|
nailed it, lol
edit: chiners say not yet, yeah no
|
|
|
|
securing profits. also 266+ for shorting is a no brainer.
He's not wrong, you know, just a little early. |
|
|
|
|
Refreshing to see the bitfinex order book look normal again.
|
|
|
|
$267.49 again. You gotta be fuckin kidding me. Bulls so scared of a 14 coin "wall"??
Filled, u happy now? |
|
|
|
The top is in on this run-up. Time to unload and take profits.  Well... |
|
|
|
|
Talk about being lifted higher with an atomic wedgie, hoo-o-boy $281.
Fake volume or not, these guys put on a show.
Surreptitiously eyeing seats as the music plays.
|
|
|
|
Shit. Fixed. But you gotta admit seven out of eight days and weeks is extremely rare occurrence. Even bitcoin doesn't go straight up forever. T'salright. A man is allowed to buy some booze with the proceeds of 50 coins he dumped on our heads in the 260's. |
|
|
|
|
The same govt that "misplaces" pallets of $100 bills in sandy locales goes all cloak and dagger to gain an extra $1mil or two in an auction... even bitcoiners can't suspend disbelief that hard.
|
|
|
|
Oh the hilarity of one poorly (or deftly) chosen letter. |
|
|
|
ps: meanwhile in altcoinland vitalik butterhurt herd be like..  well, butthurt.  Looks like the cutting edge ETH investors are bleeding wealth even faster than the poor XMR sufferers early adopters.  |
|
|
|
China up... the rest, again?  |
|
|
|
At least that upside-down Ripple shill is long gone. Remember that guy?  Extra points if you remember the "not upside down" one too. You mean Mah87 ? Walsoraj The oft forgotten and misunderstood Jaroslaw. |
|
|
|
At least that upside-down Ripple shill is long gone. Remember that guy? Extra points if you remember the "not upside down" one too. |
|
|
|
I'm sure closed source, pay Blockstream per month, federated chains, using multi sig secured collateral have a place in the ecosystem. I welcome them and applaud the effort in their creation.
However, there is a real concern regarding the motivations of veto wielding devs. Are they making decisions that would be best for Bitcoin, or decisions that might mold Bitcoin towards an environment that benefits Blockstream software products?
Their Bitcoin-related solutions surely would benefit from what is best for Bitcoin, wouldn't you think? Their Bitcoin-related solutions might benefit from what artificially handicaps (without killing) Bitcoin. No need to distill it any further. I know you are fully aware of, and have summarily dismissed this possibility, but others are less trusting. I have no issues with Blockstream itself, nor their work, but I tend to squirm when I see a glaring conflict of interest that not only can, but potentially has already directly affected the development of Bitcoin itself. |
|
|
|
However, there is a real concern regarding the motivations of veto wielding devs. Are they making decisions that would be best for Bitcoin, or decisions that might mold Bitcoin towards an environment that benefits Blockstream software products?
There must be no shortage of people waiting to spot one undeniable example of that bias. It'll be interesting to see whether they've got the balls to address it. I can think of 21 million reasons for them to not state that bias explicitly and publicly, we do have that whole actions/words cliché tho. |
|
|
|
|
I'm sure closed source, pay Blockstream per month, federated chains, using multi sig secured collateral have a place in the ecosystem. I welcome them and applaud the effort in their creation.
However, there is a real concern regarding the motivations of veto wielding devs. Are they making decisions that would be best for Bitcoin, or decisions that might mold Bitcoin towards an environment that benefits Blockstream software products?
|
|
|
|
There's not much going on with btc the forums gone to shit overrun with sig farmers and noobs plus there are many other places to get news and discuss things.
The old timers have moved on. Simple as that
IKR  |
|
|
|
Looks like they're not seeing the mystery candles for 10-80k coins happening in china with clockwork regularity, nor the repeating orders on bitstamp that barely move the price, nor the complete dearth of action in the intervening periods.
To use raw volume numbers reported by the unregulated exchanges as the sole basis for a trade sounds to be something other than "experienced".
Exhibit H:  |
|
|
|
Looks like they're not seeing the mystery candles for 10-80k coins happening in china with clockwork regularity, nor the repeating orders on bitstamp that barely move the price, nor the complete dearth of action in the intervening periods. To use raw volume numbers reported by the unregulated exchanges as the sole basis for a trade sounds to be something other than "experienced". |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
