|
The city already has grant money for it, they are trying to condense the city so they are willing to help them move people from the outskirts to the center. Houses in the "D" sell from anywhere from 1k-10k in the slum parts.
|
|
|
|
|
Yea, can we say late fee?
|
|
|
|
|
No hablo?
أنا لا أتكلم ?
Je ne parle pas?
Δεν μιλώ?
The last time I was not lazy and double checked the community blasted me for "Talking to the feds".
Or is that past you? Fuck your lazy talk and fuck your shrimp talk bubba gump. I'm done being nice to bitcoin people.................
|
|
|
|
|
can not award the prize till I get my coin from the exchange, sucks for everyone......
|
|
|
|
|
George Soros, can not be related to bitcoin in any way if so please point out how....
|
|
|
|
|
Anyone here heard of Marc Emery... Never came to the U.S. but is in us prison or how about Manuel Antonio Noriega just some people that never set foot in the U.S. but pissed off the gov. They think they are free and clear thanks to a legal team... U.S VS YOU The U.S. bank roll = everlasting compared to MPEx = small I am sure lol
I could give two flips less if you let me in your exchange, it is no better then mine... which does not exist lol. Your exchange is in just as much danger as the others do not down play it. The thing is if you do not comply the chance for loss is larger....... which you said you would do already.
|
|
|
|
The PR person is horrible, they are not what you would want coming from a business. The site is horrible to look at and I can not understand it. How am I supposed to move my Security there? Ltc global is way better, and I do not even own le coins lol.
What makes you think that you have "a security" or you'd be even remotely considered? Seriously now... Even if I did meet your standards, I would not list with you. Your site looks like shit... Vote on that? And you speak from emotions just like nef did, which makes you just as bad. It does not matter if you are the leader or not you still make the site look bad. See what I said before was just from a outside view and you took it personal not as a learning tool. Stop taking it so personal and worry about your business and not your feelings.  |
|
|
|
|
or the people running the securities lol
|
|
|
|
|
what everyone fails to note is a bitstream can build a asic lol best bitstream builds fastest Asic..... just saying for those who do not know how that works. There are places that will copy FPGA = ASIC but is supposed to be 10-25% faster and 60% cheaper. So if you do make a bitstream make sure it is public!
|
|
|
|
|
The PR person is horrible, they are not what you would want coming from a business. The site is horrible to look at and I can not understand it. How am I supposed to move my Security there? Ltc global is way better, and I do not even own lite coins lol.
|
|
|
|
|
Still does not change anything, I am now just doing what will Pay back or continue to pay investors keeping me out of jail/prison.
|
|
|
|
|
I do not know second life, but I assume the stock market does not go to real world purchases? The fact of if you don't like it do not use it I love, and I hope the gov does to. Don't bother me and I won't bother you is great, but Uncle Sam says if you don't bother to pay me I will come bother you.
|
|
|
|
|
Yea shadow no prob at all.
|
|
|
|
I'm not an expert, but I would think a "security" is selling what is ultimately a promise of some sort, whereas goats, feathers, chickens, and Bitcoins are all commodities at best - they are what they are.
I would think the problem isn't so much selling securities, it's in the issuing them. If I print securities (promises) out of my butt and offer them to the public at large, knowing full well there's a dozen ways I can cut and run with the money without any accountability, there's something wrong with that.
I never bought or touched any Bitcoin "securities" because I believe that securities require a framework of law and accountability in order to have any value. You can't have a public company insulated from the law, because it would also have to be just as insulated from its shareholders. If shareholders have no means to protect their interests and must simply rely on the goodness of others' anonymous hearts to maintain their value, well they're asking to get screwed.
The premise of a new decentralized stock exchange that operates like Silk Road or like the Bitcoin network itself is fundamentally flawed as well, and would only be an asset to scammers in my opinion. Sure, it's technologically possible to start one up, but without any accountability I doubt it'll be possible for an anonymous entity to issue securities that will have any lasting value above zero. I agree with you, the tender is not the issue here. I think gweedo fails to see this. |
|
|
|
|
I was just calling bullshit on the email....... boy did I get punked lol
|
|
|
|
its not? http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/08/unregistered-securities.asp#ixzz28PML2jewA security is not defined by how its bought or what its bought with. You could trade someone 1000 pounds of feathers for 4 shares in a company if the seller will take it. Guess what still makes it a security, the whole thing behind it being bitcoin is going to get lots of people screwed in the long run. A security is not defined by how it's purchased I hope people understand that. If someone was to sell a share of Google for 5 goats it does not matter he is still a shareholder. Buy 1 share of illegalstocks inc with 5 goats its still a illegal security. So tell me how its is in the gray area or legal. A security is a security no matter if you trade people goats, $ or Bitcoins. Its just the tender you used to buy it. |
|
|
|
|
Still working it out, just like lots of other issuers we were not prepared for this. I want to kick myself in the ass for it to, after I talked to the S.E.C guy. When I do come up with a plan I will email all the issuers I have info on with details, I will not post it here. I am not sure what our legality is and when I do, I will publish here email sent and that is all.
|
|
|
|
It is not illegal to discuss illegal matters.
Wrong it is called Conspiracy. In criminal law, a conspiracy is an agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime at some time in the future. Criminal law in some countries or for some conspiracies may require that at least one overt act must also have been undertaken in furtherance of that agreement, to constitute an offense. There is no limit on the number participating in the conspiracy and, in most countries, no requirement that any steps have been taken to put the plan into effect (compare attempts which require proximity to the full offence). For the purposes of concurrence, the actus reus is a continuing one and parties may join the plot later and incur joint liability and conspiracy can be charged where the co-conspirators have been acquitted or cannot be traced. Finally, repentance by one or more parties does not affect liability but may reduce their sentence. Two people talking about opening a illegal security is Conspiracy...... at least in U.S. law. This is always a charge used in almost any crime, it a way the gov "Put's it to you" |
|
|
|
|
You know you can buy cheaper dev boards and put the bitstream on them right?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
