Hast es ja nötig </sarkasmus>


Mal über nen Anwalt (Schweigepflicht) oder Steuerberater nachgedacht?


Wie? Geld einsammeln geht, aber wenn Du Deinen Teil leisten sollst...


Super, immer schön übers eigene Konto laufen lassen, dann sind deine Sorgen bald vorbei.


Quatsch, hast Du mal ernsthaft versucht ein Gewerbeschein zu bekommen?


Gut, haste Deinen Pass schon abgegeben? Vorsicht die Straße ist auch Eigentum des Staates, kannste deinen 7er gleich in der Garage lassen. Und wenn mal was ist, nicht die Polizei, Feuerwehr rufen! Wenn Du das wenigstens ernst meinen würdest und ernsthaft Deine Staatsbürgerschaft abgeben würdest, hätte ich respekt. So, seh ich nur einen asozialen der nimmt aber nichts gibt.

There are allways explanations why bitcoin is rising or why bitcoin is falling. A lot of them involve china.
Tradevolume of darkcoins are not higher than usual so I doubt the raise of bitcoin has anything to do with darkcoin.

http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/period-charts.php?period=5-days&resolution=hour&pair=drk-btc&market=cryptsy


I like alots

A 51% attack is usually understood as a person or group (lets call he/she/them A) having 51% of the available hashing power. Most cryptocurrencies work with a blockchain where the longest chain is the valid one. So if you make a transaction and spend 10 LTC/BTC/whatevercoin but have the hashing power to revert this transaction by making a new longer chain that does not include said transaction, you can double spend coins. A could spend coins everywhere and when A got what was paid for, just "revoke" the coins, which usually is not possible. Even with 51% it is not allways possible. Finding a block is allways also a matter of chance and not only of pure hashingpower. With every "legit" block you have to find another "malicous" block. But there have been small (low overall hashingpower) altcoins that have been destroyed this way. Some big miners even consider it a good deed to destroy "pump and dump" coins.
With "the big" coins there is a major argument against a possible 51% attack. This would devalue the coin and thus reduce the usefullness. Think about the money youd have to spend to gather 51% of the Bitcoin hashingpower. This "investment" would probably never pay off.
Overall I dont think that any major coin will suffer a 51% attack any time soon.

What was the error message?
Could it be that the two passwords did not match?
Whats the message when you try to unlock?

Login counts towards the 360 seconds. So you have to wait 6 minutes after login for your first post.

If you want to see new topics from a subboard, do:

Watchlist -> Watch board -> Enter Board ID (e.g. Technical Support (ID 4)) -> klick Watch Board

Now every now post will end up on your Watchlist. If you dont want to follow that certain post any longer you have to "unwatch" it manually.

For the whole forum you can either use

or put all subboards on your watchlist.

Start the resourcemonitor and start bitcoin core afterwards. That might give you a hint. Might be low RAM, slow HDD.

Check Help -> Debug Window -> Network Traffic
There should be plenty of green. You can also check in the Information tab the current number of blocks and the estimated number of blocks

If you dont get any new blocks for several minutes try adding a node from this list https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Fallback_Nodes or this https://blockchain.info/connected-nodes
with in the Console tab.

Did you try turning it off and on again? Sometimes that helps.
Also check if you are actually downloading anything.

You should try your best to understand "them".


There is no race of "people that speak english at a level that bluefirecorp is happy with". No reason to be elitist or a grammarnazi either.

Bitcoin is international, so is this board. English is the major language of international communication. You should be happy that it isnt chinese or russian. Think about it the other way around. There is this massiv bitcoin place, where everyone is hanging out and 90% of them speak chinese, but you dont. What would you do? Would you go to the "english subforum" with ~3 posts daily or would you try to get along as best as you can with the little chinese you learned in school?

Your stats smell like you "only" speak english. You should be grateful that so many people all around the world learn your native language.

looks like you are missing an -j ACCEPT here.

Tipp: If you are affraid of DDoS you could modify this

http://togami.com/~warren/archive/2013/example-bitcoind-dos-mitigation-via-iptables.txt

Its a nice way to limit connections from a certain IP range.

Just keep the most valueable stuff to your Linux system. Use Windows for entertainment, non critical uses.


No, Anti Virus software is dead. No matter what they tell you, they can only react to what is allready known. Most modern attacks use 0-days and thus no software can protect you against it. Keep the number of tool you use low and maintain them well. I personally use a simple free anti virus kit for windows. Its enough to catch the old stuff, but I rely on beeing carefull not on some "magical tool" that cant help me in most cases anyway.

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/06/antivirus-software-fails-catch-attacks-security-expert-symantec


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lmy1Skg3wdE - speech about Zeus, one of things youd want to protect against. The maintainers of Zeus probably have better support than most "premium" anti virus software.

Yes it is normal for networks to become unusable when a single service is to demanding.

"Normal" people dont open ports. By opening a port you say: "Hello Internet I am a Server now, please enjoy your stay". You should be aware of this. There might be lot of "internet" coming your way. Well, you ask for it by opening the port.
Most ISPs give you the worst possible router. If you are lucky you can just make a DMZ and forward all traffic to your actual router that knows how to handle traffic. Sometimes the hardware is fine, so you just need new software (e.g. OpenWRT), but depending on the country you life in, that might be illegal. Sometimes you want to build your own router (see fli4l) or just invest a little in a good router (a linksys wrt54gl still does amazing work).

The bitcoin core software works correctly out of the box, noone asked you to open your port and configure your router to forward traffic. While its nice that you want to support the network, it can be demanding. So -as sugested- either stop supporting (close port) or shape traffic (QoS etc., proper router, local solution)


It took them years. I dont use bittorrent anymore, but I have been around when you couldnt even get your mails because a single user in your network had a bittorrent client running for over 1 hour. And that was on a 2MBit/s connection when most peopl still had dial up connections. Bittorrent used to kill routers because of the number of connections and clog up the network without proper QoS. Many modern BT clients support some form of bandwith limitation because otherwise noone would use them. In every home network I managed for the past 10 years you "felt" when someone turned on the bittorrent client. Even with QoS bittorent is hard to handle when you still want VoIP and gaming, because you can only shape the traffic in your network, not the responses from the internet.


As I said above, most ISPs wont even give you a router that is able (by software) to do QoS. But imho it is also not realistic to expect the average bitcoiner to setup a server and open ports.

Try adding a node by hand. Here is a list of known nodes: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Fallback_Nodes

Edit: also open 8333 TCP, not UDP

reading the sticky might help... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=177133.0

Its 1338 now, maybe because it was 1337 and theymos has a little joke in the counter?

So basically you do something for the network (not just downloading, but also uploading) and you complain about it? Its perfectly normal behaviour if someone needs to download old blocks (or even the whole blockchain). If that makes your internet connection unusable you might want to use QoS (quality of service) or other form of traffic shaping on your router. Limiting bitcoin core's outgoing traffic to a low priority and upto 80% of your bandwith should do the trick.

A TX is considered "not on chain" or "off chain" when its just internal. If you have an account with company X and they hold 3 BTC for you. I have one there as well and want to send you 2 BTC they can just change the BTC in my account by -2 and yours by +2. Just by changing an internal spreadsheet or database. If you now want to transfer 5 BTC from.company X to your private wallet there must be an "on chain" (as in stored on the blockchain) TX.

Where do you get this knowledge? Do you have 1 single example?

Its not like spamming trust is not a topic in meta allready https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=558001.0