem ser criados caso você tenha sido vitima do usuário em especifico. Isso significa que se alguém roubar outro usuário, apenas a vitima pode criar esses tipos de flag. Ela aparece para todo mundo, deixa o !!! e o "Warning: trade with extreme caution" no trust score do usuário e a mensagem vermelha gritante para todos no topo da trust page dele.

Qualquer usuário pode se colocar a favor ou contra de qualquer flag (incluindo a 2 e 3), porém apenas usuários DT1 e DT2 contam para a votação da flag. No caso, caso haja mais votos DT1/DT2 a favor, a flag fica ativa e é mostrada. Caso tenham mais DT1/DT2 contra, ela ficara inativa e não será mostrado os avisos.

Agora o trust antigo (aquele do feedback) tem menos efeito, e por isso pode ser utilizado em mais casos que não envolvam um scam em específico (não que isso já não acontecesse... mas agora é mais "legal" fazer isso).

They expire after 3 or 10 years after the incident (based on the type of the flag).


This specific test flag's "incident date" is May 2016.

So, 3 years after the incident (May 2019 in this case) the flag would have expired.

No. I can think of possible 2 solutions here.

1) Backup your wallet file (at %appdata/Electrum/wallets - for preventive measures) and download the latest version of Electrum. It will try to convert your wallet file to the newest formats and you will be able to connect to the servers.

2) If your wallet file doesn't work on the newest version of Electrum (for some reason), you can try creating a watch-only version of your wallet, building a transaction, sending it to the old version Electrum for signining and broadcast it manually. That's an harder solution, so try out the first one and if it doesn't work, we can try this one.

This mixer is selective scamming ffs. Stop using it.

If any of you guys that got scammed by them want to create a flag against his acc (to avoid other people getting scammed by him), go here and follow the steps choose either the option 2 or 3): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;addflag=44692

Then post the link here so I support it.

Use the direct link instead of the inactive flags page url: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=78

According to theymos instructions, only someone that got scammed by him or bustabit (since he's using his script without a license) can add the type 2 and 3 flags. So all you can do is give him the flag that only shows up to newbies and guests.

Ask devans (bustabit's owner) to add him a flag. Then you can support it.