I'm sorry, I must not be reading clearly.  I could have sworn that you imagined three alternative means of justice that all involved execution, and also that you believe a silver payment and forced, terminal marriage to her sexual abuser is a good way to protect a rape victim.

Surely you must have meant something else, right?

It's not just more secure, it's infinitely more secure.

Fast-confirm coins absolutely have a niche, in my opinion.

Good to know    My unspoken position is also letting me enjoy these prices.

If you don't value others' the same, then that implies you don't believe bitcoins are fungible.

Edit:  I know you were joking.

I don't particularly like the question because it's sort of irrelevant.

When I say "sort of irrelevant," I don't mean that individual opinion doesn't matter, but this is an auction market in which trading occurs across vastly different mediums.  In this thread we've already seen personal valuations at ~200% current market rate, but this means nothing.  The posters don't even believe in their personal valuations because nobody's partaking in the 50% off sale going on all day every day.  There's money up for grabs at half-off and nobody's buying.

I just don't think it's the best interpretation to visualize the market as requiring some Universal price anchor or pricing mechanism, but rather value will be determined by localized factors as it has been.  For example, certain factors make valuation on Bitstamp different from BTC-e, and certain factors also affect valuation of BTC traded on the chain vs. off the chain.  The price of BTC on BTC-e is always lower because it's simply near impossible to directly fund your account with fiat.  The price on Local Bitcoins is simply misleading because the spreads are ridiculous and the depth isn't there.   The prices asserted in this thread are, at best, hearsay because nobody is trading at these prices.

Great, thank you for the opportunity

This post = #3533

Signature has been updated.

There is only one means of resolution:

Woo hoo!!!!!!

Actually, it's more like...
 


Hey, I run this joint, capiche?

Lol go for it dude.

Ah, you had more to say, I see.

Nope, not a cop.  Just someone who is trying to help you from digging yourself a deeper hole.

"Or dear government help me" talk?  What are you talking about?  Stay on topic.

Go ahead and put up a larger bounty for proof of something that's a product of your imagination.  I don't care.

Edit:  Lmao thanks for adding me to the list.  I suppose you think I was hired, too, eh?

First of all, you can't ruin me in court.  You can't even spell court.  Talk is cheap when people make reasonable opinions based upon some evidence, such as the statements left by others in your trust feedback.  Talk can be very expensive if you make an unfounded claim undermining the reputation of somebody else for which you know you have no evidence, which is what you have done in the feedback you have provided to several *very* respected members of this community.

Second of all, why are you telling me to bring it on?  Before this post, as far as I know I've never directed any comments towards you or your services.  I did, however, read your posts, and I agree with others' opinions that you are unprofessional in your demeanor.  

Third, libertarianism?  Lol what the hell?  How do you draw conclusions about views about politics and Bitcoin from a comment made to you about libel after you provably accused others of being scammers simply because you don't like their opinions about your behavior?

Millions of people per episode.

Really, really bad idea to call legit users scammers when all they are doing is voicing an opinion or a belief about your services.

This can be considered libel, and if you target the wrong person, particularly someone who potentially has a lot to lose from defamation, you may find yourself in a very uncomfortable legal situation you really wish you hadn't gotten yourself into...

I would like to participate in this campaign.

Edit:  I'm interested in the gold-plated ones.

I wouldn't call South Park "niche."  I saw the Book of Mormon musical -- which is basically South Park wrapped in a different package and performed live -- twice, and I'd guess there were more people in their 40's and 50's than there were people in their 20's.  I even counted dozens of senior citizens couples.

But yes, Good Wife was mainstream and it generated a noticeable uptick in Bitcoin searches that lasted for a couple days.  Overall impact on the price was fairly negligent IIRC.

That's effectively my stance.  Bitcoin as a currency is incredibly interesting, but in my opinion not nearly as interesting as the decentralized network upon which it operates.

My only point in referencing the registration date of the OP is only to highlight that this type of volatility is nothing new, and we've ebbed and flowed through these cycles before.  To say that Bitcoin is "becoming" like a pump-and-dump blah blah blah is a statement cast from a more narrow range of experience.

Date Registered:   January 21, 2014, 09:02:06 AM


^^ This is why this post thread exists.

 

Modern science isn't supposed to be good whatsoever at exploring and explaining rare events specifically because they are...rare (unreplicable).

I'm not saying I believe these photos are real, but if I believed they did, why on Earth would you need to throw out all modern science?

Why?