I think it largely depends on the casino platform. Some casinos will not ask for KYC even for amounts of several thousand dollars, if there are no other suspicious things with the account, while others will ask for KYC on the first withdrawal, even for insignificant amounts.

I understand that certain regulatory requirements mandate casinos to perform KYC for larger transactions, be it deposits or withdrawals. However, I remain skeptical about casinos that insist on KYC for initial withdrawals without any specific reasons. This practice seems unfair, as it appears some gambling platforms may exploit KYC regulations for their own advantage. They allow unrestricted deposits but immediately request personal documents when players attempt to withdraw winnings. This tactic could discourage some players from withdrawing, potentially leading them to continue playing until they lose everything.

You forgot to provide valid evidence for your claims, just like Rikafip pointed out. No one will believe a random newbie with such baseless claims without concrete and reliable proof.

I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think you can create a thread that violates forum rules, even if it's self-moderated. I don't have a specific example, but I believe moderators remove posts from self-moderated threads as well.

You can also consider BitBox02 from Shift Crypto: https://bitbox.swiss/

Shift Crypto is a Swiss company, and as far as I know, they have an impeccable reputation so far. They have both, Bitcoin only and multicoin versions of the hardware wallet, the software and firmware is open source and the price is comparable to the Ledger Nano X. Personally, I like the design of the device even more than the Ledger, especially the screen and touch buttons.

This is according to my understanding of the forum rules: you cannot create a topic with local rules that conflict with the global rules of the forum.  Imagine if someone could make a topic in which plagiarism, or begging, or spam is allowed according to local rules.  That wouldn't make much sense. I think the same thing applies to off-topic discussion.

OP, as others have already mentioned, your best bet would be to contact Duelbits customer support and see what they say. The withdrawal should not normally take that long, but it is possible that your case has been flagged for manual review due to their regulatory requirements. Has the casino asked you for KYC? Sometimes, the verification of KYC documents can take some time. There was a recent case from member BitcoinHunt3r who was waiting for verification for about 9 days. If that's the case, you have no other option but to wait until your KYC is verified and the withdrawal is approved.


edit: Apologies, I read your last reply afterwards. It seems that KYC is not the issue, but rather your withdrawal has encountered their manual verification process.

Sorry for bumping this discussion again, but I just found out that you added Megapari to the list. Personally, I think it's a good decision. What raises concern for me is the fact that their representative denied any association when I asked about it in their ANN thread. That was a blatant lie and only reinforces my view that they cannot be trusted.

You are correct in pointing out that Megapari uses the BetB2B platform, which is owned by 1xBET. This connection is quite apparent, but for those who may still have doubts, they can refer to reliable casino review websites that confirm this information:

https://casinodaddy.com/casino-platforms/betb2b/
https://www.askgamblers.com/white-label-casino/betb2b

Even if it's only a white label, it doesn't make a difference because, in that scenario, Megapari is simply a front, and all the crucial operations are handled by 1xBET behind the scenes. It's basically just another 1xbit/22bet/Adkinsbet/Kawbet/Melbet/Pnxbet... case all over again.

Don't act so surprised. I have a gut feeling that you know exactly what he's referring to. (unless, of course, you have some kind of split personality, in which case, I apologize).

But anyway, let me try to offer my assistance here:

There was a giveaway topic in Games and rounds sub which has now been removed but is still available in the archives (Loyce.club and Ninjastic.space)

You first joined with your Hamich124D account, then after a follow-up question from the OP you first replied with the ramzifcb47 account, then you quickly removed that post, and replied again with the Hamich124D account. About 20 minutes later you joined the giveaway with your ramzifcb47 account once again.


https://ninjastic.space/topic/5240187


Now, when we take into account the feedback on the Karma24 account and everything nutildah posted earlier, everything falls into place.

Some people simply couldn't care less about rules and good behavior, even if you practically smack them in the face with them. And honestly, they can't be helped.

Based on what I've learned from old threads on this forum, I believe the opposite to be true. It seems that things were much simpler back then compared to today. The Bitcoin Qt software served as both a wallet and a mining tool, all addresses started with "1," and the main security concern was safeguarding your wallet.dat file and private keys. In the early days, there were no altcoins (except for a few), SPV wallets (until Electrum came along), seed phrases, or SegWit addresses,... and scams were also far less common than they are now, mainly due to the smaller size and tight-knit nature of the early Bitcoin community.

So yes, there are a thousand and one ways to acquire bitcoin today, but there are also just as many ways to lose it permanently.

I can only imagine what it was like in the old days when that saying was coined, but nowadays, I find it hard to believe that a "gentleman's agreement" still exists. Everyone looks only at their own interests, often neglecting the well-being or concerns of others. And those driven by greed for wealth, which we can often meet in the gambling world, are often regarded as some of the worst.

That's why it's hard to trust anyone, unless you have a really high level of trust in them and a track record that shows they're trustworthy. It's always better to be cautious and skeptical, especially when dealing with money.

To my knowledge, there hasn't been a single documented case of this specific type of attack. When you scan a QR code with your software wallet, the payment information is directly fed into your wallet without going through a clipboard buffer. This eliminates the possibility of malware intercepting and modifying the information. Nevertheless, it's still a good idea to double-check that the payment details actually match what you see on the screen next to the QR code, just to be safe.

Upravo tako. Ponekad bacim pogled na WO temu, i koliko vidim, većina novih članova ide tamo isključivo zbog merita. OK, ima i nekoliko OG-ova, ali cijeli thread bi se moglao pretvoriti u neku vrstu trollboxa koji se vrti u stvarnom vremenu. To bi možda moglo biti i zanimljivije i privlačnije mlađoj populaciji.

I understand that it is a percentage and not a fixed amount, but even so, relying solely on percentages can also be misleading. Let me give you an example: I personally spend less than 50% of my total income on regular expenses, which means that for me, 5% would not have the same impact as it would for someone with a limited income who needs every penny just to cover their current expenses.

That's why I said that everyone should be aware of their financial capabilities and make wise spending decisions.

Nice catch logfiles! It's not just that they copied the terms of service from furxe.com, but they didn't even bother to replace "FURXE" with their own name in several instances throughout the text. How lazy can you get?



It's pretty obvious that their failure to pay attention to detail seriously calls into question their competence and reliability. Honestly, I wouldn't advise anyone to put their money in the hands of someone who shows such laziness and carelessness.

It is an interesting topic to discuss and hear different perspectives of the forum community.
I decided on a modest percentage of around 5% to 6%. That seems reasonable to me. However, I understand that everyone's financial situation and attitude towards gambling and risk-taking may be different. What might be reasonable for one person may not be for another. In any case, we should all be aware of our financial circumstances and limitations.

I'm not sure where you got this list of casinos, but it's generally expected to provide a source when sharing such information. I don't want to imply that your post is plagiarized, but if you did gather the list from another source, it's important to attribute it properly and give credit to the original source.

Yes, it does seem a bit unusual to continue running a signature campaign while the site is still undergoing updates or upgrades. In my opinion, it would have been better if the campaign had been temporarily paused and then resumed once the site upgrade was completed. Perhaps he wasn't aware that pausing the campaign was an option?


It seems like the developer has their hands full with all the tasks related to the site, leaving little time to communicate important updates and notifications to the community. In my opinion, the best course of action would be to bring on board a skilled community manager who can take charge of that aspect. I'm sure that there are some competent members within the community who might be willing to offer their services for a reasonable fee.

---

Perhaps you missed it, but OP already holds the "cooper member" status. Besides, he has been promoted to the rank of "Jr. member," which is sufficient for embedding images on the forum.

I think that's pretty normal. From what I've seen, the number of merits sent has consistently stayed above 20k since June 2021, typically ranging from 23k to 28k. So I'm not exactly sure where Coin-1 got the figure of 19k from. Although, it's possible that I overlooked some monthly stats during my quick review.

Thanks for the reply. It appears that the user may have jumped to conclusions too hastily, which is not uncommon in the online gambling realm. Fortunately, the issue has already been resolved, and I'm glad to hear that.