I guess I'll give you points for being consistent: you're probably not simply 'anti Bitcoin', but against the larger development of excessive 'financialization' (through financial derivatives), right?
You bet. Money is not real wealth, it is just a token that one can exchange for real wealth things and stuff. Real wealth is something that most of the "intellectual powerhouses" here will never understand or have; they are too busy obsessing over accumulating stuff and things, measuring themselves against illusions and performing in a loaded game. +1 real wealth is knowledge. all other things are...well...things. |
|
|
|
you annoying bulls babbling about shorts and moon after a 1~2 $ rise...
50 k of old coins will hit open market soon, so you better pump this shit hard if you dont want to see 2 k batches of coins going for 150 $ or under!
You see the writing on the wall, you just like being cynical. Or you're just scared of seeming naive. Man up and take the plunge!  |
|
|
|
|
you annoying bulls babbling about shorts and moon after a 1~2 $ rise...
50 k of old coins will hit open market soon, so you better pump this shit hard if you dont want to see 2 k batches of coins going for 150 $ or under!
|
|
|
|
We are having an issue with picks.
I will try to clean it up. the three right below I am not sure.
tarmi has - 2.23 to - 1.98 this needs a correction perhaps -2.25 to -0.01?
make it - 2.25 to - 2.01 |
|
|
|
in a modern world full of ak47, m16 and other machinery the "biological equivalence of abilities of men and women" sounds to me like women are only missed in dick swinging contests.
try to marry some of those guys and you will find out the meaning of the word violence.
What a load of crap. How many top level women chess players are there? Poker players? How many Nobel prize-winning scientists? Top engineers? They exist, but the percentages are tiny. If humanity was all women who reproduced asexually, we'd all be living in very well-decorated mud huts. there is a reason for that> women suffered from male oppression for thousands of years. I was hoping you'd bring up this exact argument. There is a reason why men don't suffer from female oppression. because they were not able to handle expensive and heavy arms like swords? ak47 is easy to handle and very cheap. |
|
|
|
Ok, I'm gonna step into this whirlpool and note that the likes of silverfurtune and billyjoeallen have been real intellectual boons to this thread. The trolls have went into hibernation when the bosses have taken hold of the reigns. Primarily, Mr SF ad BJA have made their points and are moving on to their next ones, soon. I just want to say thx to the bosses in due time.
Thanks, Man. Please don't feel the need to defend me against charges of racism, sexism or whatever the crimethink de jour is. Whatever my moral flaws, the reason why I advocate Bicoin is because it is money that doesn't need force or coercion in order to function. Which would y'all rather have as a neighbor, a racist sexist homophobic who believes in the NonAggression Principle or an egalitarian who wants to make everyone equal by sticking guns in their faces? Freedom means you have to put up with some unpleasant people with unpleasant ideas, but you don't have to put up with threats of violence by those who claim to be peaceful while having the State do their dirty work for them. Ideally, I'd have the egalitarian non-aggression principle abiding guy for a neighbor, but your point stands. Confirming what Ramsay said: good to read your stuff in this sea of troll bile. Don't always agree with it, but it's rarely lazy thinking (the worst crime, intellectually speaking). another false dilemma. you cant really be sexist/homophob/racist and a nonagression believer at the same time because being sexist/homophob/racist implies aggression. Well then: if I present a false dilemma, you present a false conflation. In reality, most homophobes / sexists / racists *don't * follow non aggression. Far from it. But that's an empirical result, not a necessity. I claim I personally *do* know people that, by terminology of my peers would count as sexist, in the sense that they don't believe in biological equivalence of abilities of men and women. However, neither do they act like dicks about, or join bullshit movements like mrm. I'd argue that type of person is someone who you could reasonably call an non violent sexist. If you prefer to reserve the term for the violent kind however, fair enough as well. in a modern world full of ak47, m16 and other machinery the "biological equivalence of abilities of men and women" sounds like the women are only not able to join dick swinging contests. nothing more. try to marry some of those guys and you will find out the meaning of the word violence. Yeah, see this is where bja is precisely right: by your own standards, anyone holding an opinion that makes him unpalatable to you to marry has an unacceptable opinion (societally speaking). I prefer my society (and principles) to be slightly more permissive for variety of ideas than that. no, people like billyjoe should be institutionalized! |
|
|
|
Women's brains are different. They have less grey matter and more connective tissue. So do psychopaths.
you sure sound like one, bitcoiner! |
|
|
|
in a modern world full of ak47, m16 and other machinery the "biological equivalence of abilities of men and women" sounds to me like women are only missed in dick swinging contests.
try to marry some of those guys and you will find out the meaning of the word violence.
What a load of crap. How many top level women chess players are there? Poker players? How many Nobel prize-winning scientists? Top engineers? They exist, but the percentages are tiny. If humanity was all women who reproduced asexually, we'd all be living in very well-decorated mud huts. there is a reason for that> women suffered from male oppression for thousands of years. |
|
|
|
Ok, I'm gonna step into this whirlpool and note that the likes of silverfurtune and billyjoeallen have been real intellectual boons to this thread. The trolls have went into hibernation when the bosses have taken hold of the reigns. Primarily, Mr SF ad BJA have made their points and are moving on to their next ones, soon. I just want to say thx to the bosses in due time.
Thanks, Man. Please don't feel the need to defend me against charges of racism, sexism or whatever the crimethink de jour is. Whatever my moral flaws, the reason why I advocate Bicoin is because it is money that doesn't need force or coercion in order to function. Which would y'all rather have as a neighbor, a racist sexist homophobic who believes in the NonAggression Principle or an egalitarian who wants to make everyone equal by sticking guns in their faces? Freedom means you have to put up with some unpleasant people with unpleasant ideas, but you don't have to put up with threats of violence by those who claim to be peaceful while having the State do their dirty work for them. Ideally, I'd have the egalitarian non-aggression principle abiding guy for a neighbor, but your point stands. Confirming what Ramsay said: good to read your stuff in this sea of troll bile. Don't always agree with it, but it's rarely lazy thinking (the worst crime, intellectually speaking). another false dilemma. you cant really be sexist/homophob/racist and a nonagression believer at the same time because being sexist/homophob/racist implies aggression. Well then: if I present a false dilemma, you present a false conflation. In reality, most homophobes / sexists / racists *don't * follow non aggression. Far from it. But that's an empirical result, not a necessity. I claim I personally *do* know people that, by terminology of my peers would count as sexist, in the sense that they don't believe in biological equivalence of abilities of men and women. However, neither do they act like dicks about, or join bullshit movements like mrm. I'd argue that type of person is someone who you could reasonably call an non violent sexist. If you prefer to reserve the term for the violent kind however, fair enough as well. in a modern world full of ak47, m16 and other machinery the "biological equivalence of abilities of men and women" sounds to me like women are only missed in dick swinging contests. try to marry some of those guys and you will find out the meaning of the word violence. |
|
|
|
telling other people that their languages are some form of "tribal grunt" is a form of aggression in my book. that kind of verbal aggression usually precedes the actual act of physical aggression because that idea is based usually on a concept of a superiority of some sort.
just like the nazis claimed that they race is superior to others and used that construct as an argument to kill 5 mil of jews, you are claiming that you are leaving in an english dominated world and all non english talkers should suck your dick.
I think English is a superior language and so those who speak it are superior, all things else being equal. You have a right to disagree, but freedom means tolerating people who think differently than you do. on which basis you are making those claims? how many languages do you speak you faggot? Are you flirting with me? have a taste of freedom of yours! because my faith/beliefs superior to yours!  |
|
|
|
telling other people that their languages are some form of "tribal grunt" is a form of aggression in my book. that kind of verbal aggression usually precedes the actual act of physical aggression because that idea is based usually on a concept of a superiority of some sort.
just like the nazis claimed that they race is superior to others and used that construct as an argument to kill 5 mil of jews, you are claiming that you are leaving in an english dominated world and all non english talkers should suck your dick.
I think English is a superior language and so those who speak it are superior, all things else being equal. You have a right to disagree, but freedom means tolerating people who think differently than you do. on which basis you are making those claims? how many languages do you speak you faggot? |
|
|
|
you cant really be sexist/homophob/racist and a nonagression believer at the same time because being sexist/homophob/racist implies aggression.
How do you figure? Does not associating or wanting to associate with people do violence to them? Am I aggressed against if someone doesn't invite me to a party? Ask me to marry her? Hire me? Give me a loan? If so, then you seem to have a different understanding of "aggression" than me. I'm talking about initiating physical violence or threat of violence, and I'd like to hear someone make an argument defending doing that. However, if you agree that that type of aggression is bad, then anything else is changing the subject. well, telling other people that their languages are some form of "tribal grunt" is a form of aggression in my book. that kind of verbal aggression usually precedes the actual act of physical aggression because that idea is based usually on a concept of a superiority of some sort. just like the nazis claimed that their race is superior to others and used that construct as an argument to kill 5 mil of jews, you are claiming that you are living in an english dominated world and all non english talkers should suck your dick. |
|
|
|
Ok, I'm gonna step into this whirlpool and note that the likes of silverfurtune and billyjoeallen have been real intellectual boons to this thread. The trolls have went into hibernation when the bosses have taken hold of the reigns. Primarily, Mr SF ad BJA have made their points and are moving on to their next ones, soon. I just want to say thx to the bosses in due time.
Thanks, Man. Please don't feel the need to defend me against charges of racism, sexism or whatever the crimethink de jour is. Whatever my moral flaws, the reason why I advocate Bicoin is because it is money that doesn't need force or coercion in order to function. Which would y'all rather have as a neighbor, a racist sexist homophobic who believes in the NonAggression Principle or an egalitarian who wants to make everyone equal by sticking guns in their faces? Freedom means you have to put up with some unpleasant people with unpleasant ideas, but you don't have to put up with threats of violence by those who claim to be peaceful while having the State do their dirty work for them. Ideally, I'd have the egalitarian non-aggression principle abiding guy for a neighbor, but your point stands. Confirming what Ramsay said: good to read your stuff in this sea of troll bile. Don't always agree with it, but it's rarely lazy thinking (the worst crime, intellectually speaking). another false dilemma. you cant really be sexist/homophob/racist and a nonagression believer at the same time because being sexist/homophob/racist implies aggression. |
|
|
|
|
my guess>
- 2.23 % to - 1.98 %
|
|
|
|
...
the next big squeeze is on the shorts
...
I could be wrong though
...
 tarmi, are you bullish? no. I see some buliish signals, but I am not convinced yet. |
|
|
|
...
the next big squeeze is on the shorts
...
I could be wrong though
...
|
|
|
|
|
it is actually far more riskier to mine today with asics because you could always sell your gpus, but you cant do jack shit with asics once they go in red.
you cant really compete with asic producers. only if you have low electricity, like below 0.06 $.
|
|
|
|
Wait a minute tarmi, you were the one getting angry last weekend when the price inexplicably rose!
I wasnt angry really, I was selling like mofo. I was anxious because some dude was talking stupid racist, sexist shit. but that is business as usual in this thread. I mean the stupidity. |
|
|
|
Tarmi you do not mine multiple bitcoins daily..
But keep up the bs.
I remember the days when some cheap gpu-s like 5850 mined almost 1 btc a day. you probably bought those coins from me and now feel angry. I think I bought them at 5. I'm happy  still hodling them on the way down from 1000 $?  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
