Bitcoin Forum
July 16, 2024, 03:30:43 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 [524] 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 ... 578 »
10461  Other / Meta / Re: BITCOINTALK STAFF QUIETLY BANS PEOPLE FOR SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THEM on: October 08, 2014, 09:05:17 PM
No, it makes sense. Your argument doesn't though. You seem to think that trust is only meaningless because accounts are allowed to be sold, but whether they are or not makes no difference to the trust system because accounts will still be sold regardless. Banning the sale of accounts changes absolutely nothing, apart from maybe making people like you think they're now a little but safer, when they're not.

OK so lets just do away with pretending that the trust system actually matters then, can we?

The entire component should be removed from the forum since it is already prone to being abused.

You're like the American government trying to defend an indefensible position. You won't accept that there is an underlying flaw in the root of your logic.

Isn't it funny how the biggest defenders of the default trust are those setting atop it? these people are not bitcoin supporters. a supporter of bitcoin would encourage decentralized consensus proof of trust algorithm. maybe they don't understand that bitcoin is decentralized proof of trust in and of itsself, but on the same token, perhaps they are corrupted morally and feel the need to protect their bottom line, by keeping a monopoly on the trust system, and their corruption has overriden their logical thinking algorithm. food for thought :-)

Well said. I really don't think I can add anything more to this discussion.

If Hilarious and Co want to keep justifying account selling, there's obviously nothing I can do to stop them since they have the power to change things and I don't.

I will continue to keep track of sold accounts to the best of my ability and warn other users if I see them attempting to run scams.
10462  Other / Meta / Re: BITCOINTALK STAFF QUIETLY BANS PEOPLE FOR SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THEM on: October 08, 2014, 08:35:09 PM
No, it makes sense. Your argument doesn't though. You seem to think that trust is only meaningless because accounts are allowed to be sold, but whether they are or not makes no difference to the trust system because accounts will still be sold regardless. Banning the sale of accounts changes absolutely nothing, apart from maybe making people like you think they're now a little but safer, when they're not.

OK so lets just do away with pretending that the trust system actually matters then, can we?

The entire component should be removed from the forum since it is already prone to being abused.

You're like the American government trying to defend an indefensible position. You won't accept that there is an underlying flaw in the root of your logic.
10463  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Information on Edward DeLeon Hickman, NXT and CoinTelegraph on: October 08, 2014, 08:23:14 PM
looks like a 90th movie, hawaii 5-0 ? Smiley

Ah-ha.......is it one of the actors from the Hawaii Five-0 reboot ?
Don't know who the guys are, but it's always a good moment to mention Grace Park


Yeah, she's hot as holy hell. Even in person, too. Its funny that she is a female version of a male character in the original Hawaii 5-0. Much more attractive.

I think the guy on the left is the main star from the new Hawaii 5-0, the one that isn't James Caan's son.
10464  Other / Meta / Re: BITCOINTALK STAFF QUIETLY BANS PEOPLE FOR SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THEM on: October 08, 2014, 08:11:07 PM

Trust is not meaningless, it is a good starting point.

Unless you are trading with a bought account, in which case trust is absolutely meaningless.

And how can you know if you are conducting a trade with a bought account?

You can't. Ergo, Bitcointalk's trust system is meaningless.
10465  Other / Meta / Re: BITCOINTALK STAFF QUIETLY BANS PEOPLE FOR SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THEM on: October 08, 2014, 08:08:14 PM
And there'd be even less that were aware it went on if it wasn't allowed.

What? That makes no sense. If it wasn't allowed, people would know that its not allowed.

Most of the time people don't stop to even think about it. They don't stop to consider they may be speaking or trading with a bought account. Its not really up to you to decide whether or not they should know this, the simple fact is, they don't.

Trust means nothing so long as accounts are bought and sold here.

I will be happy to provide the service of listing and pointing out bought accounts for general public awareness.
10466  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Edward Hickman, Pacific Blockchain , TaunSew , Death Threat on: October 08, 2014, 07:51:16 PM

Does the person operating this account know Edward Hickman of Honolulu, Hawaii ( Pacific Blockchain )?

Joshua NxT people have threatened you and they know where you live.   Shocked

Contrary to popular beliefs, you guys are both idiots.

I don't know, maybe they are popular beliefs these days. Should be.

Can someone's paranoia actually render their intelligence sub-average?
10467  Other / Meta / Re: BITCOINTALK STAFF QUIETLY BANS PEOPLE FOR SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THEM on: October 08, 2014, 07:38:08 PM
There are pro-arguments to letting it happen, contrary to your belief, and your opinion on the matter isn't shared by everyone. And what good what banning the sale of accounts here do exactly? Suddenly make it not happen? Only a naive fool would think it would have any positive impact. It would have the exact opposite because a lot of people would then be clueless to the fact that the practise goes on. Banning account sales would literally have zero positive effect here.

Your argument is completely meaningless. How would banning account sales make the trust system any more or less valid? It wouldn't.

A lot of people are already completely oblivious to the fact that account selling goes on.

I'm just pointing out that, as things stand right now, the trust system is completely meaningless, because trust can be bought and sold instead of earned. Are you denying this reality altogether?
10468  Other / Meta / Re: BITCOINTALK STAFF QUIETLY BANS PEOPLE FOR SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THEM on: October 08, 2014, 07:19:50 PM
Exactly, but I don't think this guy is going to get it. Most people generally do seem to frown upon account selling and it's not 'endorsed' by this site or the admins. There's a difference between endorsing something and allowing something, especially something they cannot hope to or be expected to control. Also, even if account trading was banned, that wouldn't mean it's not going to happen and suddenly make trust 'meaningful' or 100% trustable.

You implicitly endorse account selling by creating "pro" arguments on its behalf. You could simply disallow open account selling on the forum, but that's too much to ask apparently.

I'm just pointing out that if you are happy with your trust system being absolutely meaningless, then by all means, carry on exactly the way you've been doing.
10469  Other / Meta / Re: BITCOINTALK STAFF QUIETLY BANS PEOPLE FOR SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THEM on: October 08, 2014, 06:57:29 PM
You guys realize the trust system is completely meaningless, right?

So long as you can buy and sell accounts, you can get trust that you didn't earn and use it to make trades with people who don't know they are trading with a bought account.

This is why account selling should be frowned upon and not openly endorsed.
10470  Other / Meta / Re: cooldgamer abuse of the trust system on: October 08, 2014, 06:54:18 PM
Now that you can buy and sell accounts with no recourse, the trust system is completely meaningless.

Think about it.
10471  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: darkcoin exploit found in 2 hours by amateur (why open source matters for anon) on: October 08, 2014, 06:26:03 PM
Something good must be coming soon to DRK to warrant this kind of attention.

Darkcoin is the worst form of anonymous coin we've tried yet... except for all of the others.
10472  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 08, 2014, 03:40:15 AM


You must bring us... ANOTHER SHRUBBERY!

Just keeping the theme going.
10473  Other / Meta / Re: How can this piece of crap is not banned and free to post fake threats here? on: October 08, 2014, 03:30:30 AM
I would say the psychological damage his attack has had on your coin is staggering...

There should be a subsection of the forum devoted for those in need of grievance counseling or psychiatric advice.
10474  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 08, 2014, 01:45:15 AM

If you have something unique and you demonstrate you are the better developer on your code than any arseholes who try to fork your project, then your premine is not a negative, it is a positive.

Yeah just like Satoshi's premine. Oh wait a minute thats right there's no such thing.

You should do your project out of the love for it.

If you do it for any other reason, people will see through it and you will fail.
10475  Other / Meta / Re: BITCOINTALK STAFF QUIETLY BANS PEOPLE FOR SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THEM on: October 07, 2014, 11:31:27 PM

Thanks. Holy hell thats impressive feedback.
10476  Other / Meta / Re: BITCOINTALK STAFF QUIETLY BANS PEOPLE FOR SPEAKING OUT AGAINST THEM on: October 07, 2014, 11:13:05 PM
This is acutally a good idea, as staff for these past days have bullying members, I seen one member get banned  for small scams and the bigger ones like TF still stay here cause hes connected.  Theymos and his staff goons are just bullies with power in this forum.  Like the government,  People you shouldnt be afraid if they ban you then this forum is not worth it, move on to others, let theymos staff and mods be the fall of him.

Who is TF?

I could figure it out but I'm lazy.
10477  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: Selling bitcointalk.org accounts on: October 07, 2014, 10:46:12 PM
Bump

What accounts are you selling? Can you list them so people who left positive feedback for them have the chance to remove it?

It seems pretty ethically dubious to sell accounts with positive trust ratings when the trust was left for that user and not your buyer. Your buyer could be a total scammer, now it appears he has a positive trust rating because he bought one of your accounts.

Not cool.
10478  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Official contest - Heres your chance to win 3 Zen Hashlets from GAWMiners :D on: October 07, 2014, 10:41:58 PM
excellent! i'll be sure to join this really cool contest.  i think you guys are the best!  looking forward to making some easy money with you (im even thinking of quitting my job)

Well did you do it? Did you quit your job?

LOL.
10479  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: October 07, 2014, 09:53:12 PM
Maybe it's time to admit everything has been said and done on this thread. Post a picture of Hitler and call it a day.

This. This and only this.
10480  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [POLL] Sick of Hearing About Monero ? on: October 07, 2014, 04:54:56 PM
STOP MAKING NEW MONERO THREADS THEN.
Pages: « 1 ... 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 [524] 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 ... 578 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!