|
2 Sat buy wall is loaded up to 10btc now..
not long before 3 sat wall is eaten up and we start ignition toward 10+
|
|
|
|
microCoin is definitely ready to sky rocket - its been bubbling for a few months....id get your orders stacked up now  |
|
|
|
You are all blinded, how many of you said the same of Spaincoin? a lot of you are now bagholders, it will not see the dizzy heights of 90k any time soon, if ever. Another big dump will push it down to 15-20k. Very, very few coins have taken a hit like this and recovered.
you are blind if you dont see difference betwen taht 2 coins..SPA was just 50% premine scam coin ..copy off zilion similar coins before..it even had hard fork ..this coin has no inflation at all and dont have army ASIC race BC doesn't have any other features or services to provide it any real value - just like SPA |
|
|
|
|
its going to tumble down below 30k any minute now
|
|
|
|
This is a wallpaper.
It may contain traces of nuts, stupid dummy text, typos, and even stylistic devices which are not suitable for logos.
This is not a logo. This is a wallpaper.
Im in love.... I think that should be our motto "We go dark" |
|
|
|
|
it wont work, quit while u are ahead
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely Darkcoin - decentralised master nodes which rewards and punishes the nodes based on behaviour. First x11 algo which reduces temps/electricity... I see it as the only viable mainstream option at this point.
Darkcoin gives 99.999% anonymity with an architecture model that is almost impossible to attack once open sourced. Id say the NSA is the only one that has a remote chance.
Zerocoin/Zerocash is too complex and has too many avenues to be exploited, - I don't see this becoming mainstream / trusted or can be used for micro-payments mainstream.
Bytecoin - The anonymity and ring signatures I think is a serious contender if another coin implemented its code. Byte is already 80% mined and most probably very centralised in its distribution so I don't see it taking off.
|
|
|
|
|
WTF 112 BTC BUY WALL ON CRYPTSY NOW
|
|
|
|
|
DONT do it - Bitcoin had the same problems in the beginning. Once the coin starts to be utilised for DarkSend and to purchase goods - the distribution will even itself out over time as liquidity increases.
The idiots who keep spreading the instamine FUD do the same thing with every coin....
Get DarkSend out of beta and open sourced - get the professional marketing of the coin finalised and this will be a thing of the past.
|
|
|
|
|
If the goal is mass adoption and a competitor to bitcoin then I believe it needs to change its name.....Dark does associate itself with something underground etc....That will hold it back in the longrun.
Because its anonymous at heart, has all the right components to be a mainstream currency it needs a name to reflect that.
But it needs to be spot on and branded professionally to ensure success...
invisipay, iCash (invisible-cash) ..I don't know....look at the name Google...when the creators first said it they would have been like WTF....but now its a household name....maybe it doesn't even need the word, coin, cash etc in it
|
|
|
|
|
they cant because every response is deleted. Don't waste your time here.
|
|
|
|
|
Reported to have Cryptohunter's account deleted from the forums.
I suggest everyone does the same.
|
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter, those "facts" that you keep repeating in your posts are not "facts" because there is NO PROOF to support them.
You are just copying what another member said in their post!!!!!!!!!!
They are statements until confirmed with HARD EVIDENCE....you are such a drama queen on these forums...
Go on - delete this too so you can fuel your satisfaction for power tripping and drama. Then you can have the entire thread to yourself as you can see, the majority of the reply's are just you and what you agree with
|
|
|
|
18.5gh things are just starting to warm up around here  |
|
|
|
|
wowow just read through and my brain just exploded on the floor....Evan and Anonymint - thank you both for the great debate and discussions!
Lets make Darksend the best it can be!
|
|
|
|
dumb idea.. X11 is a rip off of Quark's algo with a couple more *pointless algo's tacked on just to say it's different. and it also would not help anything either.. X11 is asic vulnerable and insecure and a rip off Quark / Secure coin etc What you should have asked is should it be changed to Quark's algo (which was made way before the copy cat scammers came along) the fact you asked shows me you have enjoyed been fed X11 propaganda lol ease up on the Purple Kooliad and when they tell you to put on the Nike's to get ready for a space journey to the home world on Hale bop.. just say no and run  and no i don't expect 98% of you to get what i said either.. Reddiots are too busy tapping and swiping in class these days to learn much  #everythingwedoisamazing1111 I mine x11 because its less heat, less electricity and better for the environment.... Why would I keep going with scrypt when there is something better? I don't care where it was ripped quark etc..it has tangible benefits and can achieve the same results as scrypt with less electricity, heat etc... Sure its not ASIC proof and again there is no such thing so why harp on about it? |
|
|
|
Design B: Users provide inputs, outputs and collateral at once. In this case the master node knows who is sending money to who, but later it can tell who didn’t sign.
I’ve chosen to use design B (users will add inputs and outputs at the same time) because it’s the only design that can’t be attacked in the way you’re saying.
Okay he has confirmed that you are not anonymous to the master node, as I wrote upthread would be the case if he associates the collateral transaction with both input and output stages of the CoinJoin. eduffield I would like to say that is not acceptable because for the same reason I don't want to use mixer or laundry website, I can't know if the master node is an NSA honeypot. I would like to suggest you think about my divide-and-conquer idea as another electable option for users. If there is failed stage, then divide the inputs into two groups. Then ask for outputs again. Divide and conquer as necessary, then the join will complete. Not ideal, but at least you don't break anonymity and require trust of the master node. Best of luck with it. Thanks AnonyMint! You are the real deal in anonymityland James What he suggests is unlikely, but even if some nodes are run by the NSA, which is likely, why not?, then they might get info for one transaction. Big deal, they can't always be the master node, there are too many other nodes running. And to "fix" such a minute problem, or possible issue, one would have to complicate the system to such a degree, I am certain you'd create more holes than you can cover up. sounds good, in practice it's a disaster. KISS, Is the way I think it should go. That Anonymint will never understand, as he keeps going on and on about the same half dozen issues. It's like conspiracy theories. yah, they could have happened, but how likely is it? With other more reasonable explanations and the fact that the government is so dang inept. It's just silly. It's even more unlikely if we require the master nodes have 1000DRK and it would elect them from the whole network. That way if there's 5000 capable master nodes, it would cost 5000*1000DRK to de-anonymize 50% of the transactions. Seems like a good compromise. PS. If one user doesn't sign, the whole process needs to restart. Which really just means the master node will ask all users to resubmit their inputs/outputs/signatures and will charge the user. I think this is really good. It addresses the key points of anonymity in its essence even if it doesn't. All you really have to do is to make the process more expensive than what they can afford to spend on it. Say they were after the heavy criminals that would be 0.01% of the people using Darksend. Which give the rest of the users 99.999 % anonymity (in its essence) Why would they want to spend this much on your information when you are not flagged for anything or something that will result in a 50 fine ticket - or just get info, period. So one approach is to make it as expensive as possible, in whatever way. Thoughts? This is genius - especially when the price rises, so does the cost to obtain any information albeit with a very high chance of it being worthless. Love it! |
|
|
|
Wow...900 difficulty.
Insane 15gh network speed....so little coins now |
|
|
|
There is not enough incentive to mine these coins, even though they have a massive security advantage over scrypt, and are ASIC resistant, the profitability is not there. The network effect strengthens coins, and if only a few good Samaritans will mine these coins at a loss (compared to mining scrypt), the coins and this algorithm will die. Good idea, no value.
You are thinking short term value profitability....The majority of us who mine x11 are long term.. Sure the returns aren't as high as other scrypt coins, but when the price does rise, the people who stuck through this low mining profitability phase will come out on top. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
