Tss... Blacks comit more crimes simply because they're poorer. The most your poor the more likely you are to commit crimes...
You can compare Moldova with Equatorial Guinea. The former is 99.9% white country, and it is one of the poorest nations in the earth. Equatorial Guinea is an African nation, and it is perhaps the richest country in the continent. But still, the crimes rates in Moldova are much lower than those in Eq. Guinea. Ok so it's just definitively you who's never checking anything. https://borgenproject.org/poverty-in-equatorial-guinea/Equatorial Guinea is one of the poorest countries in the world. Poverty rate is at 60%, how is that anything close to rich? Please stop saying things without AT LEAST checking them. The wealth distribution in Equatorial Guinea is extremely skewed, and that is the reason for the 60% poverty rate. But look at these figures: Equatorial Guinea, GDP per capita: 11,000 USD ($23,000 in 2012) Moldova, GDP per capita: $1,800 USD ($2,000 in 2012). An average guy in Eq. Guinea is almost 10 times richer than someone in Moldova. .... no... The 60% poverty rate means 60% people live with less than 1.25$ Poverty rate of Moldava is 11% http://data.worldbank.org/country/moldovaIt means more than half of Eq. Guinea lives with 1$ or less while only 1 out of ten of Moldova are like this. So you're talking about average but this is ridiculous because inequality is far too large in Eq. Guinea. So rather logical to have higher crime rate in Eq. Guinea as people are poorer. |
|
|
|
La création de richesse se base uniquement sur la transformation de matière et l'extracation, les services ne produisent pas de richesse.
Par conséquent, tous ceux qui rendent service sont des voleurs et appauvrissent l'ensemble du monde.  C'est l'échange (volontaire) qui crée de la richesse, indépendamment de ce qui est échangé. Les gens échangent entre eux parce qu'il estiment être gagnant. Sinon ils n'échangeraient pas, tout simplement. Non mais ils ne l'enrichissent pas. La richesse reste la même. Ou est la création de richesse? Ta remarque est à mon avis pertinente: j'aime les choux et toi les navet. J'ai un navet tu as un choux. On les échange. On s'estime tous les deux gagnants. Où est la création de richesse? Il est ridicule de considérer qu'un service enrichit le monde... Please be my guest et donne moi un exemple de service qui crée de la richesse. |
|
|
|
The Europeans are really relaxed and save on army. Right Trump forces them to increase spending, but I am sure that soon with NATO, nothing will happen because any attempt by Trump to go beyond words in relation to NATO will be regarded as a blow to us security. There has not only impeachment and there is already a prison can end.
Nothing is going to happen. The American public do realize that NATO is very important for the national security. But at the same time they agree with Trump in asking the other NATO members to contribute. NATO is NOT important for anyone but USA. Or at least not for anyone in the EU. It's just that our politicians are too stupid to say fuck off to the Americans. There is no reason for us to stay in NATO, on the contrary it's very dangerous to be in it :/ |
|
|
|
Tss... Blacks comit more crimes simply because they're poorer. The most your poor the more likely you are to commit crimes...
You can compare Moldova with Equatorial Guinea. The former is 99.9% white country, and it is one of the poorest nations in the earth. Equatorial Guinea is an African nation, and it is perhaps the richest country in the continent. But still, the crimes rates in Moldova are much lower than those in Eq. Guinea. Ok so it's just definitively you who's never checking anything. https://borgenproject.org/poverty-in-equatorial-guinea/Equatorial Guinea is one of the poorest countries in the world. Poverty rate is at 60%, how is that anything close to rich? Please stop saying things without AT LEAST checking them. |
|
|
|
It seems to me that every country has its own resources to be rich and prosperous, That's all these resources belong not to people, but to oligarchs and officials. Who can Each country has a special disease and this is corruption.
It is difficult to blame privatization for all this. Look at Venezuela. They recently nationalized the oil and gas assets, along with a lot of other industries. Now Venezuela is one of the poorest nations in the world. Jesus could you stop telling blatant lies like that? Here is what nationalization brought to venezuela: http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/venezuela/overviewPoverty rate went from 50% to 30% Gini index went from 0.48 to 0.4 You're either just a spammer not checking facts or a lier. But let's be clear: Venezuela is a PERFECT EXAMPLE of what nationalization can do for a country. |
|
|
|
All the things you talk about here are nice additions to the evolution fiction. But there isn't any basic evidence supporting evolution at all, that can't be ascribed to creation even better. And there are many reasons why evolution is impossible. Three of them are, again: 1. probability math; 2. Irreducible Complexity; 3. no missing links in the fossils. There are many more.  You know that just saying that doesn't prove anything? If you want to say things give real argument. That's not what you're doing. See for yourself, that's what you're doing: "Evolution is the only possible explanation and here are 3 proofs: -Lamas -Eggs in boiling water -The size of my penis" You're saying the same thing. |
|
|
|
Legalize all psychoactives and see the incarceration rate per race equalize, at least it's the theory:).
No. That is not going to happen. You check these stats (although they are inflated for whites by considering Hispanics as part of the white race):  As you can see, blacks who are just around 13% of the population commits even more murders than whites and Hispanics combined (almost 80% of the population). COULD IT BE LINKED TO SOMETHING ELSE? I mean could it be because they're something else than blac? Let's see... What could it be... Is there a reason vor theft and violence... Oh I know! Maybe poverty! http://blackdemographics.com/households/poverty/Tss... Blacks comit more crimes simply because they're poorer. The most your poor the more likely you are to commit crimes... |
|
|
|
Hello, I'm new on this forum and also a new member of FreeBitco.in... I was wondering if the bonus is still available if I post my bitcoin address here. In that case, here's my address: 12X4zaVX1MJVFUSoYtREHLx5nHeyKDJipn
Randomguy, we have something better than that bonus now available - we pay 4% annual interest, paid daily on balances over 30,000 satoshi! If you need a link you can see my signature. Join us! Paid daily at 4% annual interest rate? You can withdraw how you want? Then it's... Not possible. Or at least I don't see how it can be. That's just a trap to get your money invested and then leave with it ^^ They are giving aprox 0.01% daily interest (400.000 satoshis get 40/day) and the rest of the faucet keeps on being the same. You also get a 25% on your referals daily interest Well it's not so difficult to believe in then. It's more or less the interest rate you get from a bank in fact ^^ A bit more in traditional banking to be honest. |
|
|
|
La création de richesse est générée par les échanges. Plus il y a d'échanges, plus il y a de richesses créées. Les matières premières (les "ressources") font partie de ces échanges mais sont (devenues) négligeables par rapports aux services. Par ailleurs, il ne faut pas oublier Lavoisier : "Rien ne se perd, rien ne se créé, tout se transforme".
Une "ressource" ne disparait pas, elle se transforme. Cette nouvelle ressource participe aux échanges, pour peu qu'on lui trouve une utilité.
Conclusion: la croissance est potentiellement infinie (autant que l'imagination humaine) mais elle ne se décrète pas. Elle est la conséquence des échanges.
Pardon donc la croissance est infinie à condition que les scientifiques arrivent toujours à trouver une utilité supérieure aux ressources. Donc la richesse vient bien uniquement de l'extraction et la transformation de ressource d'ailleurs... Du coup baser son économie sur de la croissance c'est pas con, c'est juste foncer tout droit sur une falaise et dire aux scientifiques "allez les gars, construisez le pont assez vite parce que nous on court". La création de richesse se base uniquement sur la transformation de matière et l'extracation, les services ne produisent pas de richesse. Y a que les traders pour essayer de te faire croire ça. Donc vouloir la croissance infinie c'est juste dire "mon modèle n'est viable que si on continue d'innover toujours plus". Si un jour on arrive pas à innover assez et assez vite ça pète. Ben en tant que scientifique je trouve ça très con oui... Aujourd'hui on a besoin de croissance dans le mileur énergétique et... Ben désolé les gars mais on arrive pas à aller assez vite quoi. Oui on a des pistes mais non on va peut-être pas y arriver assez vite. |
|
|
|
|
Ok this rakeback integrated to the site is awesome!!
Normally rakeback is something you CAN have but only through other shady websites xD
|
|
|
|
BOUM! Well guys that's a little bit of an event here. Sorry but I'm a bit moved. Wouldn't think we would reach this level when I bought my btc at 400$  |
|
|
|
|
Not totaly true because you need a computer and an internet connexion.
So it's common in developped countrie but not in all ^^
|
|
|
|
Wrong.
Science is not a religion. You say that theories are acknowledged by scientists to not be facts?
Well that's the very difference between theories and theorems... But only few theories remain. Most science aspects have been proven right now.
Could you give an example of a scientific theory that is not proven? Cause the only ones I see are... Well no scientist "believe in them" they just find those theories interesting and we think it MIGHT be the answer but that's all.
I agree with you that science is not religion. So you are wrong with your "wrong," because I didn't say that science is religion. Belief in science theory as fact is religious belief.
Looks like you didn't say that the first time.
If science theories had been proven, they would be science laws. The fact that they remain theories shows that they have not been proven.
Most of them are laws yeah... Do you have an example of what is called a theory and not a law? People who believe unproven things to be fact, have religion going for themselves. Science theories are not religion. Only the people who believe that they are factual when it is not known, are the people who have a religion going for themselves in the science theories. Nobody says that... I don't understand what you're saying... |
|
|
|
$1900 at Finex again, $8 short of ATH  Another day, another ATH. Meanwhile, true Bitcoin holders be like: 
On the other side of the Spectrum, "altcoin bagholders", "propagandists", and "paid shills" are like: "Look at the mempool!!! Bitcoin is dead!".
I'll get a little excited if we break $2k on Bitstamp and stay there. still, not a little excited about the price always coming back?  I don't know, every time I see the price down to 1700$ I wonder if I should bet on long and every time I lack the guts to do it. But from here it seems the price always comes back! |
|
|
|
The head of the FBI James Komi said that Russia is the biggest threat on Earth. He said this at the Senate hearings on the influence of Russia on the elections of 2016 in the United States. He noted that Russia - "this is the biggest threat of all on Earth, on the basis of its intentions and capabilities
Like it's anything new. USA obsession for socialism, russia and communism will never cease unless they actually explode. Funny thing is that the rest of the world would probably agree on the fact that USA is the biggest threat on earth. Really? NATO is just the US protecting Europe and Japan and don’t attack anybody who isn’t doing bad things (like Syria using poison gas on their own citizens). I think anybody who says the US is the biggest threat to the world is just angry it’s success. *cough cough* Iraq and Afghanistan war *cough cough* Pinochet and Cuba *cough cough* Financing every terrorist organization of Middle East Clearly not a threat to anyone |
|
|
|
The Japanese royal family may be the most endangered of its kind in the world. There are just four individuals in the line of succession for the throne, and only one of them is less than 50 years old. Perhaps they should seriously consider adopting members from the other royal families (a practice which they abandoned during the allied occupation after the WW2). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_of_succession_to_the_Japanese_throneOr maybe they would consider disappearing as they're just completely useless people actually costing money to the country. |
|
|
|
The head of the FBI James Komi said that Russia is the biggest threat on Earth. He said this at the Senate hearings on the influence of Russia on the elections of 2016 in the United States. He noted that Russia - "this is the biggest threat of all on Earth, on the basis of its intentions and capabilities
Like it's anything new. USA obsession for socialism, russia and communism will never cease unless they actually explode. Funny thing is that the rest of the world would probably agree on the fact that USA is the biggest threat on earth. |
|
|
|
|
Ah ok you talk about this
I thought you were talking about simple flu, just the flu you know the normal usual flu.
For the others... Well it's a bit strange to get vaccinated on a disease that stil doesn't exist ^^'
I can understand why people do it but it seemsa bit... Excessive to me.
|
|
|
|
Vaccinations become obsolete every year, because new viruses are constantly appearing and it will be more effective to improve immunity in a healthy way, rather than letting all kinds of vaccines.
Virus mutations are rare, but deadly. A perfect example is that of the influenza virus. It mutates very frequently, which makes it extremely difficult for the scientists to develop vaccines. But the other viruses, such as Polio and smallpox have remained stable for the past hundreds of years. So vaccines work 99% of the time, but for the remaining 1%, we don't have any remedy. Thanks for telling us about deadly virus mutations which are rare. This shows that beneficial mutations don't come about at all, and evolution couldn't have happened. Dead viruses are dangerous. Stop vaccinations. For example, in order not to get sick with flu, it is enough to avoid hypothermia, maintain your immunity with vitamins and observe personal hygiene rules. Only every year they impose new vaccines against new influenza viruses that appeared earlier than the virus itself. It's all business. The flu vaccine is a Scam. There are many varieties of flu, and everyone against the vaccine. Never know what kind of virus will be distributed this year. You're not going to do a dozen vaccinations. Your immune system is the best vaccination against influenza virus. It's not a scam it's very important... If you don't get flu vaccine you're going to get sick and the disease is hardly curable without antibiotics. And the problem is that antibiotics seem to have disastrous effects on long term... |
|
|
|
Atheists don't even realize that they are not atheists. They CAN'T be atheists. Why not? Because atheism says that God does not exist. Yet atheists all know that God might exist somewhere they haven't examined, yet, like at the bottom of the ocean, or on Mars, or in some other galaxy.Since atheists know this, they are only TRYING to be atheists. And it will always be difficult for them to be atheists, at least until they have examined the whole universe to see if God doesn't exist somewhere. Atheism is self-contradictory. Ok so because it MIGHT exist we can't deny it? So I guess we also have to believe in the unicorns because they might be on mars or wherever... The simple fact of hearing about the suggestion of God, makes you to have an opinion about God in both ways: 1. belief in His existence; 2. belief that He does not exist. Since you know that He might exist, means that you are not an atheist. This doesn't stop you from denying on the outside, formally, into the public. It only shows what you really believe through all your denial. There might be real unicorns somewhere in the history of the earth. They might not exist alive, now. But there may be fossils. Great. So everything might exist. Incredible. Then it means we can't discuss anymore because there is nothing to argue on. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
