OzoneChain kampanja je ponovno otvorena za nove sudionike. Napravljene su neke promjene u odnosu na prošle uvjete i plaćanja, a prethodni sudionici kampanje će imati dodatni prioritet.

Minimalno 10 a maksimalno 20 postova tjedno. Local postovi se NE broje u tjednu kvotu.

Payouts & Positions:

Just a quick question, did you even bother reading what the OP wrote? Seriously, how can you say that it's "very easy to achieve" when you clearly have no idea what he's talking about? And what two questions are you even talking about?

Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the OP is right or wrong in this particular case. We don't have all the information, and it would be best to hear both sides of the story, including the casino's perspective. But what really ticks me off is your lazy and generic response, as if you didn't even bother to read what the OP provided to Stake for his KYC verification. Show some damn consideration, will you? Don't just spew out useless posts to meet some weekly quota.

No doubt about it, this is definitely a case of ban evasion.

#1: yohananaomi

[archive]

Although yohananaomi was the first to use that ETH address, elisabetheva used it a whopping 56 times to take part in bounty campaigns afterwards.
https://ninjastic.space/address/0xFf0d1746B9036B925A4D40Cc3104a5Ce04413a6d

Adding to that, we also have the use of the same Tron address:

[archive]

[archive]

And also, the same BTC addresses: https://ninjastic.space/search?content=1CngCPexZ7w3NrRPW1LoYxvtT3qrEQMKfJ

Even though he tried to cover his tracks by removing some posts from the forum, the evidence preserved in the archives is simply overwhelming.

Hey, Rikafip, great work as always! And a big congrats on joining the prestigious 5k merit club. Well-deserved recognition for your contributions!



You are really cruel. You didn't even give him a chance to blow out the candles! Hahahaha!

I wouldn't go as far as to say he hates altcoins entirely. It's more like he's not a big fan of the useless shitcoins that make up 99.99% of the altcoin market. As for the remaining 0.01%, he remains indifferent. I suspect that most of us here share a similar sentiment. 

If by "dominate," you're referring to market capitalization, I think your argument might be a bit misleading. Firstly, as per the current data from CMC, Bitcoin's dominance is once again above 50%. Secondly, market capitalization doesn't really reflect the number of members in the crypto community. So I don't know how you came to the conclusion that 53% of the crypto community "was born from altcoins". Besides, it's not an either-or situation. Many people in the crypto world hold both Bitcoin and altcoins in their portfolios simultaneously.


That's true. But, when it comes to a forum platform like bitcointalk.org, this fact doesn't really have much relevance. Sure, you might see some buying and selling happening on the forum, but it's not the main thing people are here for.

All the suggestions provided by other members are pretty good. Based on my personal experience, I've noticed that newer platforms tend to offer slightly better terms to their affiliates. They're trying to attract new players and build their name in the community, so they tend to be more generous. However, be cautious and ensure that the casino you choose is reputable. You'll often find that the most appealing affiliate terms come from shady platforms that may not have your best interests at heart. Just make sure to check out the terms and conditions of each platform and review the specific details of their affiliate programs.

As for the welcome bonus for your referrals, I'm not sure if such a specific bonus exists. After all, how can the casino predict in advance that your referrals will be high rollers?

I'm simply pointing out what is outlined in their Sports Betting Policy:


While it may not seem fair, but you can't claim it's illegal, nor can it be considered a scam. Anyone who joins the platform and chooses to place bets must agree to their terms of use.

Regarding their explanation that the odds provider voided the bets, you can't really know if that's true or not. Different gambling platforms often work with different odds providers. So just because you placed the same bet on another platform doesn't necessarily mean their claim about the odds provider voiding the bets is false.

To be honest, this situation doesn't look good. Without diving into the specific case or what they suspect about your account, these KYC requirements seem ridiculous in 2023. I'm worried that if I were in a similar situation, I wouldn't be able to prove my place of residence either. All my utility bills are digital, and I handle all payments online. I don't have any physical copies of the bills (except when I print them myself), no tangible proof of payment, no signatures, or stamps... Basically, I'd be screwed if I had to provide that kind of proof.

I'm eager to see how Stake will respond to this as well.

No, there is no loophole. Even if you have a 99% probability of winning, there is still a 1% chance of losing. From the perspective of the casino, statistically speaking, one out of every 100 individuals will lose, allowing the casino to cover the expenses of paying the other 99 people.

But, most importantly, this is not how money laundering through casinos works. If you try this method, it's a piece of cake for the authorities to track the money and figure out where it came from. The whole point of money laundering is to hide the money's origin and make dirty money look clean and legit.

The trust system on the forum is unmoderated. There aren't any rules in place to stop a member from tagging a seller's or buyer's account.


I call this bullshit. I haven't come across a single instance where accounts are tagged by DT members as alts solely based on token transfers between them. There is always other (circumstantial) evidence that connects them.

Did either of you order some fish along with those miners?? Because I definitely smell something fishy going on here.

Nope, that's not considered ban evasion. If you happen to come across a proxy ban and don't feel like paying evil fees, you can try changing your public IP address or switching to a different VPN provider (if you're using one) and make a fresh account. Just remember, you won't be able to reuse the same username.

What specific information are you looking for? Mining without using any hardware, or without software? As hosseinimr93 said, mining Bitcoin without hardware is indeed impossible. Additionally, mining software is necessary to manage and monitor the mining process. So, both hardware and software are vital components for Bitcoin mining.

Naravno da neki od tih altcoin projekata mogu donijeti veće prinose u usporedbi s Bitcoinom. Ali, kao što je već rečeno, to također znači da je investitoru potrebno puno više vremena i truda za učenje, istraživanje i analizu. To nije za svakoga, a iskreno rečeno, samo mali postotak novih investitora je spremno za to. Evo jedan primjer iz stvarnog svijeta - nedavno je naša vlada izdala državne obveznice i ljudi su se doslovno utrkivali i stajali u redovima da ih kupe. Zašto ti ljudi nisu umjesto toga uložili svoj novac u dionice koje bi im mogle donijeti veći profit? Slično je i s kriptovalutama. Bitcoin je već etabliran i svi su čuli za njega, a što je najvažnije, nosi najmanji rizik. S druge strane, altcoin projekti su komplicirani, ima ih previše i nose mnogo više rizika. Ljudi jednostavno nemaju vremena ni živaca za to.

Yes, Bitcoin is an advanced technological breakthrough for the future of digital currency and financial systems, it has nothing to do with logging into online forums and websites. Seriously, why would you want to link your wallet to your online forum profile? It just opens up a can of worms, exposing you to all sorts of risks. You don't want your financial assets out in the open for everyone to see, right? Plus, there are always potential threats such as hacking or phishing attacks.

I'm afraid it doesn't work that way. There are many well-intentioned people here, but the thing is, people have no reason to trust you. Trust is something that must be earned, and you're not there yet.

Well, if you were an established member with a decent reputation and a track record here, I wouldn't mind to get in touch and engage in business with you. However, in your current situation, you come across as someone overly eager to get a loan, which is always a red flag. That's why good collateral is important when doing business with someone new to the community.

Probably because the name Shitcoin was already taken...  
 

Unfortunately, too many of them.

Yeah. It never fails to amuse me when I come across these feeble attempts. So, they claim to be bringing the best features of Bitcoin to Ethereum? And the only feature they mention is a limited supply of 21 million? I can't help but wonder, what happened to all the other Bitcoin's features?

You think? There have been literally dozens of manned expeditions to the wreck of the Titanic since it was found in 1985.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wreck_of_the_Titanic

The film director, James Cameron, who also happens to be a passionate explorer of the deep sea, holds the record for visiting the wreck of the Titanic over 30 times. There's even a rather amusing tale of a couple getting married in a submersible on the bow section of the Titanic wreck, recreating the iconic scene from the famous 1997 movie.

Username: FatFork
BTC address: bc1q4j5rytqzgqx9y9f03ny52y37sprlddqljv9hru

Thanks!

This is a common scam involving fake crypto exchanges. Scammers create websites and platforms that appear legitimate and mimic real exchanges to deceive unsuspecting users. These fake exchanges often offer attractive deals, such as exclusive promotions or deposit bonuses, to lure people in. Once users sign up and deposit their funds into these fake exchanges, they may experience difficulties withdrawing or accessing their money. The scammers might manipulate account balances, making it seem like users have more funds than they actually do. They may also delay or deny withdrawal requests, giving various excuses or claiming technical issues. In some cases, the scammers might even use phishing techniques, tricking users into depositing more money, under the guise of fake verifications, transfer fees, taxes, and similar charges. They will communicate with you and fabricate new reasons to justify further payments as long as you continue to comply with their demands. Don't do that!

The key point to understand here is that there are no actual Bitcoins in your account (they are merely fictional entries in their database), and there is no way to "trick" the website into paying you. Basically, you've been scammed. The best thing you can do is try to find the scammer who did it and report him to the authorities. And, whatever you do, never give scammers more money!