<...>
Esta es la lista de las personas que han obtenido más de 1000 méritos (sin contar el airdrop inicial): ProbableInitialRank rank name posts activity merit meritreceived meritsent url
Full Member Hero Member Steamtyme 3227 784 1210 1108 555 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1112531
Full Member Hero Member o_e_l_e_o 4350 700 2766 2666 1562 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1188543
Full Member Hero Member xtraelv 2059 812 1354 1254 615 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=897509
Full Member Legendary micgoossens 11542 826 2600 2500 2198 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1067333
Hero Member Legendary TMAN 5394 1274 1554 1054 4809 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=98986
Hero Member Legendary hilariousetc 3304 1358 2196 1696 717 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=397737
Hero Member Legendary Last of the V8s 7259 1246 2340 1840 989 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=479624
Hero Member Legendary Jet Cash 6641 1386 1752 1252 2004 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=698159
Hero Member Legendary marlboroza 5944 1330 1632 1132 779 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=787736
Hero Member Legendary HCP 6596 1092 1797 1297 610 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=867786
Hero Member Legendary Hhampuz 8299 1176 1711 1211 693 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=881377
Hero Member Legendary TryNinja 6096 1148 1504 1001 406 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=557798
Legendary Administrator theymos 8667 3528 6269 5269 1418 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=35
Legendary Donator qwk 6258 2254 2156 1156 4980 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=24140
Legendary Legendary JayJuanGee 17611 2030 2034 1034 3497 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=252510
Legendary Legendary The Pharmacist 11319 1652 3099 2099 1813 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=487418
Legendary Legendary LoyceV 10158 1624 4654 3654 6258 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=459836
Legendary Legendary ETFbitcoin 3256 1778 2038 1038 2361 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=359716
Legendary Legendary LFC_Bitcoin 13960 1848 2126 1126 2325 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=379487
Legendary Legendary xhomerx10 5473 2156 2300 1300 848 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=120694
Legendary Legendary suchmoon 17384 2086 4000 2995 18963 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=234771
Legendary Legendary Lauda 25336 2352 2123 1123 635 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=101872
Legendary Legendary Vod 17832 2884 2305 1305 4364 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=30747
Legendary Legendary nutildah 6291 1526 2321 1321 1069 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=317618
Legendary Legendary DarkStar_ 5320 1470 2020 1020 4122 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=507936
Legendary Staff gmaxwell 5045 2828 2419 1419 207 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=11425
Legendary Staff achow101 11213 1904 2750 1749 857 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=290195
Member Hero Member BitCryptex 1350 714 1023 1013 476 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1169179
Member Hero Member joniboini 3461 700 1111 1101 1281 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1275282
Member Hero Member iasenko 2945 700 1222 1212 607 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1291828
Member Hero Member coinlocket$ 4949 686 1075 1065 363 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1339716
New Era Newbie Sr. Member VB1001 2216 364 1005 1004 460 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1138727
Old Era Newbie Hero Member bitmover 3197 616 1041 1041 504 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554927
Old Era Newbie Hero Member DdmrDdmr 3225 630 2711 2711 2960 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1582324
Old Era Newbie Hero Member abhiseshakana 1401 546 1340 1340 641 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1878246
Old Era Newbie Hero Member mikeywith 2750 546 1227 1227 613 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2033515
Old Era Newbie Hero Member 1miau 1316 504 1371 1371 683 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2143453
Old Era Newbie Sr. Member fillippone 2028 476 1169 1169 579 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1852120
Sr. Member Founder satoshi 575 364 2168 1918 0 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3
Sr. Member Hero Member Piggy 4629 784 1381 1131 538 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=188198
Sr. Member Hero Member HairyMaclairy 7181 966 1608 1355 681 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=181806
Sr. Member Hero Member krogothmanhattan 6760 882 1479 1229 1823 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1000199
Sr. Member Legendary bob123 4397 1036 1539 1289 484 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=579628
Los que pides son los newbies de la columna primera: "Old Era Newbie" (primer mérito < 17/09/2018) o "New Era Newbie" (primer mérito >= 17/09/2018). |
|
|
|
Previsiones hay de todo tipo, la mayor parte de ellas interesadas supongo, realizadas por técnicos o demi-dioses sabedores de que sus tweets mueven el mercado a corto, mientras que crean un fud de duración más larga en la esperanza de un precio soñado. Si quieres ver una de las primera (si no la primera), aquí la tienes: Hal Finney ya especulaba hace 10 años con que 1 BTC llegaría a los 10M$Bitcoin v0.1 released Hal Finney hal at finney.org Sat Jan 10 21:22:01 EST 2009 • Previous message: feds try to argue touch tone content needs no wiretap order • Next message: What risk is being defended against here? • Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] ________________________________________ Satoshi Nakamoto writes: > Announcing the first release of Bitcoin, a new electronic cash > system that uses a peer-to-peer network to prevent double-spending. > It's completely decentralized with no server or central authority. > > See bitcoin.org for screenshots. > > Download link: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/bitcoin/bitcoin-0.1.0.rarCongratulations to Satoshi on this first alpha release. I am looking forward to trying it out. > Total circulation will be 21,000,000 coins. It'll be distributed > to network nodes when they make blocks, with the amount cut in half > every 4 years. > > first 4 years: 10,500,000 coins > next 4 years: 5,250,000 coins > next 4 years: 2,625,000 coins > next 4 years: 1,312,500 coins > etc... It's interesting that the system can be configured to only allow a certain maximum number of coins ever to be generated. I guess the idea is that the amount of work needed to generate a new coin will become more difficult as time goes on. One immediate problem with any new currency is how to value it. Even ignoring the practical problem that virtually no one will accept it at first, there is still a difficulty in coming up with a reasonable argument in favor of a particular non-zero value for the coins. As an amusing thought experiment, imagine that Bitcoin is successful and becomes the dominant payment system in use throughout the world. Then the total value of the currency should be equal to the total value of all the wealth in the world. Current estimates of total worldwide household wealth that I have found range from $100 trillion to $300 trillion. With
20 million coins, that gives each coin a value of about $10 million. So the possibility of generating coins today with a few cents of compute time may be quite a good bet, with a payoff of something like 100 million to 1! Even if the odds of Bitcoin succeeding to this degree are slim, are they really 100 million to one against? Something to think about... Hal Nota: Obsérvese como Hal da por descontados 1M de BTCs de los 21M. Posiblemente, los que se minaron de entrada por parte de Satoshi fuesen mayoritariamente destinados a no ponerse en circulación por un motivo u otro. BTC tiene vida por delante, pero nadie puede prever con certeza la dirección, intensidad y sostenibilidad de sus movimientos, sean bajistas o alcistas, máxime cuando hay factores de enorme peso que deben entrar en juego con más énfasis en algún momento dado (regulación, celeridad de las TXs, usabilidad, dinero institucional, casos de usos con entidades "evangelizadoras", competencia, etc.). |
|
|
|
<…>
La campaña que citas entiendo que es ésta: CryptoTalk.Org Signature Campaign [Yobit Panel]. Como verás en los requerimientos de la campaña, has de tener el rango de Sr. Member en adelante, por lo que no cualificas en estos momentos. Uno puede tener una firma desde el momento que es Jr. Member (o bien comprando un Copper Membership). Los tamaños de las firmas (y algunas cosas más) varían según el rango. Es decir, puedes tener firma con rangos inferiores, pero esta campaña requiere rangos medios/altos. Comentar que Yobit ha tenido históricamente mala reputación en el foro en sus campañas. En la anterior a la vigente, se pasó tres pueblos aceptando a todo el mundo y no controlando el desarrollo de la campaña, produciéndose un repunte de spam que llevó a la dirección del foro a banear la campaña durante 60 días si no recuerdo mal, y a muchos de los portadores de la firma a tener baneos temporales (e incluso permanentes si su spam individual era de entidad). Esta campaña la empezaron de una manera similar, pero han reaccionado a tiempo y han contratado un gestor de la campaña (@yahoo62278), el cual es muy experimentado y vela por unos mínimos de calidad en los posts de las campañas que gestiona. De hecho, en esta campaña ya ha echado a varias personas por no tener calidad en sus contenidos. En todo caso, te dejo los requisitos de los rangos, pero como verás, es una tarea a medio plazo llegar a Sr. Member (mínimo 8 meses - ver Merit & new rank requirements): In addition to activity, everyone now has a merit score, and you need both a certain activity level and a certain merit score in order to reach higher member ranks. The required scores are: | Rank | Required activity | Required merit | | Brand new | 0 | 0 | | Newbie | 1 | 0 | | Jr Member | 30 | 1 | | Member | 60 | 10 | | Full Member | 120 | 100 | | Sr. Member | 240 | 250 | | Hero Member | 480 | 500 | | Legendary | Random in the range 775-1030 | 1000 |
|
|
|
|
<…>
Lástima que los dos primeros gráficos desaparecerán a principio de Diciembre de este año. Se basan en una herramienta de Google que va a descatalogar (Google Fusion Tables), y aunque hay alternativas para gráficos convencionales y GIS, no han dado una hasta la fecha para los gráficos de redes (hay cosas por allí, pero no gratuitas y abiertas sin restricciones). Google ha matado ya unos cuantos proyectos … (180): https://killedbygoogle.com/. Todos los gráficos denotan una constancia, y no son gratuitos. Al fin y al cabo, persistencia, tiempo y buen hacer son las claves. Acabo de mirar cuántos miembros del foro han obtenido más de 1K méritos (excluyendo los del airdrop inicial): a fecha del ayer, tan sólo 43! Desde ahora como ya sabes, de cara a los rangos, sólo precisas posts y tiempo - algo menos de 4 meses para Hero y entorno a un mínimo de 14 meses para Legendary ... |
|
|
|
Here are a couple more cases, with the same objective, but different kick-off approach: [Beware]Bitcointalk PHISHING attempt by E-Mail Fake airdrop / phishing website posted in "Services"The former is initiated by the reception of an external Email allegedly sent from Bitcointalk, asking you to prove you are the owner of your account. The email obviously is not sent from Bitcointalk, but camouflaged just enough to make you think it might be. The contained phishing link looks like a regular Bitcointalk link, but it isn’t. You are directed to a phishing site that has an initial screen that asks you for your login credentials, it captures them, and then redirects you to Bitcointalk (official site, but obviously without having performed the actual real login). The latter created an Airdrop thread, luring people to participate. He then PMs them, providing a phishing link similar to the above case (on the same domain and all; same site). All in all, we need to place proper attention to cases such as these, and the one nicely detailed in the OP. |
|
|
|
|
He procedido a actualizar el listado de los top 100 hilos meritados en nuestro foro local, así como el documento Google Sheet con la relación completa de todos los hilos meritados en nuestro foro local, y los top 50 hilos meritados en los últimos 60 dias.
Datos a 27/09/2019. Mi idea es ir refrescándolo cada mes aproximdamente.
En total se han otorgado en nuestro foro local:
* Número de Méritos: 4.180
* Número de Enviadores distintos: 148
* Número de Receptores distintos: 375
* Número de Hilos Meritados: 972
* Número de Posts Meritados: 2.117
|
|
|
|
|
Se ha procedido a actualizar el OP con los datos a fecha 27/09/2019.
2 Hero Members, 5 Sr. Members, 6 Full Members, 32 Members, y 103 Jr. Members que han precisado sMéritos para escalar de rango.
|
|
|
|
He procedido a actualizar los listados mostrados en los primeros posts, con la relación de todos los meritados en nuestro foro local, con datos a 27/09/2019. El total de sMéritos otorgados en nuestro foro local es de 4.180, acorde a la siguiente distribución: año mes nMerits
2019 9 171 (mes parcial)
2019 8 147
2019 7 237
2019 6 252
2019 5 147
2019 4 150
2019 3 213
2019 2 160
2019 1 192
2018 12 172
2018 11 217
2018 10 235
2018 9 359
2018 8 140
2018 7 281
2018 6 127
2018 5 170
2018 4 161
2018 3 146
2018 2 279
2018 1 224
|
|
|
|
<…>
I figure you’ve got multiple accounts (allowed so long as you abide by the rules and ethics considering merit), since you are posting from a Hero account and asking about a Member ranked account. You’re probably missing out the Merit requirement, alongside the Activity requirement (see Merit & new rank requirements): In addition to activity, everyone now has a merit score, and you need both a certain activity level and a certain merit score in order to reach higher member ranks. The required scores are: | Rank | Required activity | Required merit | | Brand new | 0 | 0 | | Newbie | 1 | 0 | | Jr Member | 30 | 1 | | Member | 60 | 10 | | Full Member | 120 | 100 | | Sr. Member | 240 | 250 | | Hero Member | 480 | 500 | | Legendary | Random in the range 775-1030 | 1000 |
The account you’re on about will require at least 100 merits to reach the Full Member rank. Check you merit counter in your profile. If you are asking about it, it probably means that you’ve got either 0 or 10 merits (depending on when the Member ranked account was created). |
|
|
|
Data updated as of 28/09/2019. Link to the Personal Trust Network. Link to the Base File (Data to load the Personal Trust Network (first tab) + Summary per user (second tab -> interesting to see most trusted/distrusted and so on)) Summary: Date Trust/Dist. rel. Trust rel. Distrust rel. Customized Lists Distinct Trusted/Untrusted
28/09/2019 35738 28830 6908 4486 9871
21/09/2019 35662 28797 6865 4479 9838
14/09/2019 35454 28669 6785 4475 9783
07/09/2019 35306 28565 6741 4468 9771
31/08/2019 35351 28630 6721 4463 9757
24/08/2019 35340 28579 6761 4460 9744
17/08/2019 35185 28458 6727 4453 9727
10/08/2019 35132 28431 6701 4446 9706
03/08/2019 34975 28316 6659 4432 9685
27/07/2019 34596 27990 6606 4421 9644
13/07/2019 34244 27780 6464 4384 9548
06/07/2019 34233 27741 6492 4372 9525
29/06/2019 33906 27496 6410 4361 9457
22/06/2019 33782 27408 6374 4347 9426
15/06/2019 33593 27278 6315 4338 9408
08/06/2019 33446 27278 6168 4328 9362
01/06/2019 33080 26980 6100 4293 9325
25/05/2019 32747 26710 6037 4268 9288
18/05/2019 32611 26634 5977 4264 9257
11/05/2019 32177 26264 5913 4247 9243
04/05/2019 32026 26204 5822 4239 9216
27/04/2019 31850 26075 5775 4221 9154
20/04/2019 31811 26065 5746 4217 9137
13/04/2019 31572 25858 5714 4212 9115
06/04/2019 31353 25721 5632 4203 9044
30/03/2019 31029 25621 5408 4199 8922
23/03/2019 30920 25520 5400 4193 8913
16/03/2019 31142 25640 5502 4191 8893
09/03/2019 31118 25632 5486 4183 8882
02/03/2019 31002 25515 5487 4169 8868
23/02/2019 31567 25845 5722 4160 8837
16/02/2019 31542 25762 5780 4151 8872
09/02/2019 31450 25710 5740 4145 8855
02/02/2019 31238 25392 5846 4123 8811
26/01/2019 25777 22083 3694 4083 8707
19/01/2019 25387 21811 3576 4052 8662
12/01/2019 23800 20720 3080 3957 8498
05/01/2019 22605 19637 2968 3891 8527
note: skipped week -> 20/07/2019 That is an additional 7 customized lists this last week, 33 new net Trust relations and 43 new net Distrust relations. In addition, I've detected the Profiles that all trust each other:- 7 members where all trust all: 5 cases (complete graph networks) - 6 members where all trust all: 38 cases (complete graph networks) - 5 members where all trust all: 170 cases (complete graph networks) - 4 members where all trust all: 522 cases (complete graph networks) - 3 members where all trust all: 1.028 cases (complete graph networks) - 2 members where all trust all: 2.295 cases (complete graph networks) I’ve listed them in the last tab ("All trust All circles") of the Base File.
Note: Google Fusion Tables will stop being accessible from 3rd of December 2019 onwards. To that effect, I will no longer be able to continue to publish the Customized Trust Network as is.
The data has 2 parts:
- The table of data, where by applying filters on can see who trusts whom.
- The cool graph part.
Migrating the former (data + filters) to the Dashboard for example is not much of a hassle. The later (graph) alas lacks a proper alternative to migrate to that is open to everyone, and that requires no (or barely) any requirement.
If anyone is interested in that I keep the data part (not the graphical part) then let me know to plan ahead (otherwise I may scrap it). |
|
|
|
Update 27/09/2019:Updated Dashboard to reflect the most recent sMerit available data: Total sMerit: 465.367 Total Txs: 237.419 From Users: 20.911 To Users: 30.511 minDate: 2018-01-24 22:12:21 maxDate: 2019-09-27 02:39:36 The dashboard gives you access to anyone’s complete merit history in the TX tab, surpassing the 120 day limit. Link: BitcoinTalk Merit Dashboard. Aggregate awarded sMerit for the last complete week (16/09/2019 .. 22/09/2019) is 4.449 which is up 14,34% from the previous week. In addition, there is 1 new Legendary this week: poptop -> Legendary from Hero member during Merit System kick-off. Also related: Customized Trust Network – Interactive tool to see who we trust/distrust.
|
|
|
|
Update 27/09/2019:Updated to reflect the most recent sMerit available data, with access to the full transaction history (no 120 day limit). Link: User Merit Network. This is now a subset of Link: Merit Dashboard. Total sMerit: 465.367 Total Txs: 237.419 From Users: 20.911 To Users: 30.511 minDate: 2018-01-24 22:12:21 maxDate: 2019-09-27 02:39:36 Also related: Customized Trust Network – Interactive tool to see who we trust/distrust.
Note: Google Fusion Tables will stop being accessible from 3rd of December 2019 onwards. To that effect, I will no longer be able to continue to publish the Merit Network as is.
The data has 2 parts:
- The table of data, where by applying filters on can see who trusts whom.
- The cool graph part.
Migrating the former (data + filters) to the Dashboard for example is not much of a hassle. The later (graph) alas lacks a proper alternative to migrate to that is open to everyone, and that requires no (or barely) any requirement. If anyone is interested in that I keep the data part (not the graphical part) then let me know to plan ahead (otherwise I may scrap it).
|
|
|
|
<…>
Pocos no son … Has dado el primer mérito a 181 personas (de todas las secciones). El dato de @Coin-1 es menor pues el mira desde una fecha determinada (cuando entró en marcha la nueva regla para Jr. Member con lo de precisar al menos 1 mérito), mientras que yo he mirado todo el histórico. |
|
|
|
<...>
El BitcoinTalk Merit Dashboard lo actualizo cada Viernes por la tarde (a eso de las 17h UTC – España es UTC+2 ahora), y si no puedo, lo completo el sábado por la mañana. Ahora mismo estoy bajando datos (12 horas de máquina bajando perfiles de usuario), por lo que, si quieres ver reflejados los datos completos hasta este viernes (las TXs con los méritos hasta hoy), mejor mirarlo mañana para estar seguros. En todo caso. Los siguientes filtros te ayudarán a ver los datos mejor: 1) Visión global resumida: https://public.tableau.com/shared/62WXSKFHN?:display_count=yes&:origin=viz_share_link2) Cómo está la “balanza” entre los sMéritos que has enviado y los recibidos con cada persona: https://public.tableau.com/shared/B5GH56WRB?:display_count=yes&:origin=viz_share_link3) Posts tuyos más meritados (no hilos – no los puedo filtrar por OP): https://public.tableau.com/shared/BZDCW93CD?:display_count=yes&:origin=viz_share_link (clicka el nombre del post para ir a él, aunque veo que Tableau tiene un bug y no permite ir a todos los de nombre largo). 4) Tus sMerits TX (enviadas): https://public.tableau.com/shared/55JQNC5QH?:display_count=yes&:origin=viz_share_link5) Tus sMerits TX (recibidas): https://public.tableau.com/shared/CJ6JS37BF?:display_count=yes&:origin=viz_share_link6) Cuánta gente has meritado (global y por sección): https://public.tableau.com/shared/ZB5RJWD84?:display_count=yes&:origin=viz_share_link7) Gráfico de quienes te han meritado: https://fusiontables.google.com/DataSource?docid=1wM2Op6_ol8_0iP0sDEemIGr9weKvIeLPvKsKMpFy#chartnew:id=3 (si no se ven todos, has de incrementar el número de nodos encima del gráfico). Pon tu usuario en “ToUserName” 8 ) Gráfico de a quienes has meritado: https://fusiontables.google.com/DataSource?docid=1wM2Op6_ol8_0iP0sDEemIGr9weKvIeLPvKsKMpFy#chartnew:id=4 (ídem con los nodos y el usuario) 9) Gráfico acumulado de los méritos recibidos (filtrable por sección): https://public.tableau.com/shared/NH9M5HSTJ?:display_count=yes&:origin=viz_share_link10) Gráfico acumulado de los méritos enviados: https://public.tableau.com/shared/Q75THF34H?:display_count=yes&:origin=viz_share_link11) Rachas de días consecutivos meritado (global y por sección): https://public.tableau.com/shared/NK7CXDN4H?:display_count=yes&:origin=viz_share_link (26 días consecutivos es tu record, 22 en la zona de Economy (WO)). Hay alguna cosilla más, pero lo anterior es la esencia de lo que tengo. Comentar que los enlaces de (1..1) ya van filtrados. Debido a ello, si ves que alguno tiene una fecha arriba del todo (barra deslizadora), puede que no se actualice cuando refresque la BD esta tarde, y deba estirarse a la derecha para coger los datos de la semana que tengo que añadir.-> Parece que los enlaces de arriba se reflescan correctamente al añadir una semana más de datos (la barra superior del intérvalo de fechas se actualiza solo y no requiere ajuste manual). Congrats! |
|
|
|
<…>
Nice list there. The objectively interesting thing to see is that there are numerous profiles related to these doings, having all sorts of ranks (it may be good to add the rank to visualize this when and if you have time for it). I don’t know if you intend to keep the thread on Beginners & Help, but here it serves as a clear warning for those that do not wander into Scam Accusations and Reputation. In addition, it’s important to check out the Trust rating in order to glimpse through the ratings and feedback. |
|
|
|
<...>
We’re going way of course on this thread, but I’ll answer your question. I got it working (remember, I’ve no Pyrus myself, so it is all with an empty wallet): I followed the Pyrus link found in the official article ( https://support.ledger.com/hc/en-us/articles/115005459725-Ubiq-UBQ-), using Firefox. It took me to a Pyrus website where I created a New wallet, gave it a password, downloaded the Keystore file, continued, saved the address, reached a screen that says "How would you like to access your wallet", selected "Ledger Wallet". Now you need to connect the Ledger device, pass the pin lock screen and open the ubiq app on the Ledger If you don't do this, it will display errors). Once you’ve done that, press the "Connect to Ledger Wallet” green button on the pyrus website and you are good to go (displays a list of addresses to interact with). Note1: I don't really like the procedure, and even the Pyrus website is outdated (the instructions to connect to Ledger still talk about a chrome extention, which is obsolete). Note2: If you wish to proceed with this topic, it is better to open a new topic. |
|
|
|
|
Well the good news, for now, is that nobody has made a single payment to neither the displayed BTC address (18hYaDXFpx7zfKb8mo62gyScmwZGEoBDnE) nor the ETH address (0x7A2BB19483e0df6fC7D5159e2F70480CfeF4C50A), despite their veil attempt at placing fake dynamic TXs on their scam site. Looks like it either lacks visibility so far, or that it is so bizarre that even the most gullible have not fallen for it (yet).
Edit:
Well some have fallen for it: 1 BTC TX (0.001 BTC) and 3 different ETH TXs (0.2, 0.017, 2 ETH).
|
|
|
|
|
I tried to make analyse signatures way back, but found that it was rather much a cul-de-sac to interpret (or at least it was for me).
The exercise is very interesting, although I do find the PPD rather low in general. For example Chipmixer has a PPD of 2.4, but going over the last two weeks of the spread sheet it is more in the 4.4 to 4.6 area (some random lower week tolled 3.87). It may be related to dividing by the 110 distinct participants over a 365 day period. If we do it by a rough 60 concurrent participants, we get a 4.4 PPD, which is in line with the spreadsheet. Ofcourse we know the number of cuncurrent users in Chipmixer, but not off-hand for all the other campaigns.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
