Yes, campaign managers will both facilitate their own business by setting the participant limit and prevent many users from accumulating in a single campaign. But there is one point I will object to here is that the prize pool is distributed to everyone equally. If such a thing is going to happen, why do we try to reach high ranks? If the rank system will be of no use, everyone should participate in campaigns with their new accounts and receive equal pay in this way. So, as long as the rank system exists, each participant should never win an equal amount of rewards. In addition, since there are differences between the signature of the users who have reached the top ranks and the signature of the accounts with low rank, this affects the equality significantly. Therefore, a limited number of participants should be included in the campaigns, but not everybody should be given an equal amount of reward. Everyone should win awards according to their rank.

It will definitely be a right choice to select a limited number of participants for each campaign. This will not only contribute to the higher share of the participants, but it will be more useful for the forum by ensuring competition among the members. There is also a situation that scam projects will not be able to participate in the campaigns of many projects and fewer people will see that project because that project will be introduced by fewer people. So, in fact, choosing limited participants for each campaign is something that can lead to very positive results. I hope this happens soon and we will get better results.

As I mentioned in my previous posts, I expect the following effects to be seen on online gambling services after the halving process.

Alternative Payment Methods: Due to the increasing number of transactions in the Bitcoin network and mining power, mining commissions paid for transactions will increase. If this increase reaches substantial amounts, users will demand alternative methods to ship with cheaper commission. This would be a very bad disadvantage for services that only provide the opportunity to gamble with Bitcoin.

Low Commission Competition: As I mentioned in the upper factor, the withdrawal transaction fee demanded by the websites will increase due to the increasing miner fees. In this case, users will prefer the service with the lowest amount of this commission as well as the quality service. This, in turn, will result in the loss of customers of services that provide withdrawal with a high commission.

Opportunity to Play with BTC Balance: The services that provide gambling service with the amount of Bitcoin sent will benefit from this advantage. The services that demand money with Bitcoin but transfer the balance in USD, EUR or similar currency after the money investment will cause loss of customers for this reason.

Personally, I do not want my identity to be known when gambling, and I usually try to use services that do not require authentication. As I am already gambling for pleasure, I usually gamble with very low amounts of money, and therefore I do not encounter authentication problems when withdrawing money in the event of a possible normal win. I also want my identity to be unknown when gambling because I do not trust such services too much and I do not want anyone to know that I have earned that money in case of a possible big win. I am sure, many people think like me and pay attention to such factors when choosing services for online gambling. Anyway, I want to ask you this question. Why should we both deposit money and provide our identity or passport information to these services where we usually play games for pleasure?

Every person has different tastes, thoughts and desires. Therefore, it would not be right to make a generalization in this way. Unfortunately, although some things are logically correct, we cannot unambiguously say "Slots are better than Dice." Personally, yes, I support this idea. I prefer to play slot games against rolling dice because I am not very fond of rolling dice and I like slot style games more. That's why I support your opinion, but as I mentioned in the first message, every person has different tastes, thoughts and desires, so it is not right for everyone to think like this or to force everyone to think like that.

There are dozens of factors to consider when trading. Apart from a few factors you mentioned, a few mistakes are as follows;
- Not using stop loss
- Panic buying and selling
- Using high leverage
- Failure to determine profit and loss rates correctly

In addition to all these, the biggest mistake we make while trading is to be greedy and to always expect a profit margin above the targets we set.

For short-term trades, the market seems to be suitable. Especially recently, due to the start of the market activity and the increase in the transaction volume, I started to increase my daily transaction count. Although I am a trader every day, I follow the market more in such periods and I take care to increase the number of transactions during these periods. In fact, there is always the opportunity to trade for a real trader, but when there are market conditions like this, we have to do more and evaluate our market mobility and evaluate our chances of making more money. Although the market is suitable for making money, I recommend that people who do not have enough knowledge and experience do not trade or carefully, with little stop using stop loss. On the other hand, we should not be greedy in such occasions and we should not leave our transactions to chance after we have achieved the targeted profit margin.

It is essential to use an exchange service to trade, so no investor can fully stay away from these services. Generally, individuals who do not want to keep their investments in their wallets of such services send money to exchange services for a short period of time depending on market movements. After this submission, he quickly completes his transactions and transfers his existing capital back to his own wallet. This is actually nothing more than the user self-suffering for short-term transactions, but unfortunately exchange services do not provide us with any extra security measures to safely store our money. I usually prefer to keep my money in my wallet or exchange accounts. I am not constantly transferring between my wallet and exchange service account.

I did not fully examine the changes you mentioned, but I see that I was right about what I wrote in my previous messages. Before the purchase process, I wrote many messages in the style of "If this news is correct, CZ will be the most rose manipulator of the market and will direct it as it wishes." Today I see that my estimates are correct and market changes started with small changes. I hope we don't see such changes frequently, and CZ alone cannot make cryptocurrency markets worse.

To evaluate the online games in general, I guess that the 2 most preferred games are as follows;
- Poker
- Blackjack

If we need to guess about the games we can play with crypto without generalizing, I guess that the 2 most preferred games are as follows;
- Dice
- Crash

* In both of my reviews, I made an evaluation excluding slots and similar popular games.

Yes, I think you have the situation you are talking about all over the world, especially in my own country, and that businesses only serve their permanent subscribers they trust. Although I have not witnessed this in my own country, I think that such a thing could happen because the majority of my country's income source is casinos and that the state can tolerate it. Also, I would like to ask you another question I was curious about.

'' Has not all casino businesses that have been working with such a high profit margin accumulate for difficult days? Why don't they use their budgets devoted to other projects and other projects in these difficult days? ''

Regardless of what we users and investors do, we cannot prevent it. Unfortunately, it is not right to expect an increase in XRP price with such a bad project team, and if the team continues to sell in this way, the project will likely be a scam. Although I personally do not have an investment as an enemy of XRP, I give my support for anyone who just regrets and regrets this signature campaign. I hope this situation is now taken precaution and the project team will be more careful with the users. I hope that we do not witness that such a project has died due to the continuation of these sales.

McAfee is known for its speculations in the cryptocurrency market. It is a personality that has become popular due to its perception as a successful analyst, especially in the early periods of speculation, but has no qualifications. I think that any project announced or managed by this person, who has been on the agenda with various exaggerated predictions, absurd claims and rumors in the past period, is not reliable and will not be. In particular, I recommend that all investors who are considering investing in this project should research carefully and invest accordingly.

Details updated, i want to make re-apply for this campaign.

Ethereum'da görebileceğimiz en kötü şey bu, sebepsiz yere GAS ücretleri artabiliyor ve bazı durumlarda da uzun süre bu durum devam edebiliyor. Özellikle son zamanlarda piyasanın hareketlenmiş olması, uzun süredir pasif duran cüzdanların harekete geçmiş olması ve Ethereum 2.0 güncellemesi sebebi ile ne yazık ki sürekli olarak GAS ücretlerinin coştuğunu görüyoruz. Benim bildiğim bir önemli gelişme veya IEO tarzında ücretleri yükseltecek bir yenilik yok. Büyük ihtimalle ağ üzerinde sıkıntı var veya yine sebepsiz yere ücretler yükseltilmiş olabilir. GAS ücretlerindeki bu artışın önemli bir sebebi bulunuyor mu? Aramızda bu konu hakkında haber veya başka bir duyuru vs. gören var mı?

Actually, the answer is quite simple;

Youtube: Since it is the largest video portal in the world, many economists and analysts share educational videos here. You can improve yourself by finding easy and practical trainings here. You can also get more comfortable education by accessing the training videos in your own language here.
Websites: Various websites publish many articles on these topics. You can learn about various topics by reading these articles. You can also find more comfortable education by finding websites that share articles in your own language.
Social Media: You can find training posts and live broadcast on Twitter and Instagram platforms, you can look at their training.
Forex Trainings: Yes, although it seems unrelated to the crypto industry, you can learn Forex trainings and technical and basic analysis lessons.

All you have to do is do research and find videos, articles and other resources that are told both globally and in your native language.

As I have written on such topics before, I would like to say that you should not prefer services that you do not know because of the low transaction commission. You should not risk all this money to pay less transaction commission, especially when your savings are your current capital. For this reason, before choosing the services that allow you to trade with lower transaction commissions, you should definitely research about that service. Personally, since I usually use the most reliable services in the market, unfortunately I will not be able to offer a service in the style you want.

You don't need to prove that you bought here, after all you just shared your ideas and thoughts. Also, I would like to say that although it is a positive thing for a person or a business to buy so much, it is not a good thing for a single person or a business to have so much Bitcoin. Yes, there may have been such a large purchase with the bullish prospect, but it should not be forgotten that with such a large amount, a very serious sales wave can occur and the price can vary greatly. On the other hand, although your transaction is profitable now, there is a possibility that you may have panic buy because of the news you read.

Tek bir proje değil fakat hakkında araştırma yaptığım ve önümüzdeki yıllarda değerlenmesini düşündüğüm birkaç proje şu şekildedir;
- Ethereum
- Litecoin
- EOS
- Tezos
- ADA
- Link
- NEO
- Monero
- TRX (Herkes şaşıracak )

Sanırım Bitcoin'i listeye eklememe gerek yok, o zaten fix diyebiliriz.

Although Binance seems to consider its users in the process of removing this pair, I actually think that this is not the main reason. According to some reports that I have read in the last few days, Binance is preparing to list this new token. In other words, it was very likely that the experiment was made with FTX tokens at the first stage and now Binance aims to gain power in this field by listing the tokens it will create. Personally, I don't think that usually such great services will make special improvements just for users. As I mentioned in the invisible part of this event, a situation that will have the advantage of Binance will surely happen or it happened without us noticing.