All I'm saying, remember when you were really in need of a $500 loan? Well, it's been almost a year and a half now, and you're still in the same position, asking for the exact same loan. A wise person would have figured out how to handle things on their own by now. Can you honestly say you're not capable of saving just $1 a day?

"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results."


Thanks, but I'm good.

In that case, instead of seeking a loan, why not take matters into your own hands and build up your savings?

Think about it. By stashing away a portion of monthly wage, you could easily save up that $500 in the year and a half that you've been begging for a loan here. We're talking about less than $30 a month here. Seriously, can you honestly tell me that setting aside such a small, insignificant amount each month is beyond your reach?

Please don't take offense if my comment came across as a bit harsh. Of course, everyone has the right to contribute to the thread. However, I think we can agree that we often have to sift through a plethora of low-quality posts to find valuable information, especially on the Gambling board. It's like searching for a needle in a haystack and it can be quite frustrating at times.  

I believe that in situations like this, most casinos have provisions to void bets, and these should be clearly defined in their terms and conditions. As for what happens if they have already paid out your winnings, I cannot say from personal experience since I've never been in that predicament. However, I assume that if the balance becomes negative, the corresponding amount will be deducted from the user's next deposit. It's not an ideal situation by any means, but it seems like you don't really have much choice if you want to continue using that platform. Creating a new account would likely violate the casino's terms of use, putting you at risk of having your account blocked and your funds confiscated.

First of all, there is no such thing. Statistics can be easily faked.
If you want to prove the efficiency of your prediction bot, I suggest that you publish your tips publicly so that anyone can easily verify them. No one's gonna buy into your story without some solid proof.

Read the OP's post again. Willowbitcoin made it clear that he was already Level 2 verified before Stake requested Level 3 verification.

Besides, as some have already pointed out, it doesn't make sense to undergo KYC verification on every site you use. Doing so only raises the risk of your personal data being leaked to the black market, which can lead to various additional problems down the line.

Are you asking that from the developer side of things? As far as I know, most casinos use some form of payment provider that handles the actual transaction process.

So why don't you go ahead and pawn or sell that iPhone you've got? Quit with the whole "asking for a loan" charade. It didn't work for you last year, it won't work now either.

No. The BIP39 mnemonic dictionary contains 2048 words. This means that there are about 3.6x10^16 possible combinations for your 12-word mnemonic seed, even if you know the right order of those 7 known words. It gets even crazier if you don't know the word order at all. Trying to brute force those 5 missing words? Forget about it! It's flat-out impossible.

The issue with Google Translate (or any other machine translator) is that it can generate complete gibberish translations, causing a complete loss of meaning. In my opinion, when you find yourself in a situation where you don't know the local language and need to communicate on a local forum board, it's best to stick with English. As a gesture of courtesy to the local members, it may be a good idea to provide both the original English version and the translated content.

Exactly! Ads are like those megaphones shouting, "Hey, check out this cool stuff!" They ain't twisting our arms or anything. We're the ones in control, deciding how we wanna react. Some folks are more swayed by persuasive tricks, and that's when ads work their magic. But let's face it, the impact of ads can totally depend on the situation and the people they're targeting. For example, when I see ads for some medicines or medical devices, they won't exactly make me whip out my wallet. But the same can't be said for older folks who have health issues; it's easier to convince them that these products might be helpful. It's the same with gambling ads, they work like a charm on people who are already inclined towards gambling or are easily swayed by the allure of fast money.

Your evidence in this case is weak. cytpoway121 posted that BSC address only once, after irsykes in the same bounty thread. It's probably just a dumb mistake after cytpoway121 used someone else's post as a template but forgot to change his own BSC address. He edited the post shortly afterward, though. Shit like this happens, and it doesn't necessarily mean they're using alt accounts, unless there is some additional supporting evidence.

So, last week you complained about someone calling you a kid (on a public discussion platform), now you're complaining about neutral feedback. What's next?



To be honest, I wouldn't even mind seeing a negative tag in this case. It would just make it easier for me to spot and deal with his posts. I know it wouldn't be right thing to do, but I have a strong gut feeling about this one, and it's making me quite uneasy.

As I mentioned before, even if you're not a DT member, you still have the ability (and should use it) to provide trust feedback, just like any other forum member. For now, your feedback will be displayed as "Untrusted feedback" on the user's profile. However, if you use your feedback the right manner, following norms and best practices, other members will take notice and may consider including you in their trust lists. This is how you can eventually earn the status of DT. On the other hand, if you choose not to provide any feedback, there's no reason for people to consider promoting you to DT, since no one can predict if you'll use your powers for the betterment of the community or not.


Yes, you can make use of the "Report to moderator" option. However, when providing an explanation, you should refer to the specific post or thread that contains the evidence supporting your claim. Another option, as mentioned by lovesmayfamilis, is to use a dedicated thread that you can find in the Meta section.


Absolutely! Mods usually need to have some really solid evidence before taking such action, and rightly so. It's not a decision that should be taken lightly.

Looks like you didn't bother to read through the whole thread and completely missed the latest response from the blackjack.fun casino representative. They clearly stated that the investigation was already done and OP's account was opened since yesterday. Next time, make sure to at least skim through the recent posts in the thread before sharing your opinions, so you can avoid making useless and unnecessary comments.

Nice to see you pop in and provide an update! And, it's good news to hear that the issue has been resolved. (Although it took you almost a month, which is still quite a long time to wait for a relatively small amount to withdraw from a casino.)


@alipro, could you please confirm this and maybe consider locking this thread if it's no longer needed?

It's no one's job but everyone's privilege to tag and raise flags as part of the forum's trust feedback system. You do have the tag power and by using it, you contribute to the community and become eligible for membership in DT. If you don't make use of this power, it's unlikely that others will consider including you in their trust lists.

When it comes to banning, only the mods and admins have the power to do that. As far as I know, they don't really care whether the reports are from DT members or just regular forum users.

I agree with your feedback, and have added you to my trust list. (Welcome to DT!) It seems that OP's intentions are probably malicious, and it's best to be cautious and not trust him. This should serve as a warning.

You mean, the one who discovered the account connection is Fullcoinese (OP)? A year and a half ago... 
However, it's worth noting that you were the one who brought up the fact that linked accounts could be considered ban evading as well.


What would you like to discuss more about this? The obvious connection has already been established. You can tag the accounts if you want, report them to the moderators for ban evading and move on.

So you haven't heard back from the Blackjack.fun rep yet, even though they told you they would have an answer for you by Wednesday? Usually, it's customary to give them an additional 24-48 hours. If you don't hear back from them by then, you can send a follow-up inquiry asking for an update on your case. You can also consider posting on their official forum thread and mentioning the forum representative, blackjack.fun. Although he was active a few days ago, he hasn't commented on anything related to your specific case.