Have you ever thought about Bitcoin becoming centralized someday? The ever-growing mainstream adoption of Bitcoin worldwide will only lead us closer to such scenario. To our surprise, El Salvador became the first country to adopt Bitcoin as legal tender. The more popular the cryptocurrency becomes, the more countries will be tempted to follow El Salvador's footsteps. Imagine governments making their own mining facilities, or even buying pre-established mining companies in order to gain a piece of the pie. If they manage to control more than 51% of Bitcoin's hashrate, the cryptocurrency will effectively become centralized. That, and the fact that they already control centralized exchanges is a very alarming situation for the future of Bitcoin.
Of course, the only way governments worldwide will be able to control 51% of Bitcoin's hashrate is if they unanimously agree on using Bitcoin is a "One World Currency". This may all sound crazy, but we cannot ignore it from happening in the future.
What are your thoughts? Will Bitcoin be able to remain decentralized for the foreseeable future? Or not? What do you think will happen if governments fully embrace Bitcoin as the replacement of Fiat? Your input will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
I don't think BTC can become centralized. For this to happen, someone must buy more than half of all issued BTC, and if we are talking about the mass adoption of BTC, it turns out that it becomes even more decentralized, as the number of BTC owners increases. In turn, complete centralization occurs when someone alone owns an asset or most of it and thereby influences the market and its development. At the moment, many holders have BTC and it is available for purchase without restrictions.