I am impress with the drive and eagerness by your team  to do something that spreads bitcoin awareness and adoption among the young people and you didn't actually stop there you have to offer them the opportunity to practically get on desk immediately by encouraging them with some Satoshi to have an experience of  what they have been lectured about exploring how it works.

Do you guys plan on continuing  the $1 worth of Satoshi to newcomers just after this set or it's just a part of the initiative that ends with this set learners. Because I was wondering how you guys source the money you gifting out as part of the programme?

Don't rest on gambling as source of financial income.

Not matter what people may say, gambling should be fun and that fun shouldn't be found only when we win but in losing too.

Never chasing losses can be helpful not to lose more. If you win in one or two games of the day just quit and go home to play another day.

Never gamble above your set gambling amount it better or makes you more In charge if you try to gamble below more often.

Never take loan to gamble, if you don't have the money to then just relax and feel comfortable while watching others play. Or better still just go home.

From what op explained I am not sure the problem of paying out the money is coming from the betting site/company but it's rather from a greedy bet shop owner who register as agent of the bet company as a channel through which in land gamblers can walk in and bet on their predictions. Some of these bet agents have given bad reputation to the bet sites they represent when the bat site has already paid in the won money into their ( the shop owner as agent) account immediately the bet win was confirmed so that can release the money to the appropriate winner but in their greed and scamming nature seeing how huge the money is they would choose to run away with the money. And this in turn cripples the repute of those bet sites they represent.

I have heard of these stories more often than one that's why I make sure to bet online if am using good amount to gamble with the expectation of winning a huge amount as returns just to avoid having my money at the mercy of betshop owners, except when am gambling for a small wins that doesn't make much sense to disappear with. Some of these bet shop owners are opportunists.

The question that reverberates in my head is this; it's crude oil the only natural resource that is embedded in Nigeria that the political leadership has beam their hornet nest all around it without thinking of diversifying the economy through other sectors making it an equal sources of earnings to the nation.

In the 50's down to the early 70's we had agricultural produce and agriculture was what the nation depends on and Nigeria economy was booming with the local currency having value over the so-called dollar of today. We had groundnuts pyramids in the North, cocoa in the West and palm oil and yam barns in the Southern part of Nigeria all of which were produced in large quality for exports to other countries.

Not until the late 70's that crude oil was discovered in Nigeria and the politicians  got engulfed and disarticulated by the oil boom and that was the beginning of this economy downturns we have been experiencing for decades and it getting worsening each passing year because the mistake is still in course.

The answer is simple: bad leaders happened to the Nigeria economy and these bad leaders are still happening as I writing this now.  Imagine a country that is suffering from a bad economy yet the executive and parliament are budgeting billions for exotic bullet proof cars for themselves each year.

The Nigeria situation is crystal clear that we have more and more of politicians in administration than leaders with leadership qualities and are driven by the love to actually serve and not been served as we see in all the levels of government of the country. Quack them borku e be like them be rice

if the word he was searching for has been searched for more often then that is the more reason the search process was supposed to be faster being a familiar words than any other words not being searched for a long time and not waste costly 10mins on doing that. Otherwise out of common sense  I'll agree with you that it might be due the quality of his device or network issue.

I supposed what you mean by seasoned trader is akin to consistent trader and for the fact that they are consistent traders doesn't make them win all trades because the market is unpredictable but it gives them an edge in winning more trades than they would lose. The unexpected downturns results from the market sentiments that is beyond the trader's control and it is his experience that helps him beat these sentiments to make profit for in trading without experience you can't win these inherent sentiments and luck is just a waste of hope if that what you wanna hang your penny on.
No one should deceive you mate, there's no stable returns in trading but like I said earlier experience enhances your chances of winning more trades more than you will lose if without trading experience.

No person will want to invest their money where their won't be profit especially not those that still believes in the centralized system, they do invest in shares, bonds, stock all of this is to earn profit so what difference does it make for the majority you think that are investing in bitcoin because of profit.

I feel a 99% of people that invests in bitcoin after doing their own research invested not just for the profit but following the privacy that bitcoin decentralization offers a situation you can at any time have access to your investment funds and make use of with your private keys without having to get consent from a third-party or passing through a paperwork  before gaining access.

Investment is motivated by profit be it in stock, bonds, gold or bitcoin and if all of these financial tools has no ROI a whole number of people will step back, so it's natural that the number investing in bitcoin will reduce should profit be removed from bitcoin.

1. Multisig wallet provides extra security for users that an intruder can not by any means gain access to funds by just having one key. To a degree it adds more security level since it can't be accessed by one one alone unlike single key wallets.

2. The idea behind multisig wallet is to protect co-partners from each other not to have access to funds without the knowledge of other partners, therefore if all multisig are made visible  to the knowledge of the three partners then the idea behind the multisig has been defeated even before you guys started it. Thus No, it shouldn't be visible to all.

3. It's possible two partners may die at same time particularly if they should happen to be in same car with a ghastly motor accident or anything in that manner, although it's rare both should die at same time but if that be the case it means the funds in the wallet is lost without.

Every wallet standard has its own affiliated risk it all depends on how we decide to manage these risks.

We don't get to hear about this kind of so often and that's why I am joining others to say a massive congratulations to you as a new married man. Gifting your newly wedded wife half of your total bitcoin investment is something surprising and lovely at same time because not many men will wanna think of doing that including me.

Op you making it seem as if bitcoin is mainly meant for male genders alone, bitcoin is just another form of money in digital form and money is not gender centric. Anyone can be interested and adopt bitcoin depending on how it was introduced to them.
I am not married yet, am still in the middle of it all and I don't think I have plans on gifting my wife bitcoin and I have my personal reasons for that. Hope it's cool I refer to your new home as a BTC home.

Crypto exchanges based in Australia would be made to possess a financial service license. A license that will be issued by the country's regulator of the financial services sector  the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, and by this it is only for those exchanges holding an exceeding amount of $3.2 million (A$5M) would be issued permit. The motive is said to protect consumers of exchange services which in other ways a groundwork to the growth of cryptocurrency.


Read
It's a right thing for government to do by initiating regulatory laws projected to protect her citizens from the possible wrongful manipulations of exchanges. Meanwhile, in recent scenarios draft legislations by government for the regulation of exchanges operating in the country have made a number of exchange's to exit countries they were once operational due to how unfavourable the regulatory laws made were said to be to the exchange's. Example of a fresh case we know of is that of binance leaving some of the countries they were once operating as a result of the regulations "might" have been grossly rigid for their business.

Therefore, is it possible that this proposed laws for 2024 by the Australian government would be something different from those of other countries that had to point some exchanges to the exit door?

Government is known for being too economical with the truth, as on the outer surface it's said to be all about protecting consumers but on the deeper perspective it might be regulations that's are weigh beyond just protecting consumers and maybe that's why some of these exchanges had to leave because the can't abide by the very regulations.

Quite an interesting way to teach a newbie about bitcoin and how it works. Dropping the video link with the story would have been more helpful for a newbie because my guts tells me that more important things beyond all that's is written in the op can be gotten in the video if a link was provided to it.

There's an impression I'll like to emphasize about how some bitcoin would wanna think about bitcoin when comparing it's useful case to fiat, and that impression is that bitcoin is fighting against fiat to take over the financial system of the world. It's not truly in that thought.

 Bitcoin is just an alternative to the fiat banking system for people who wants financial freedom from centralized censorships about their privacy and based on the anonymity and decentralization the bitcoin blockchain technology offers it makes it an alternate measure  and not that BTC is constantly having a fight with fiat system. No one is forced to adopt, it's a choice based on what money mean to you.

The apology is insignificant as it is believed to be a professional premeditated handiwork that was carefully done to trigger the crypto market as what could be the resultant effect on the ETF approval.

More like an early experimental design done to test how the market reaction could be like at the approval of bitcoin spot ETF and obviously the market price really did reacted in an upward way in less than 120 minutes before the news was debunked.

Let me hit the nail straight on the head about this issue.
1. The majority of the people have been made to believe that almost all the online forms of making money are scam and they are therefore not interested in anything concerning digital currency money making means.

2. With government restrictions and regulatory policies stoping banks for affiliating themselves with cryptocurrency it's very hard for people of that age to care about it in a society that's technologically backwards. At least some of these financial tech development  the bank would have been helpful in driving it's knowledge to their customers and the people trust the banks more as a financial institution hence whatever comes from them would be giving a an undoubted attention.

3. We don't have the right people in politics just a bunch of bigots who coercively found their way into power so what you expecting the dummies to do when they have not yet gotten satisfied with the looting and pillaging.

addicts have a cunning way of requesting money from people particular from those they are certain they have slim chances of being given the money. Like just look at the way he puts it "tomorrow I will pay more". They make this kind of appeal statements just to make the giver feel good and be moved to give them money to go on with their gambling.

Addiction should never be encouraged no matter how persisting a gambling addict drag you for loan. Who knows if that friend of yours already have other person's he has taken loan from through this way and have not yet paid and is  about to add you to his list of friends he is indebted to. Friend or no friend no one should be encouraged in his compulsive gambling habit because when they grow worse we might directly or indirectly affected somehow as close associates.

Those of use that are not yet privilege to that height would always question why the rich and wealthy spend money the way they do!

But the bitter truth is that we would spend more of what they are spending if we're to be in their position. They have the money entering on all sides from one endorsement to another and all they are burdened with is how and where to spend those money on.

For a gambler like Drake he has many good investments in place yielding steady returns for him so therefore spending $0.85million of his networth can be said to be nothing to him it's possible as we speak now that amount has been refilled by one of his many endorsement deals.

Yeah, there are reputable casinos that accepts cryptocurrency that are not found in the forum but for some of us we just don't know them as being reputable by first sight, so It is for the avoidance of taking the risk of the probability of  falling for the wrong casinos before getting to meet a reputable one which by then I would have lost valuable money. So to avoid the unthinkable I had to placidly stick to the ones I find here in the forum.



By just resting on the knowledge that  any challenge or issues you encounter while making use of any casino found in the forum that forum members would make sure to see it get resolved amicably, (be it deposit or withdrawal issues) it gives you confident to bank on your choice of casino to whatever amount you can afford to gamble with, that you won't be scammed of it especially to those casinos that have existed for a long time in the forum.

 
In same vein $1million is a big money to an average US citizen that's how 1million in any local currency would seem big to a citizen of that country to which that currency is designated irrespective of exchange rate difference in the international market.

 It doesn't have to be in dollars for it to worth his reasons for the avoidance.  Giving loans to family members or friends is a risk that any one would like to avoid because the ending part about getting back that loan in 10 out of 8 cases has never ended pleasantly for both parties.

For it's not difficult to get back a loan from strangers as you will be willing to apply every force necessary to getting it back without a feeling of sympathy for them but for family and friends sympathy and affinity usually gets in our way while trying to device forceful means to regain the loan from them.

you know say nah cos of those kind men them nah make Sars and efcc just the worry young boys wey try get legitimate update use am the make money thinking say nah thru some illegal means the young guy go don use make am.

Imagine how long some men don dey for this forum and if them dey able to save over the years com use that money run beta physical business wey the bring profits for them add with wetin them the collect from forum now, somebodi wey know know go com say nah Yahoo or illegal business him do cos him young compared to how much money him don get.

But it's good to have a legit source of making money so whenever you're being called to prove it you can boldly set the records straight without shaking like those with illegal online businesses wey the claim to be beta people bcos them Neva catch them too, but nah plenty days for the thief one day for the owner.

I enjoy creating my posts myself not mind it might not meet the standard of many people and it didn't bother me in as much as they receive the message understandably.  Based on where everyone is coming from our English standards cannot be same while you continuing doing it yourself you'll definitely blend and  improve your tense with time.

But depending on AI to create and arrange posts for you because you aren't a  native of English language is just absolutely bullshit because is someone else's work not and not yours that's why it's mainly regarded as plagiarism. Learning using AI isn't bad cause I also use it to learn about subjects I don't know about' however, using it to generate post and claiming author is not same as learning using AI.