Oh defend the ETH troll... good job jojo.... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) sorry, I don't keep an encyclopedic tally of every member's historical positions I just know that they been having a bit of a governance meltdown over there in Vitalic land and their currency has been tanking as a result. Just wondering if they are getting a handle on it is all. I thought the flippening was bcash. You'll find people expect more from legendary members. When you don't give it to them, they get saucy.
|
|
|
OMG, it appears we are about to make the death cross. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Should I really be concerned? About the value of all the coins you don't own because it's a hobby not an investment? Naw, it's cool I spent a lot of my time for my meager holdings. I want BTC to do well. I don't want the bears to dump on it anymore than I would want someone to take a dump on a valuable comic book that I was collecting. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FcIHfCXm.jpg&t=663&c=4i_bAMpwgmI0CQ)
|
|
|
I was in a taxi last night and caught the end of this song. It went like this: 'I'm in love with the shape of your body'. If you can imagine that
I always imagine you looking like Mayor McCheese, but with blind guy sunglasses on. This gives me pause.
|
|
|
OMG, it appears we are about to make the death cross. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Should I really be concerned? About the value of all the coins you don't own because it's a hobby not an investment? Naw, it's cool
|
|
|
I was in a taxi last night and caught the end of this song. It went like this: 'I'm in love with the shape of your body'. If you can imagine that
|
|
|
If they can't say 'orgy' how do they talk about all the group sex they have?
|
|
|
I see you have a list, too.
|
|
|
Another pearl from the Dev section: nLockTime is specific to the subject transaction. This means if you sign a transaction with an nLockTime, that transaction cannot confirm in a block prior to that constraint.
OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY on the other hand, restrict outputs of a transaction from being spent prior to a certain constraint. There are very different use cases for OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY than for nLockTime. If a customer is withdrawing funds from a service, there is no real reason why the service would want to restrict the customer from spending their withdrawal anything other than immediately.
As mentioned above, OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY will be used with LN and other similar payment channels. It is likely that OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY was soft-forked into Bitcoin with LN/payments channels in mind.
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FZGky8Pj.png&t=663&c=VIWrkX4AAvO7_g) did not know that tbh TIL thanks for the tip off
|
|
|
V8 please reduce your output of quality content. I have merited you excessively and it’s just not sustainable.
TBH, I'm a merit source, and down to my last 3 sendable sMerits, at the moment :| (No - DO NOT MERIT THIS POST YOU SILLY GOOSES !) ... and Theymos expects me to venture out of this thread ?! I'm trying to top off other posters from time to time when I notice they are running low as well. Too much quality here, folks. EDIT: Goddamn you, suchmoon... There are a few meritorious posts out there. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3174746.0But you really have to go looking for them. And who wants to do that? Edit: At the height of China's command over the Bitcoin market a couple or more years ago the number of full nodes there regularly fell below 100. I've just had a look and the number of full nodes has gone up hugely in the last few months to over 2000 now, in fact it's added over 1000 in the last month alone. https://bitnodes.earn.com/dashboard/?days=730Can anyone in the know tell me why this has happened?
|
|
|
Do y'all have a moment to talk about adamstgBit's vision?
More posts per page iirc. Yes, in order to scale we need to first up the number of posts to 160 per page rather than 20. Later on we need to remove the cap and have an unlimited number of posts per page. Or we could better trim the quotes, leaving only a link to the quoted post, so that we have more space in the same post to include several replies. Much more efficient than having to load a gigantic webpage for every single refresh that only users browsing from a datacenter could display. Should we also add a layer on top of it? That way people can keep making microposts of 1 character at a time. Oh yeah, maybe a chat box on the side, so that we can shitpost instantaneously without wasting precious thread space. There is no need to have shitpost like this stored on the main thread forever. If you're not willing to pay for the security and permanence of transacting on the main thread, there are layer 2 solutions.
|
|
|
Do y'all have a moment to talk about adamstgBit's vision?
More posts per page iirc.
|
|
|
This was not the first Wall Observer thread. No one talks about it. We all just whistle past that graveyard of rekt page bulls now. But I remember.
|
|
|
I think this 20K break is just psychological and is fake. It will fizzle out and then drop sharply back below 20k to begin a WO bear market.
I'm noticing a sort of bearish downtrend. I expect sideways for a couple of days and then resume of the trend. The support at 20K is very solid. Any retrace below and it will be posted immediately. Infofront could dump us down thousands of posts in minutes. I don't trust this page market.
|
|
|
I think this 20K break is just psychological and is fake. It will fizzle out and then drop sharply back below 20k to begin a WO bear market.
I'm noticing a sort of bearish downtrend.
|
|
|
I wonder if this will end up being the page?
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2F78.media.tumblr.com%2F0918f87c21c5cb4ae272669cd36b7c65%2Ftumblr_oh27lwyqUg1r0cew3o1_500.png&t=663&c=7goY6sb9N0tULA)
|
|
|
I've commented on page 20001 of Wall Observer. My life is complete.
I have tens of thousands of shitposts at my disposal. I could go off in a flash. I have nothing but free time
|
|
|
That Bob. Sure is quite a character.
|
|
|
|