Working fine for me.Do you get an exception when the App is opened ? Check out their github page and see if your issue is already listed there,if not ,create a new request.
I'm not getting any exception , this is all I have :  No matter how I changes the settings and I click "Retry connection" , I still have the same message that says "Unable to connect ...." |
|
|
|
I'm interested in OpenBazaar also. Any info would be appreciated.
What kind of information's are you looking for ? I personally have a bug , If you want to download the software then simply visit OpenBazaar.org |
|
|
|
Craig Wright is a good fit to pass for Satoshi, with the right skill-set and a mysterious twist in his personality to be the creator of Bitcoin. If I had to make a bet, I'd bet he is Satoshi.
For someone who created something revolutionary I'd say he is a retard honestly , I also didn't buy that "I don't want fame , I don't want money" crap ... If he don't want fame then why showing in front of camera in the first place ? |
|
|
|
|
At least mention what forum is that ,seriously .
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure who this Crypthacker is but I somehow believe him. Who have some information's about who is this guy ? http://pastebin.com/6TAyryqH |
|
|
|
|
I'm still having this issue , anyone guys ?
|
|
|
|
Moving some bitcoins should proof something , no ?  |
|
|
|
See how Andreas M. Antonopoulos got contacted ( https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hj1xu/why_i_declined_to_verify_sns_identity_two_weeks/ ) :
About two weeks ago I was contacted and asked to offer security advice for a project. I was asked to sign an NDA in order to discuss the project itself, something I am reluctant to do, in general. Once I received the NDA however, it became obvious that the project was related to verifying the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto. I immediately declined the offer, declined to participate and declined to sign the NDA.
I'm sure many people will think I was wrong to decline the "opportunity" to verify SN's identity. From my perspective, the request for me to verify his/her/their identity is in itself an appeal to authority. It is replacing public cryptographic proof with endorsement by a third party. If SN wants to "prove" their identity, they don't need an "authority" to do so. They can do it in a public, open manner. To ask people in the space who have a reputation to stake that reputation and vouch for SN's identity raises many red flags in my mind.
I don't know if Craig Wright is SN. I don't care and I don't want to know.
As I have expressed many times in the past, I think the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto does not matter. More importantly I think it serves to distract from the fact that bitcoin is not controlled by anyone and is not a system of Appeal-to-Authority. Identifying the creator only serves to feed the appeal-to-authority crowd, as if SN is some kind of infallible prophet, or has any say over bitcoin's future.
Identity and authority are distractions from a system of mathematical proof that does not require trust. This is not a telenovela. Bitcoin is a neutral framework of trust that can bring financial empowerment to billions of people. It works because it doesn't depend on any authority. Not even Satoshi's.
Back to work.
|
|
|
|
This shit is going worldwide guys. It's sad (since it's probably fake).  |
|
|
|
|
Till now I don't understand what he provided as evidence , He only showed to the reporter from BBC (wondering if he knows anything about Cryptography) but BBC didn't post anything like signed message or something on the article .
I'm not sure if this Craig guy is dumb or something because he should know that no one is going to believe him unless he provide a signed message from one of his addresses .
So I personally want to see him signing a message + connect to his Bitcointalk forum account .
|
|
|
|
If he really is , he would proof it then disappear or do whatever he wants as he said . (I guess he said he won't speak to the media again and he don't want any money or any Nobel prize  ) so I personally don't buy it . He could at least connect to his forum account to proof little something (even if it's hackable ). |
|
|
|
|
BBC are retards or something ? why they didn't us how he "signed" a message using one of his addresses ?
|
|
|
|
|
Holly ....
Now this is some interesting shit there , He said on the BBC video : "I'm the one behind it and other people helped me" . I suppose this means they was a group after all
|
|
|
|
So let's assume that each member of the parliament gets about 1btc each and somehow people start adopting btc... does that mean the btc might sell for $500 this year, or am I just being too optimistic?
It's going to reach that price without members of the parliament buying anything . It will rise because of the halving block reward however ... them speaking about Bitcoin will make it more popular . |
|
|
|
Oh yea I get the basic jist of it, however I'm looking for the hardcore data within this.
Such as hardware walllets or similar things that's included.
If we are speaking about individuals then most of the time they hold funds in online or desktop wallets , as for Bitrated I'm not really sure but It should be something similar since they send the funds to the other party once the transaction is finished (in few minutes). So no , as far as I know they don't use hardware wallets . |
|
|
|
There isn't anything left to say after that Quicky's (QS) post. P.S.-> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1442105.0 . You'll get most probably all the bugs of the beta over that thread.
However, it isn't a good idea to discuss about the beta bugs(giving feedbacks about the beta) here 'coz there's already a thread in the beta forum about that & posting there 'll be the best idea IMHO. I posted my link on the Meta and Lauda suggested to post on the new Beta forum instead or the Github so I will be closing this topic . ty |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
