Hi guys I just want to share you my method in gamblinv which I use it in satoshimine and dice site. This method is not a 100% winning chance but it is a high percentage of winning than losing. Just open up your initial fund as like as 0.001 btc or 0.002 btc. Then setup your goal profit to 0.005btc-0.01 btc. Bet as your instinct. Double or triple your bet if necessary to be able to reach easily your goal profit. Qiit the game if you win and play again tomorrow.
Bet as your instinct? Then definitely it's all about luck. There's no such standpoint nor foundation. Double or triple your bet if necessary to be able to reach easily your goal profit? It's obvious what will happen if you that. You know why you called that method of yours as good? It's because you got a nice winning stats using that. It's just that you are lucky every gambling session. But believe me, I doubt it will take you in a long run. |
|
|
|
I dont think that the price of the bitcoin will rise above the 700 dollar and that is just becuase lots of people dont want to sell their coins and just holding is not what you need to do when ytou want the price to rise.
If the price increase will start at the current price rate (which is around $630), breaching $700 is just a piece of cake. When there's a price rally, a common increase is about around $100-$200 in a short period of time or even more. So in here, if some cases the rally will start in of these days, reaching $700 can be done even for 24 hours. Just expect a sudden price decrease after. |
|
|
|
I agree that in sports betting we can bale to make a profit. But here also we need luck, Yes in sports betting it's 50 -50 chance are there, if you go for low odds bet then the winning chances is high, but the profit is low, if you want big profit then you have to play with high amount, but sometimes if lose your bet means it's big lose for you. So you want to make money in gambling means you have to take the risk.
Yes sports betting is really profitable but luck here must be accompanied by the gambler itself. How? Wise betting, wise selection and choose what sports they have really known. Even using martingale betting here is effective low odds to loss at 7 or more consecutive losses. It's not that you have to choose the low odds but a "fair" and "reasonable" odds that worth to place a bet. Anyways about that gambling with no lose, we can't called it gambling now if it's no lose. Therefore, it has to be another term. |
|
|
|
What do you think about Directbet NBA Pre-season championship odds? 1.78 for Golden State and 4.30 for Cleveland Cavaliers. All other teams almost have no chance according to odds. I think we'll see a surprise winner odd-wise.
NBA Championship 2016/17
Golden State Warriors @ 1.78
Cleveland Cavaliers @ 4.3
San Antonio Spurs @ 10
Los Angeles Clippers @ 20
Boston Celtics @ 23
Portland Trail Blazers @ 24
Others @ 30+
AS OF NOW, the odds are just fine and reasonable. While NBA is on progress, expect a sudden change of odds, well that is normal. So for a bettor, wait a bit more at least before the NBA All-Star before looking again at NBA 2016/17 odds.  |
|
|
|
See, if you buy anything using traditional payments, you have to give your personal details.The government could easily track your earnings and levy taxes. But in Bitcoins, there is no need to give any personal details.
It was just for payments how they can monitor the earnings? Also this practice is present up to today, does it hurt harder in most of the cases? And besides, a legit store that offers payment windows must follow the rules about money transactions law so it's a must if they at least know some of the personal details of the customers. |
|
|
|
My concern is, is that worth of his time?
Or any Campaign manager's time to for the money they get?
People have different preferences on how they valued their time as worth one so as the campaign managers. If they find their work worth it at any given rate then that's it. Or how much they actually get periodically from campaigns?
Campaign managers have different rates. So even giving a price range is kinda difficult so better ask them and if you really want to know then just hope they will gave you an answer. |
|
|
|
Given the fact that there are only 21M bitcoins, one could wonder if bitcoin was designed for a few selected or first few adopters and not to be a global currency in a world with +7 billions people.
As far as my knowledge and own opinion is concern, bitcoin was designed to somehow changed the current system of sending and receiving money. With bitcoin we can really say it's far less hassle than the usual one. So in here, it was designed in that kind of purpose and not on the people itself. What happens 40 years from now when most of the people on earth turn to using crypto currency? simply use alt coins when they see bitcoin already in hands of a few hundreds people and not wanting to be manipulated by them or even by 1m coins of satoshi?
If most of the people will use cryptocurrency 40 years from now, then it must be on mulitple cryptos hence those bitcoin will not be used by all people in the world and that 21 million is enough since bitcoin is divisible by 8 decimal units. But believe me in 40 years, cryptos will not dominated the fiat currencies. Can't we have a second version of same code with same team and the same credibility developing it?
No. That's it. |
|
|
|
From the 3 online wallets you mentioned Coinbase seems to stand the most against bitcoin principles.
By using their services you basically give up your privacy and exchange it for convenience?
It is widely known that Coinbase and Xapo are monitoring your every transaction and will lock your account in case something is "wrong".
For those supported countries, it's quite not wrong if they ask for your main information since they are complying with money laws by country. It's just a part of securites to ensure the safety of the customers. About the last part of your post, well if they sees any wrong then it's obvious that is a eligible for account locked. The investigation must take place then. |
|
|
|
Also their faucet which is 0.00000326 BTC is not so big and from my experience it's impossible to win more there like they claim. To tell the truth I had been winning there $0.2 in BTC several times but it was long time ago, more than a year ago to be more accurate. I think the site was sold after that and the new owners are not so generous.
Their reward is common since bitcoin price is thoroughly increase compare to year ago. Back in my faucet days, freebitco was one of the highest paying faucet. I even got 100k satoshis in just one claim, just didn't remember what tier is that. Also weekly Im getting 50-70k satoshis from my referral commissions meaning there is really an active claimers back then. |
|
|
|
it has come down a bit (lost around half of its peak value). if supports continue, i think it will remain here. they have a roadmap on their website and looks like they are adhering to it. lets see what happens. your predictions have already come through
That is expected in every alts as hard pump always accompanied by hard dump to secure profits and be able to bought again at cheap price. And besides if people are eyeing for those good "speculations" and future progress about this crypto, they will continue to play with the price.
i bought at 7k tho, hope it will went up to 50k it it get added to bitrex or polo :0
Hold, take advantage at dip etc. Need extra ammos though. Goodluck. |
|
|
|
I guess one advantage of starting really small is that you learn the techniques without making huge losses. You will grow your capital with time and experience.
I also think that no amount limit is here in trading, but always better to start trading with a small amount, because in this way, we can get experience and knowledge, and i am agree with you that later on with the passing of time, we should grow our capital in trading. By any possible means, a newbie trader must grow while building trading experience despite losses and regrets since that is really part of doing trades. Starting a small amount is really a good practice so that newbie can have some glimpse on how actual trades work. And yes, as time passes by they must increase their trading funds since more funds on action = more profits. |
|
|
|
Meanwhile, what I have notice now is that the Houston Rockets are getting better now under D. Anthony, it seems like they can compete with tough teams in the west with the way they play.
Houston Rockets Western Conference standing average at around 7th rank so in here we can say that even with the tough teams in the West they can sealed a playoffs spot.
Houston Rockets Notebook: James Harden's Plan to Shut Up the Haters |
|
|
|
Like what I said above, this is the challenge of Steve Kerr on how he will blend his three superstars without the act of incompatibility since those three have quiet same position on the floor. Leadership is somehow the question here since I think Klay Thompson is now the bossy in their roster after he outshined Steph Curry in terms of playoffs performance and he is the most productive one when GSW survives at OKC's 3-1 lead and the recent finals.
But well, if Durant really needs a ring he must cooperate with the pioneers there and I think in just few games he can adjust.
Whoever the leader on the field is, doesnt really matter as long as they can perform like they used to be. It will be hard for kerr to join them. They might play by taking turn to showoff their skills which kinda makes me thrill to see it, obviousky some rivalry between them is going to show up soonThat's what Im trying to say since they have the same gameplay. But also like I said above, it's just a matter of few games and eventually they can be adjusted accordingly for what Kerr likes. So pre-season games is the best place to cover up those minor concerns about incompatibility. And hey they are already in the league for many years now so they are matured enough already to cover those concerns. |
|
|
|
Oh.. well... Show to the person in charge (irfan) all the details to support your claims since he needs also some respond to the one that is accused to be fair to both parties. Well I believe in you somehow but to minimize the work and for a quick response, at least you may help the organizer to clear things up. Stating "that is mine" isn't enough. Well I know you have some ammos there so show them whatever it is. |
|
|
|
In the beginning, this wasn't such a problem, since people didn't do this kind of stuff.
Nowadays, I occasionally see signatures with BBCode art that are stolen from other signatures. Let's not call any names here.
Is this allowed? Do we have to put copyright licenses under each signature in order for this not to happen?
If in a case that people saw a copycat or some close modification to that design, they can call the attention of those people in charge of the competition so that further investigation will take placed and sanctions (lol) will be applied to those guilty. Much better if both parties can backup their claims for a quick conclusion/s. There actually was no modification of the part of the BBcode art. To give an example of one, this was copied-and-pasted directly to a new signature: It took me about an hour to make this, it's a shame if this can just be used in another signature for no effort at all. What sig campaign or service is that? Please link here. |
|
|
|
During the era of the Big 3 in Miami, it was not actually that easy for the Heat to really adjust to their new roles. Remember those losing streaks and arguments with their coach? Chris Bosh had to learn how to shoot more from the outside while Dwayne Wade had to accept the fact that he can't be the main man anymore. I think the Warriors are going to experience the same thing in the beginning but they are going to be fine in the long run.
Maybe, but I wanted to point out something here, Durant aint Lebron. They have a different style of playing and obviously Lebron James is a dominant player inside the court that Durant is not based on my opinion. Steve Kerr is a great coach and I think Durant will fit in their strategy. I'm not saying Spoelstra is bad, but there is still difference in thier coaching. With that, Durant will adjust quickly. Like what difference? It's more complicated to make 3 guys on the floor with the same style rather than those Miami Heat big 3 where even has a different role still hard to adjust. Curry , Thompson and Durant are all main man. It will be more effective if one of them will step down to make room for another and in this case it must be Durant. Wanna know why Wade put trust on Lebron? He sees Lebron as a great teammate and can be a leader of their team that's why he step down. He clearly see how James lift the CAVS in their first final apperance despite of struggles in the playoffs. Do you think Curry and Thompson has the same thinking about Durant? Like what I said above, this is the challenge of Steve Kerr on how he will blend his three superstars without the act of incompatibility since those three have quiet same position on the floor. Leadership is somehow the question here since I think Klay Thompson is now the bossy in their roster after he outshined Steph Curry in terms of playoffs performance and he is the most productive one when GSW survives at OKC's 3-1 lead and the recent finals. But well, if Durant really needs a ring he must cooperate with the pioneers there and I think in just few games he can adjust. |
|
|
|
Because of that feature all of the users of bitcoin like bitcoin as they are free with their coins and do not put their money into any other person account to use them online. Bitcoin mean freedom with our money while paypal is a third party and we do not remain any control on our money when we transfer them to our paypal account.
Bitcoin isn't fully owned by a person nor has a freedom on their own coins if in a case they don't hold their own private keys. So storing it on online wallets or bitcoin exchanges is just the same as keeping fiat on a third party service. Bitcoin is a currency, Paypal is a company so it's really usual if we see some strict rules and horrible fees in Paypal although in my case I didn't experience any of it. So if people wants bitcoin then go on bitcoin, same goes for using Paypal. |
|
|
|
We can see that a lot of altcoins die just after its ICO but that is because the developers after getting a lot of money do not care any more for their currency and the investors do not have much experience and maybe will not have time to work for the currency they have invested in so with no support that coin go die.
But with bitcoin we cannot think like that as it is a major crypto currency and there are a lot of developers working for its success and the investors bring good time for it.
Well in the first place, other altcoin are just made to make some profits. If ever the community will support then the development will continue. That's why I never believe in other altcoin * in terms of technology and future plan or projects circulating in that particulat coin. But the interesting part here, since other alts are just made for profits purposes * , we can really ride the trend of being a bullish and bearish. Just always take a look at their price especially those new coins on ICO period. *my own set of alts that fall under the category of profit purposes
*in my own view |
|
|
|
Currently price is trying to break $600 but still lots of selling force is trying to push the price down under $600. What you guys think can this October bring another good pump pushing price well above $700 ?
If we are to based on the current price movement, no we can't see $700 this month since it just rebounding around the so called "bottom price" of $600. What things must happen to make a ladder to $700? Price rally and some news. Big whales must start some panic in some of the famous exchanges. If in 2 or 3 exchanges they will succeed other excangers will follow the trail and the result, price increase. Just be cautious since it will followed by a large price decrease of those people who are securing profits. |
|
|
|
For me it must be balanced money,knowledge and luck. Because without enough money you are not able to gamble. And if you have money but you don't have enough knowledge or strategy that is not complete.
So you really need to have luck and all of it just to be balance if you wanted to become a successful gambler.
And what is the used of having a big bankroll if it will not be properly managed. It will just result for a comfortable gambling since they will not feel the loss due of having a big funds. And the result? They will not noticed that their bankroll is slowly decreasing. If people really wants to make some good money out of doing gambling, make sure all factors are taking into consideration. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
