Improved speed over LTC and BTC

Improved security over WDC and DGC

seriously you have 8 decimal places why do you need to generate more than 1 coin per block?

Balanced block reward throttling

~1 random super block each difficulty change

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=220919.0

I might add more ideas before it is over but development will begin as soon as I raise 1 BTC

You could essentially consolidate all coins into 1. A new coin and client. The new coin would be  as close to stable as a coin can be by undetirmined means We will call it xcoin. Inside the client for xcoin all other coins can be bought and traded with xcoin. If you got enough acceptance you could essentially dominate. all others coins purpose would be to trade for xcoin to be used for services. You could make mining xcoin not profitable but have transaction fees going to nodes to support the "generating" of xcoin. I doesnt even have to be mining. It would take some innovation. Maybe im too tired to be trying to explain this. Anyone get what im saying?

i'll read through your ideas and explanations, are you a coder? That is one issue we always forget to consider, My thoughts on the next gen of alts is to basically start from scratch, writing the entire code myself. It may take half a month or two if i use the main.cpp for references, (the one everyone has raped) to have a fully functional code. And due too the untrustworthy nature of some of the individuals on this forum, it makes it hard to have a large dev team of up to ten members.

i do not attack ideas, i asked for the reasons why this is viewed as innovation, if you look at the current state of affairs between monetary policies and fiscal policies manipulating exchange rates and inflation you will realize the fallacy in that line of thought (in my opinion). There is a lot of wealth in the world, and if we were to try and create a crypto-currency the factors involved would first lead to hyper-inflation as the market demands more and as they gain more uses, this would continue until we reach a balance, at which time we would reach a balance and then know the actual value of the currency and what it can achieve. What you are talking about is called deterministic monetary collusion, where by setting such parameters we essentially make miners rich yet that defeats the purpose of wide spread adoption. Such thoughts are novel when we have other forms of backing for the currency, but we dont, ergo the market should decide unril we find a crypto that can back it's self. Today if the price of bitcoin fell to ten cents, all the cryptos would fail and it would be essentialy worthless in real world terms. A currency nomatter if it is paper, rocks or zeros in your wallet must have a measure of accepted value worldwide for it to be deemed acceptable, in the old days, paper money represented a share of gold, ergo gold (accepted everywhere) was the backer. We cannot back cryptos with existing currencies of countries because they are susceptible to any changes in that particular economy.

That is how money works, so for us to begin attempting to meddle with money supply issues, we would end up exactly where we are now. The only factor is the total limit of the number of coins, which are then sub0divisible. When you factor these numbers in, you will see what i speak of, if a  large group invested today and decided to make Yacoin their currency, the demand would be high, price would spike and more miners will mine, up till the market is satisfied. See the bitcoin bubble of april.

I respect that you are holding off during the shit storm


Now, its my understanding, that, when it runs out of mineable coins, the network will screech to a halt. No blocks, means no miners. No miners, means no confirmations. No confirmations, no transactions. Coins can't be moved around. Thoughts?

don't make suggestions you can't back up. explain to us why that is innovative, throwing bullet points and pretending to be smart says otherwise.

Trying to balance coin inflation and demand is like trying to sent prices and interest, that is not the purpose of crypto-currency, in a way you are suggesting a form of market control which is  self-defeating. If you know what "free market" mean, you'd understand that it's the markets that decide on those factors and any tampering with that mechanism is trade control.

I agree, there's a few coins that are doing well; the 'classics', like litecoin, and some new ones, like WDC/DGC/Phenix(i'm in doubt here)/maybe some I forget..

But most of these either bring something new (fast times/proper retargets/nice launches/great communities) while the most just bring CRAP (mindless clones of previous new coins/premined shit/stupid names + logo's) purely meant for enriching the dev.

Does Amazon sell "B"ullshit?

Hey fucktard,
stop spamming the forum. One thing to make a joke, another to just post crap.

actually, i think this is kinda funny, since this is the exaggeration of what's actually happening. i see this as a protest post against the insanity of everything that is released, and as such, i love this coin with all my hate.

by spamming useless threads your asking to get banned