the smartest way to do that in my opinion is automatic intesting.
I don't have the guts for that. |
|
|
|
Those 0.002 bitcoins cannot be redeemed, because there is no input that will make that script valid (because there are no OP_ENDIF opcodes in there to match the OP_IFDUP/OP_IF opcodes).
OP_IFDUP doesn't need a matching OP_ENDIF opcode, but OP_IF does. The end of EvalScript() checks that all OP_IF and OP_NOTIF operations have been closed by an OP_ENDIF, else returns false. |
|
|
|
I should make a bot watching&grabbing these free coins.  1) They're not grabbable 2) In total they're only worth 0.38174231 BTC |
|
|
|
9000 +
50
____
9050 BTC
There, fixed it.  Actually he 'only' lost 8,999 BTC.
38512.76334734
- 1.00000000
38511.76334734Edit: disregard this. maged already made the adjustment I wasn't quick enough spotting my mistake, so I need to undo it here: 38516.15284232 + 1.0 38517.15284232 |
|
|
|
I'd say that's legitimate as lost coins. Not sure how you'd go about finding similar lost coins though. 38510.26110001 + 0.0022473338510.26334734 There are 131 of these 'script' transactions so far, and they're still happening. Here's a list: ============address============== ===date==== ==amount== ==total===
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166533 Feb 12 2012 0.00070359 0.00070359
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166569 Feb 13 2012 0.00360503 0.00430862
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166577 Feb 13 2012 0.00192493 0.00623355
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166607 Feb 13 2012 0.00128911 0.00752266
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166612 Feb 13 2012 0.00244426 0.00996692
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166615 Feb 13 2012 0.00053919 0.01050611
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166628 Feb 13 2012 0.00292673 0.01343284
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166653 Feb 13 2012 0.00023878 0.01367162
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166705 Feb 14 2012 0.00378656 0.01745818
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166726 Feb 14 2012 0.00541471 0.02287289
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166732 Feb 14 2012 0.00543571 0.02830860
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166779 Feb 14 2012 0.00565863 0.03396723
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166794 Feb 14 2012 0.00041597 0.03438320
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166830 Feb 14 2012 0.00514466 0.03952786
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166918 Feb 15 2012 0.00019389 0.03972175
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166922 Feb 15 2012 0.00075685 0.04047860
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166984 Feb 16 2012 0.00281299 0.04329159
http://blockexplorer.com/b/166985 Feb 16 2012 0.00407387 0.04736546
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167161 Feb 17 2012 0.00410972 0.05147518
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167198 Feb 17 2012 0.00415832 0.05563350
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167248 Feb 17 2012 0.00145139 0.05708489
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167271 Feb 18 2012 0.00225675 0.05934164
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167276 Feb 18 2012 0.00207869 0.06142033
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167346 Feb 18 2012 0.00257912 0.06399945
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167363 Feb 18 2012 0.00309957 0.06709902
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167440 Feb 19 2012 0.00007664 0.06717566
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167462 Feb 19 2012 0.00322002 0.07039568
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167481 Feb 19 2012 0.00128328 0.07167896
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167485 Feb 19 2012 0.00045587 0.07213483
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167525 Feb 19 2012 0.00549808 0.07763291
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167555 Feb 19 2012 0.00059496 0.07822787
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167585 Feb 20 2012 0.00399989 0.08222776
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167658 Feb 20 2012 0.00275106 0.08497882
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167667 Feb 20 2012 0.00118138 0.08616020
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167668 Feb 20 2012 0.00000906 0.08616926
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167722 Feb 20 2012 0.00470455 0.09087381
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167825 Feb 21 2012 0.00087694 0.09175075
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167850 Feb 21 2012 0.00427282 0.09602357
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167855 Feb 22 2012 0.00208888 0.09811245
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167883 Feb 22 2012 0.00415304 0.10226549
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167905 Feb 22 2012 0.00005565 0.10232114
http://blockexplorer.com/b/167977 Feb 22 2012 0.00594791 0.10826905
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168021 Feb 23 2012 0.00082734 0.10909639
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168031 Feb 23 2012 0.00431250 0.11340889
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168037 Feb 23 2012 0.00800210 0.12141099
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168070 Feb 23 2012 0.00250262 0.12391361
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168077 Feb 23 2012 0.00472285 0.12863646
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168185 Feb 24 2012 0.00286246 0.13149892
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168197 Feb 24 2012 0.00226009 0.13375901
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168265 Feb 24 2012 0.00057839 0.13433740
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168269 Feb 24 2012 0.00145200 0.13578940
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168279 Feb 24 2012 0.00583032 0.14161972
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168340 Feb 25 2012 0.00077170 0.14239142
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168375 Feb 25 2012 0.00255920 0.14495062
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168430 Feb 25 2012 0.00375652 0.14870714
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168508 Feb 26 2012 0.00051736 0.14922450
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168553 Feb 26 2012 0.00796309 0.15718759
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168710 Feb 27 2012 0.00057744 0.15776503
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168736 Feb 27 2012 0.00242172 0.16018675
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168770 Feb 27 2012 0.00399886 0.16418561
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168792 Feb 27 2012 0.00352397 0.16770958
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168829 Feb 28 2012 0.00532818 0.17303776
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168978 Feb 29 2012 0.00316282 0.17620058
http://blockexplorer.com/b/168984 Feb 29 2012 0.00138952 0.17759010
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169103 Feb 29 2012 0.00755494 0.18514504
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169128 Feb 29 2012 0.00516194 0.19030698
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169146 Mar 01 2012 0.00056122 0.19086820
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169208 Mar 01 2012 0.00050910 0.19137730
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169287 Mar 02 2012 0.00339499 0.19477229
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169319 Mar 02 2012 0.00620574 0.20097803
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169343 Mar 02 2012 0.00468414 0.20566217
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169367 Mar 02 2012 0.00116705 0.20682922
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169398 Mar 02 2012 0.00224733 0.20907655
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169482 Mar 03 2012 0.00464537 0.21372192
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169516 Mar 03 2012 0.00187881 0.21560073
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169573 Mar 04 2012 0.00457810 0.22017883
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169585 Mar 04 2012 0.00629569 0.22647452
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169731 Mar 05 2012 0.00253851 0.22901303
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169766 Mar 05 2012 0.00158564 0.23059867
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169789 Mar 05 2012 0.00441625 0.23501492
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169802 Mar 05 2012 0.00288406 0.23789898
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169821 Mar 06 2012 0.00100676 0.23890574
http://blockexplorer.com/b/169913 Mar 06 2012 0.00406460 0.24297034
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170029 Mar 07 2012 0.00018553 0.24315587
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170046 Mar 07 2012 0.00433286 0.24748873
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170087 Mar 07 2012 0.00291929 0.25040802
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170159 Mar 08 2012 0.00057222 0.25098024
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170186 Mar 08 2012 0.00032761 0.25130785
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170260 Mar 08 2012 0.00575009 0.25705794
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170354 Mar 09 2012 0.00264517 0.25970311
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170362 Mar 09 2012 0.00778668 0.26748979
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170415 Mar 09 2012 0.00150029 0.26899008
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170422 Mar 09 2012 0.00218183 0.27117191
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170436 Mar 10 2012 0.00590602 0.27707793
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170459 Mar 10 2012 0.00167513 0.27875306
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170617 Mar 11 2012 0.00347816 0.28223122
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170633 Mar 11 2012 0.00417667 0.28640789
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170728 Mar 11 2012 0.00422097 0.29062886
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170732 Mar 12 2012 0.00638133 0.29701019
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170740 Mar 12 2012 0.00358863 0.30059882
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170771 Mar 12 2012 0.00582657 0.30642539
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170775 Mar 12 2012 0.00388815 0.31031354
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170791 Mar 12 2012 0.00042056 0.31073410
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170976 Mar 13 2012 0.00025778 0.31099188
http://blockexplorer.com/b/170998 Mar 13 2012 0.00059668 0.31158856
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171003 Mar 13 2012 0.00392645 0.31551501
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171042 Mar 13 2012 0.00522476 0.32073977
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171098 Mar 14 2012 0.00184036 0.32258013
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171107 Mar 14 2012 0.00449177 0.32707190
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171147 Mar 14 2012 0.00492298 0.33199488
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171208 Mar 15 2012 0.00192560 0.33392048
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171265 Mar 15 2012 0.00005350 0.33397398
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171304 Mar 15 2012 0.00204740 0.33602138
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171308 Mar 15 2012 0.00570292 0.34172430
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171333 Mar 16 2012 0.00113558 0.34285988
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171373 Mar 16 2012 0.00006181 0.34292169
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171388 Mar 16 2012 0.00067667 0.34359836
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171456 Mar 16 2012 0.00015301 0.34375137
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171459 Mar 16 2012 0.00565542 0.34940679
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171518 Mar 17 2012 0.00125161 0.35065840
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171535 Mar 17 2012 0.00201801 0.35267641
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171544 Mar 17 2012 0.00111346 0.35378987
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171562 Mar 17 2012 0.00402783 0.35781770
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171613 Mar 17 2012 0.00480879 0.36262649
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171641 Mar 18 2012 0.00434410 0.36697059
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171737 Mar 18 2012 0.00451762 0.37148821
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171764 Mar 18 2012 0.00201367 0.37350188
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171830 Mar 19 2012 0.00506286 0.37856474
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171845 Mar 19 2012 0.00039682 0.37896156
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171852 Mar 19 2012 0.00081491 0.37977647
http://blockexplorer.com/b/171883 Mar 19 2012 0.00196584 0.38174231
So that's 0.38174231 lost in total, and you already counted 0.00224733, leaving 0.37949498 more to add: 38511.76334734 + 0.37949498 38512.14284232 |
|
|
|
9000 +
50
____
9050 BTC
There, fixed it. Actually he 'only' lost 8,999 BTC.
38512.76334734
- 1.00000000
38511.76334734Edit: disregard this. maged already made the adjustment |
|
|
|
FYI, Windows binaries from the 0.6.0rc4 source (in git) will not get you a fixed build.
Why's that? The v0.6.0rc4 tag includes the -lmingwthrd fix. When I first saw your post I figured I must have guessed wrongly what the update was all about, because the changes for safe multi-threading in mingw were included in the rc4 source. |
|
|
|
|
The prices you see in the orderbook already have the 2.5% added on (or subtracted off, depending on the order type).
So the only time you pay the extra 2.5% is when the best real Euro offer is 2.5% worse than the best offer in a different currency.
In other words, if they had separate pools for each currency, you would never get a better deal than you are currently getting, and would usually get a worse deal.
I remember looking at the EUR market on Gox when they first introduced the new currencies, and noticing that there was a 5% spread between best buy and best sell prices, whereas the USD market had the same volumes but with an almost 0% spread.
|
|
|
|
Why does it say that it is a bad idea?
If you send 10 BTC to a new address that I generate, then I send 1 BTC back to you, block explorer will show a balance of 0 BTC on my address, not 9 BTC like you might expect. The other 9 BTC will have been sent as 'change' to a new address in my wallet. |
|
|
|
|
Is there a branch that merges cleanly to the official git master branch? I get merge conflicts when I try.
|
|
|
|
At only 0.015btc for a 10x10 block and you can get up to 9000 pixels (1.5BTC).
So: one 10x10 block is 0.015btc and 90 10x10 blocks is 0.015btc times 100? Usually there's a discount for buying in bulk, not a penalty. |
|
|
|
Ever seen someone flop a royal flush?  |
|
|
|
I would consider the quantity of coins in circulation be the sum of the balances in all addresses that have been either on the sending or receiving end of a transaction in the last 365 days.
Or maybe better the total of all transaction outputs from the last 365 days which aren't yet redeemed. I could have a million BTC in an address that hasn't been touched for 2 years, and then add 10 BTC to it today. That shouldn't add a million and ten to the "in circulation" number; it should just add 10 BTC. |
|
|
|
I haven't though received the alleged email with all 5,000 Intersango client emails as recipients shown so doubt this advise is genuine???
I received it. It has 5586 email addresses and only 511 of them match those on the leaked MtGox database. There is a list of hashes of the leaked emails, along with a shell script that can be used to check whether your email address was on the list, here: https://sites.google.com/site/intersangoemails/ |
|
|
|
In today's announcement there is no timeline for the return of clients' funds.
I have been holding the WBX Bitcoins in an offsite account, for safekeeping. They're all accounted for, and are available to withdraw right now for users with BTC balances. I transfer them back to the WBX wallet as and when they're needed. The server emails me when it's short of Bitcoins, so if there's ever a delay with your BTC withdrawal, it's because the server wallet was emptied and is waiting for me to transfer more in from the offsite wallet. This is something I was doing for Andre rather than leaving them on the WBX server, in an attempt to prevent a Linode style theft. |
|
|
|
if you're looking for the 'scammer', try ANZ.
ANZ will not reveal any data of it's clients nor confirm that accounts have been frozen due to fraud investigations without the consent of the owner of the account. I tried that, already  Probably they would be more willing to share information with the local law enforcement agencies. I think the point payb.tc was making was that ANZ is the scammer, not Andre. The last I heard from Andre was on March 6th, when he wrote: "i will be announcing a statement with in the next 7days on the site and forums". |
|
|
|
Yes, I didn't actually try your version. Your post just reminded me that there was a thread about this and prompted me to report the bug. |
|
|
|
|
I don't know if this is a bug, or if I'm doing something wrong, but if I go to the wallet details tab and paste in these 64 characters as a hex private key:
> 0000111122223333444455556666777788889999AAAABBBBCCCCDDDDEEEEFFFF
then it tells me the "Private Key Base64 (44 characters):" is
> EREiIjMzRERVVWZmd3eIiJmZqqq7u8zM3d3u7v//
which is only 40 characters, not 44.
If I then try entering those 40 characters as the private key, it tells me:
> The text you entered is not a valid Private Key!
I guess because my made up 64 character hex private key started with a few zeroes. Would this ever happen with a randomly generated key pair?
|
|
|
|
|
The new "Answer a few questions about a website (Candada - DAYOFWEEK task #6)" task isn't working for me.
I clicked it, clicked the link to bring up a google page, searched in google, found the link on the 3rd page of results, clicked it, found the 3rd featured game, and filled in the form. Then I was told:
"Could not save your work
You must click through to the specified web page."
I tried it twice, and got the same result both times.
I wonder if my ad blocker is interfering.
Edit: I tried it without the ad blocker and get the same result.
Also, they ask "would you use this site?" but not "why not?". I wouldn't use it, because they don't accept bitcoin, and would like the option to tell them that that's the reason.
Edit: I tried in Firefox as well as in Chromium and got the same error
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
