Yes, that's the correct repo.
Can you be a bit more specific what your problem is?

Scroll down to the bottom of any page here and click the simple machines forum link to find out more.

NVM, the guys behind Bitcoin Cash didn't notice themselves in the beginning and indeed started calling it BCC. Then they noticed the existing BitCoinConnect and meanwhile all exchanges I know of list BitcoinCash as BCH. 

After 17 days my withdrawal finally has been processed and received in my wallet. My respective support ticket took 16 days to get a reply.

I now consider myself a lucky one.

BCC is scrypt if the Bitconnect OP is correct:


Don't confuse BCC with BCH.

15 days now in "Awaiting Approval", no reply on my tickets.

I bet my ~$100 stuck there that by end of year latest they are gone.

Apologies, took me a bit longer to get everything sorted out with Iquidus and the initial sync and check took also a bit longer than anticipated:

https://tipsbe.netcraft.ch

I'll come up with a better logo in the next days, but for now it does the job.

I have added a referral link to Novaexchanges LTC/TIPS market at the bottom of the page as means for users to support the operation costs of the block explorer. If you click on this link you'll get to the LTC/TIPS market on Novaexchange. If you then create an account, I'll get 10% of your trading fees from Novaexchange.

On another note: If you hang out on freenode, join #fedoracoin and say hi. If enough people drop by, I'll take the tips-tipbot back online with an initial fund from me.

Cheers - psycodad

Just wanted to report that I finally upgraded my node (daemon-only) to the latest github master branch on Debian7-amd64 without any problems.
Its running now for two days and does well so far. However, no chance of staking even with only 500 coins (brings the machine to the speed of a pocket calculator). Slimcoin is in my experience the most demanding wallet (the PoS part) compared to any other I have ran and still run.

Another halving happened ~14hrs ago.

Any news on the wallet update?
Oh and block explorer http://g3n.midnightminer.net/ seems stuck again.

Yes, me and ahmed currently have commit access to the github.


I am working to get a block explorer going, it's currently synching up and should be ready within ~48hrs.

Have been using Poloniex literally for years and it was one of the fastest and most reliable exchanges over this time.
Then recently those rumours started here on bct that they do not answer tickets, block withdrawals and whatsoever. As I had only ~0.023 BTC left there from trading, I didn't worry much until last week when I decided to "evacuate" these few Satoshi - just in case..

Since then it looks like this:


In their KB it says:

Did that after 24hrs passed and got no reply yet.

I realize they got a lot of new users, Cryptsy told us that too before they went titsup*. I have no inside information that they are indeed preparing an exit or covering a fractional reserve business but I certainly will not deposit a single friggin satoshi anytime in my life to Poloniex. I call that what happens right now signs on the wall that you just can't overlook if you care for your coins.

Naturally I will update my post, if I ever see this withdrawal hit my wallet, but I have no big expectations for that anymore.


*Total inability to support user problems


[Update August 22nd:] I received my withdrawal and a reply on my support ticket on 21st August after 17days.

Thanks for the heads-up.
I was considering to use them as BTC-Fiat exchanger, but after reading about your experience with them I think I'll look further.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Load_(computing)

HTH

Last time I waited days for a 0.02BTC withdrawal was with Cryptsy. At least I could withdraw everything from Cryptsy before they went *poof*...
Poloniex "withdraw approval" smells very similar to Cryptsys "no-trade-fee-but-huge-withdraw-fee". Poloniex says it takes only 24hrs to approve it, but then they don't say when these 24hrs are 

Is this a mandatory update, if yes from which blockheight on?

Please note: I was only referring to the first link, I have no clue about the 502 links.

This might be a sign of the coin-control features in the client at work. People often create inputs in a certain size with that feature with the idea/goal of staking faster or more often or both  . The coin age (time your coin sits unspent in your wallet) multiplied by the number of coins in an input give your unspent input a staking weight which is one of the factors that decide if your input is eligible for a PoS of the next block coming.

I am actually not sure if this is looking like this on the blockchain if somebody is reorganizing their inputs for better staking, I hope somebody with better knowledge can confirm this.

Edited to add: The above is regarding the first link, I don't know about the latter.

Cheers - psycodad

You're welcome, hope it helps you see your first stake block finally.

You should either remove the two rpcuser/-pass lines or set the at least the password to something sensible. AFAIK for running the Qt-Wallet these are not needed, if you want to use the cli interface like in "slimcoind getinfo" in a shell, they need to be present (again, set a good password). I believe by default rpcallowip is restricted to 127.0.0.1 but I don't know for sure, might be a good idea to set it to 127.0.0.1/32 anyway.
The rpc interface is used to query and command the slimcoin daemon over the network from applications like for example a mining pool, exchange or a block explorer.


You shouldn't set the rpcport at all, which means it will use the default, if you do not have any conflicts on the default port it uses.

HTH - psycodad

That's certainly a good thinking that it's only a bloody account at the end.
However I was not suggesting that SHA1 is reversable/breakable now, but hinting you that there are huge rainbow tables out there that could already contain your SHA1 hash posted above (especially, if not salted).

Not quoting, coz if this checksum is not salted it might have been a very bad idea to post it.