What kind of script?
What's in your mind?
|
|
|
Completamente fake. É só dar uma olhada no book da própria que você vai ver que ele não condiz com os números do suposto volume. A liquidade é baixissíma comparada a outras exchanges grandes como BitcoinTrade, Mercado Bitcoin, etc...
|
|
|
You are right. Those discussions should be about new forum software, not about this old smf forum
I believe we can always create an issue on Epochtalk's GitHub repo asking for specific features. Since the devs lurk there (and not here), they should see it and maybe implement it more easily. https://github.com/epochtalk/epochtalk/issues
|
|
|
The watchlist function doesn’t work for those who use it to quickly view all the new threads on their favorite boards (like me). I would do as suggested above and start using the Pocket extension (apparently, you can tag your bookmarks and group them, which is a plus).
|
|
|
Not all mixers use this “unique code” to avoid receiving their old coins. But for those who do, that’s the explanation I got from BestMixer from when I asked them about this specific functionality they use. And how does the code thing works? How can you link someone's mixed coins to a code (to avoid receiving the same coins and to give special discounts to 'loyal users') and ensure anonymity at the same time? It's very simple. We mark each address in our pool (only the address, but not binding to the visitor of the website) with a unique key, that does not allow anybody to get the same coins back when re-use BestMixer service. Of course there is no way of knowing if all the other mixers function this way, but due to their anonymous nature, I assume they do something similar (unless they are a honey pot).
|
|
|
What’s wrong with your browser’s bookmark option?
Create a folder for BitcoinTalk and keep the posts saved there.
|
|
|
Wait. Are we sure we're talking about an HD wallet here? 'cause I created mine just a few months after they switched to it, and was asked for an email address when I registered. When was your wallet created? You sure there's 12 words in your seed? not more than that?
so I have very old wallet, that was created few years ago.
No email was used to register(it was allowed at the time).
I also had one a few years ago and they didn’t ask for an email.
|
|
|
Can you make the bot detect and notify you when someone mentions you inside a tag (bold, italic, size, etc)? I’ve seen many users do some kind of bold+bigger size mention when answering people.
|
|
|
Do a true black one like this and you will have my merit.
|
|
|
I don’t think there is anything you can do. There is no way to recover the wallet ID without an email or backup file, and only the password isn’t enough. Also, their support (most likely) can’t help you as well (it’s still worth a try tho).When did you create the wallet? Since it’s very old, I don’t think you may have a chance of getting the wallet id from a past visit by checking your browser history, right? Edit: ok, so there is a chance. Looks like they do wallet look ups from their support. I guess you already contacted them? If not, do it here: https://support.blockchain.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=360000020183
|
|
|
So, what is there? Ripple is not supported with Trezor One, only Trezor Model T. Is it because not implemented yet, or is not technically possible?
Maybe not yet. But this makes me think that they will support it in the future: Trezor One, firmware update 1.8.0 In order to fix the security vulnerability announced in December, we have updated the way that Trezor One stores data so that it follows the more advanced, secure procedure followed by Model T. We are also currently in the process of backporting the modern, flexible, and functional code architecture from Model T to Trezor One, to ensure that Trezor One will always remain fully up-to-date. https://blog.trezor.io/latest-updates-bring-new-architecture-to-trezor-one-and-ripple-support-to-model-t-3873ed3693c1
|
|
|
I though when someone got positive feedback from DT member they must attain trust score as well,atleast one.
Where? You must be talking about the risked amount. That's not necessary and only means something to the score when it increases (with time). Example: - If you want to make a rating stronger, increase "Risked BTC". 50 extra risked BTC is equivalent to an additional rating.
For the score number (the first 0): The first number is the user's trust score calculated based on how consistently they've received positive feedback. Probably no one will get a score above 0 until the system has been around for at least a month. The second number is the number of reported scams. The third number increases with the number of positive reports, as does the fourth number in parenthesis, though the fourth number is more resistant to abuse. This text changes color depending on the score. Users with a negative score (attainable through scamming) get a red warning attached to their posts.
It's not only possible to have a score of 0 for a few days after the trust was placed, but when the system was implemented, everybody had a score of 0 because it requires time to increase.
|
|
|
Like I said above, nutildah has a negative feedback based on DT (Default Trust). If you have a custom trust list, you may not see it in the same way.
Having trust score of 0: -0 / +1 really not possible. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Why wouldn't it be? The "trust score" increases with time. A positive feedback (made today by Hhampuz) isn't going to score you any trust score. That's why the first digit is a 0.
|
|
|
Really? This is what I saw, temporarily, on the profile page of nutildah. Trust: -1: -1 / +1
You don't have a custom trust list, so you see his trust based on DT feedbacks (iCEBREAKER's DT2 negative feedback). This is how I am seeing nutildah’s trust score ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Trust: 5: -0 / +2Meanwhile, you have a custom trust list. I don't know which feedback you see, but you have someone on your list's Depth 1 or 2 that left him a positive feedback.
|
|
|
May I know what is this for?
If it's just for IPA apps signing, you can get something like Appdb Pro which costs ~$18/month.
|
|
|
I can vouch if the software really works if you want.
PM me.
|
|
|
|