10000刀~

不要问我怎么分析的,等跌破50刀,我再给大家讲具体原理

2013年开涨的时候,我第一个预测会突破300,进而会突破600,当时没一个人相信。今年很可能会反向冲击,资本不相信鸵鸟,闭眼无法避免悲剧。

我猜在9000上半年可以达到

You can just quote the post and the code is there. Best to post an image of the sig if you don't want people to copy it.

我说说我的

12号下午在火币提现14点下的提现单子，到晚上22点多才审核通过，然后23点才发出去网络，之后拿tx id在blockchain查询不到交易，但是在rejected那里就可以查询到，之后就悲剧的等到13号凌晨7点才到帐

今天13号下午13点再提币，到现在16点半还没审核，中间在接近15点时尝试提1个币，到现在也还没审核

A lot of BTC was paid to lawyer and seems the advice was stop serving US residents. What a useless and expensive advice.

传销：
《禁止传销条例》规定，传销是指组织者或者经营者发展人员，通过对被发展人员以其直接或者间接发展的人员数量或者销售业绩为依据计算和给付报酬，或者要求被发展人员以交纳一定费用为条件取得加入资格等方式牟取非法利益，扰乱经济秩序，影响社会稳定的行为。1998年4月21日，中国政府宣布全面禁止传销。

定义传销，最重要的就是看其奖金制度是否具备金字塔模式， 而不是仅仅只是局限于产品的质量和种类。

===========================================================================

NXT 一共有 10 亿个币。 最开始是71个人有 NXT币。 以后每次有新的加入者， 顶端的拥有者都会得到分红，就是说他们手里的NXT币会增加。

这和股票不一样，股票是公司发行的（皮包骗子公司例外），早期股票拥有者的股票不会因为有新买股票者而增加。

而NXT币，不能挖矿， 只能购买。 如果我买了NXT币， 为什么早期 NXT 币拥有者手里的 NXT 币会增加？ 这不是变相传销又是什么？

 

这两天比特币钱包和网络遭受大规模攻击，目前没有出现损失，等一下吧，应该没问题。一直不敢用火币网，我喜欢免费，不过真的怀疑它能否运营下去。

Dear friends

Your chinese exchange BTC China is very good. But we have no possibility to fund money.

I give you an idea.  You can offer to Russians the buy/sell service of BTC-China vouchers, and you could earn money with it.

What about the payment?

In Russia there is very popular payment system, called QIWI Wallet. This system works only with Russian Rubel, but it doesn't matter. You have exchange rate RMB to RUB.

The payments from QIWI Wallet to another QIWI Wallet is instant and free of charge.

The website is QIWI.com.  If you scroll down, on the left you can switch to English.

The only thing you need to registrate at the QIWI Wallet is SIM-card from following countries:

Russia, Panama, UK, Israel, Turkey, Ukraine, Vietnam, India, Thailand, USA, Japan, South Korea.

The SIM-Card you need only for the first activation of the QIWI Wallet via SMS, and you don't need it anymore.


Then, you can offer your own buy/sell service on the Russian sector of this forum.

If you need any assistance, please ask.

Thank you for your attention

Yeah, I get it. I still fail to see how (any) "most of the OP predictions are becoming reality." from the events of the last few days. All I see in the OP are five arguable points. None of which seem to have given any additinal credence over the last few days.

And it was a serious question - are you a moderator here? If you think this is all such a watse of time, are you getting at least paid for your role?
"validated by the

Let's assume we have a bank called "Bitcoin Bank". People can open accounts at the bank, get an account number (bitcoin address), and send money to their account. Money is transferred with cheque.

Gox opened many accounts at the Bitcoin Bank, with many account numbers. They give one account number to one customer. By monitoring these accounts, gox will know which customer has sent money to them, and credit to their gox account

When a customer submits a withdrawal request, gox will sign a cheque for one of its accounts at the bitcoin bank. They take a photo of the cheque, and use it as an evidence of delivery. However, some of the cheques issued by gox have dirt on them. Some customers cleaned the cheque first, then sent to Bitcoin Bank and got paid. The related gox account is then emptied.

Unlike a traditional bank, the bitcoin bank will publish the photos of all accepted cheques. Gox compares their photo records with the public records. Since the accepted cheque looks different from the original cheque (dirt is removed), gox can't recognize it and falsely believes that the related accounts still have money. Therefore, when another customer requests for withdrawal, they try to sign another cheque with the now emptied account. The bitcoin bank will reject this double spending cheque, and lead to all those withdrawal issues we have seen.

Even worse, some customers find the gox's bug and try to exploit it. After they cashed the cleaned cheque, they complain to gox saying that they have not received a cheque. Since gox can't find the cheque in the record of Bitcoin Bank, they credit the bitcoin back to the customer's gox account so the customer doubled his bitcoin at the expense of gox's fund

So gox now blames the Bitcoin Bank that it should not accept the altered but yet valid cheque.

Gox also proposes that people should not trace a cheque by comparing photo. Instead, they should trace the unique ID of each cheque, as the ID is non-modifiable. They require the Bitcoin Bank officially endorse this practice before the re-open bitcoin withdraw.

-----------------

So what is the practice of the standard bitcoin client (i.e. bitcoin-qt)? Instead of comparing the photo of cheque, bitcoin-qt actually monitors the account balance. Therefore, whether the cheque is altered is totally irrelevant.

Conclusion: Gox uses a WRONG way to trace transaction, and blame the Bitcoin Bank when everything is fucked up