can i have another coin instead?

it is probably crashing any second

+1
at least a crypto2crypto-thing shouldn't be that hard to do. Why is it not here?

all the people withdrawing should be careful with qrk. Qrk is not working - no txid

exactly. Withdrawing bitcoin was disabled to let more btc pile up before they put out the notice. It was very well planned and walked through.

funds are forzen 24th today is 23rd.
Those who can read have clear advantage
And it is very clear to me that this will be the new fashion. Every other exchange one by one will claim to have been 'hacked' and steal your money. We should not let that happen. Because if we do they will repeat after round 1. Right now i am withdrawing about all coins from all exchanges. I am sick of this scammers party.  If they can't handle security, they have to raise fees to cover losses, but can't just take the funds like that! It is very close to stealing. The logic behind this is "we have been robbed so we rob someone else so that we don't have to take the losses". Every exchange that gives losses to customers should give winnings also to customers in the future. Everything else is not honest. How many percent do they cover? 100% losses goes to customer? Why not 100% tradingfees also back to customer? If they can just pass losses to customers like that why should they ever care about security?

i used it last days to trade some vtc and i am really not amused by what has happened. I have no idea why it should be ok that an exchange can steal my money at any moment. It is not. Vircurex is responsible for their security. They obviously can't handle security and i should pay now for them being unable to take care? Why should i pay for someone elses losses? I wasn't even on that exchange when the losses occured. No exchange gives back what they earn from fees - so why should they take from customers what they lost to hacks because they were incompetent? Winings occur - exchange keeps it. Losses occur - customers pay? Is it like that?
I will not come back.
Imagine this is the new fashion now. All exchanges start to steal money from customers. This is not funny. I feel violated.

What in effect is happening right now is that everybody buys all the coins they can withdraw and is out then. I feel sorry for the bagholders that are left there because they happen not to be online while everybody else buys all the withdrawable coins up 200% and leaves. Vircurex might not even be able to pay back those poor bastards left there in the end.

someone has spare two btc to send this 300% higher? For 5 btc right now you get 50% of all xjo. It is quite dangerous to hang those fruits so low.

ok. i just wanted to be sure. thanks for the info.

any updates on when the initial distribution will take place?

this is not 'just another scrypt coin' ... i am holding for sure.

i made a bit of research and i just found out btc sha256 and btc scrypt are crosscompatible and you can even open a btcs wallet in a bitcoin sha256 client ... so my fund are not lost. In fact i could use just one wallet.dat to store btcscypt and btcsha256, both coins on it... and as it seems also devcoins. Mind succefully blown.

 

brilliant! Thank you! I would think that that is the case for btc-s then. I already mailed to the exchange if they could hand me out the privatekey for the btc-s adress so i could recover the 'lost' funds. Let's hope they give it to me and it works. If so a lot of people could be happy including that friend of mine who supposedly lost his redd.
... it would mean a lot of 'lost' funds aren't lost at all... for some things you really need a hero-member ...

oh man, the question i was asking now is if a public adess in the btc-scrypt-network would have the same privatekey as the exact same public adress in the bitcoin sha256 network. If you can't answer that question or if it is beyond your horizon to even understand what is asked please don't write anything at all. Thank you. Can someone please just answer that question or tell me why it is not so? Would be much appreciated.

so i don't get an answer for the last question. Instead i am insulted? What a joke. Sorry for being not native to english ... nice community you have here.

[solved]

that is exactly not the case. Btc-s adresses beginn with a '1' same as btc adresses do and it is possible to loose coins in this way since same adresses exist in both networks. Your client doesn't reject it.

Reddcoin and redcoinadresses also beginn with an 'R' each so same adresses exist in those networks.
Go try it out yourself if you don't believe me.

edit:
i think there is potential to loose a large amount of coins with just a little bit of innatention. also i am not a stupid guy and also not particularly negligently so i think this mistake could happen to a lot of people with a lot of coins over time.

A friend of mine lost millions of reddcoin because he sent it to a redcoinadress (to red not redd)

Now i lost an amount of bitcoin because i accidentally sent them to a btc-s adress

Guys, we can't work like that. Contributing to the problem that you can send coins to adresses with the same number or letter in the beginning is that those adresses are listet next to each other on exchange. I think this is a problem and it will happen to a lot more people if nothing is done to prevent this.

please also add the mighty unobtanium. It is a monster of a coin.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=313126.0

get to know unobtanium before you kick yourself in a few weeks that you didn't take this advice.