|
I've heard about several similar projects, it's not bad
|
|
|
|
|
Does the project not show the results of the fundraising campaign?
|
|
|
|
|
I think developers need to attach links to those projects that are listed in their portfolio. This will add credibility to the project
|
|
|
|
|
By the way, is there any list of exchanges with which this project will work?
|
|
|
|
By the way, what exactly will the team have from this project? I mean monetization
By the way, a good question. I did not see anything about this in the documentation |
|
|
|
By the way, will the payment differ depending on the quality of the content?
I think that in this respect, developers should work as well as with the bounty. That is, video is one amount, an analytical article is another amount. But how will the quality of the content be determined? I mean, will the same number of tokens be given for good and for a bad article? |
|
|
|
|
By the way, will the payment differ depending on the quality of the content?
|
|
|
|
Whats the technical main modules of the project?
Devs are working on investor issues, funds in general, due diligence, payment processing, API for trading, analytics, tokenization and the repository But due diligence and analytics is the same thing No its not there are some similarities, but if you are going to check the definition So hows this process working? Information provided by partners in the Due Diligence process can be treated confidentially and is stored outside the platform. Only the results of such verification will be publicly available to participants of the ecosystem. It is really sad, why would they do that? Why not? It doesnt make sense to give info about the due diligence to any stranger It just seeems unethical What do you mean? It is a normal thing for any project What about investors then? It is not cool to make a project without sharing any info Now there is a problem with that way of thinking... It looks normal to me, why dont you explain it then You see, anyone can become an investor and if devs are going to tell their competing platforms valuble info about the technical part of the project it might be ruined I thought tokebox is a unique project It is, but there are services like ICONOMI and Melonport So whats unique then? Check the whitepaper, I cant tell you all the info |
|
|
|
Whats the technical main modules of the project?
Devs are working on investor issues, funds in general, due diligence, payment processing, API for trading, analytics, tokenization and the repository But due diligence and analytics is the same thing No its not there are some similarities, but if you are going to check the definition So hows this process working? Information provided by partners in the Due Diligence process can be treated confidentially and is stored outside the platform. Only the results of such verification will be publicly available to participants of the ecosystem. It is really sad, why would they do that? Why not? It doesnt make sense to give info about the due diligence to any stranger It just seeems unethical What do you mean? It is a normal thing for any project What about investors then? It is not cool to make a project without sharing any info Now there is a problem with that way of thinking... It looks normal to me, why dont you explain it then You see, anyone can become an investor and if devs are going to tell their competing platforms valuble info about the technical part of the project it might be ruined I thought tokebox is a unique project It is, but there are services like ICONOMI and Melonport |
|
|
|
Whats the technical main modules of the project?
Devs are working on investor issues, funds in general, due diligence, payment processing, API for trading, analytics, tokenization and the repository But due diligence and analytics is the same thing No its not there are some similarities, but if you are going to check the definition So hows this process working? Information provided by partners in the Due Diligence process can be treated confidentially and is stored outside the platform. Only the results of such verification will be publicly available to participants of the ecosystem. It is really sad, why would they do that? Why not? It doesnt make sense to give info about the due diligence to any stranger It just seeems unethical What do you mean? It is a normal thing for any project What about investors then? It is not cool to make a project without sharing any info Now there is a problem with that way of thinking... It looks normal to me, why dont you explain it then You see, anyone can become an investor and if devs are going to tell their competing platforms valuble info about the technical part of the project it might be ruined |
|
|
|
Whats the technical main modules of the project?
Devs are working on investor issues, funds in general, due diligence, payment processing, API for trading, analytics, tokenization and the repository But due diligence and analytics is the same thing No its not there are some similarities, but if you are going to check the definition So hows this process working? Information provided by partners in the Due Diligence process can be treated confidentially and is stored outside the platform. Only the results of such verification will be publicly available to participants of the ecosystem. It is really sad, why would they do that? Why not? It doesnt make sense to give info about the due diligence to any stranger It just seeems unethical What do you mean? It is a normal thing for any project What about investors then? It is not cool to make a project without sharing any info Now there is a problem with that way of thinking... |
|
|
|
Whats the technical main modules of the project?
Devs are working on investor issues, funds in general, due diligence, payment processing, API for trading, analytics, tokenization and the repository But due diligence and analytics is the same thing No its not there are some similarities, but if you are going to check the definition So hows this process working? Information provided by partners in the Due Diligence process can be treated confidentially and is stored outside the platform. Only the results of such verification will be publicly available to participants of the ecosystem. It is really sad, why would they do that? Why not? It doesnt make sense to give info about the due diligence to any stranger It just seeems unethical What do you mean? It is a normal thing for any project |
|
|
|
Whats the technical main modules of the project?
Devs are working on investor issues, funds in general, due diligence, payment processing, API for trading, analytics, tokenization and the repository But due diligence and analytics is the same thing No its not there are some similarities, but if you are going to check the definition So hows this process working? Information provided by partners in the Due Diligence process can be treated confidentially and is stored outside the platform. Only the results of such verification will be publicly available to participants of the ecosystem. It is really sad, why would they do that? Why not? It doesnt make sense to give info about the due diligence to any stranger |
|
|
|
Whats the technical main modules of the project?
Devs are working on investor issues, funds in general, due diligence, payment processing, API for trading, analytics, tokenization and the repository But due diligence and analytics is the same thing No its not there are some similarities, but if you are going to check the definition So hows this process working? Information provided by partners in the Due Diligence process can be treated confidentially and is stored outside the platform. Only the results of such verification will be publicly available to participants of the ecosystem. |
|
|
|
Whats the technical main modules of the project?
Devs are working on investor issues, funds in general, due diligence, payment processing, API for trading, analytics, tokenization and the repository But due diligence and analytics is the same thing No its not there are some similarities, but if you are going to check the definition |
|
|
|
Whats the technical main modules of the project?
Devs are working on investor issues, funds in general, due diligence, payment processing, API for trading, analytics, tokenization and the repository |
|
|
|
By the way, have the sales of tokens already begun?
If I'm not mistaken, now there is a presale and it will last until the end of November So, the main stage of sales will start later? |
|
|
|
|
Honestly, I'm not sure that user information can be trusted
|
|
|
|
Can large investors participate in this project? It seems to me that this project is more focused on ordinary guys, like us.
Perhaps, I agree with this definition of the target audience. It is these users who need a crypto-currency fund. Of course, there are those who have enough experience to manage their funds, but not so much |
|
|
|
Do developers provide any guarantees regarding the profitability of our investments?
Um ... No, of course. Developers can honestly talk about the successes of past projects and the risk factors that accompany this campaign, but with all the confidence to talk about profits, it seems to me it makes no sense |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
