I PM'ed drakahn my address after reading the other thread, then caught up on this thread.  I guess I may as well post the contents of the PM here:

blockparser can do that for you.

I was saying that you didn't find any of the ones I found, but I was wrong.  I was comparing the transaction IDs you listed with the sha256 hashes I listed.  Duh.

You can send a transaction without fees so long as:

* all the outputs (including change, if any) are 0.01 BTC or more
* the transaction is 10,000 bytes or smaller
* the priority is high enough

I'll address the 3 points in order:

* The first thing you're going to need to do is to get some more coins in your wallet, or you'll not be able to afford the fees (free to those that can afford it, very expensive to those that can't).  Let's suppose you add 11 bitcoins.

* To keep the transaction size down, we'll send to a single output to ourselves.  That leaves you room for 55 inputs.  One of the inputs is going to have to be the 11 bitcoins, leaving room for 54 satoshis of dust.

* Priority is determined by multiplying the age of each input by its size and summing the results then dividing by the transaction size in bytes.  In order for the transaction to be free, the average age * size needs to be around 1 BTC day.  Since the dust is never going to be old enough to contribute significantly to the priority, the 11 bitcoins is going to have to contribute enough to bring the average up.  In order to spend 11 bitcoins on their own without a fee, the 11 bitcoins should be around 1/11 of a day old.  We need them to be 55 times older than that to be spendable without a fee - so 55/11 = 5 days old.

So in summary, you can spend 54 satoshis at a time so long as you combine them with a 11 BTC coin that hasn't moved for at least 5 days.

You can then repeat the process every 5 days, adding about 54 satoshis of dust to the amount you transfer to yourself.  Since you have 1000 satoshis to transfer, this is going to take quite a long time.  Like 19 sets of 5 days, or 95 days.  You could speed the process up if you can put more than 11 BTC into the wallet.  The more value you can spend each time, the faster the priority goes up, and the less time you have to wait between transactions.  If you can add 110 BTC instead of 11 BTC then the wait time goes down from 5 days to 0.5 days between transactions.

Note: I've not tried this to see if it really works, but what I've written is pretty close to how the satoshi client works in terms of deciding which transations need a fee.

Or you could just forget about it. 

Does that mean that if I lend you my car for the weekend, you're within your rights to sell it and give me back the amount you got in dollars?

If I lend you my car, I expect to get my car back.

In the same way, if I lend you some Bitcoins, I expect to be paid back in Bitcoins.

Is the law really saying that all loans can be paid back in dollars at the borrowers discretion?

And yet Clipse seems to be sure it's legit:


Why would anyone invest with BS&T when obviously legit companies like this are offering a safe 3.3% per day?

The real Ponzi offered to double clients' money in 100 days.  That works out at:


4.97 percent per week.

That's pretty much the same as Pirate's rates.

I did something similar some months ago and found different addresses that you did:

http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/a/3170/659

You're mixing up accounts and addresses.

You can use sendfrom to send from a particular account, but that doesn't change which adress(es) the payment comes from.  The concept of 'accounts' is purely accounting within your local client and doesn't affect the generated transactions at all.

This page says you've already spent the 0.015 BTC you got for losing the bet, too.

http://www.satoshidice.com/lookup.php?tx=1iYg9mpGo shows a lot of transactions from your address as CONFIRMED.  Are there any that are still missing?

Link please?

https://blockchain.info/tx-index/14895491 is your payout transaction.

Sorry to tell you, but your bet lost.

I'm not sure either.  But I remember a thread where the creator of a dice site posted "I'm having to sell my site because it's too successful".  I think he was worried about the legal implications of running a successful but unlicensed gambling site, and I think that site is what became SatoshiDice.  I'll try to dig up the old thread and will put the URL here if I'm successful.

Edit: I can't find the thread.

I was thinking along the same lines.  Since the majority of customers are going to be net losers it might not be good for business to show them how much exactly they've lost.  Gamblers often like to believe that they "broke about even".  Presenting the true situation to them makes that harder to believe.

Oh, I see.  Yes, that's my understanding of the situation as well.

It looks to me like the recent changes are only on the 'logger' branch.

I think evoorhees is the "someone else" in the above sentence, not "the creator".  i.e. he bought it, not sold it.

Just the genesis block.

What's this about a wishing well?  Went over my head, that.