I think that you will agree that knowledge of English and finance/ marketing/management, ummm, is not related.
English is related to any kind of knowledge. How is he going to evaluate cryptocurrency projects without reading about them? Without English you cannot read white papers properly Without English he cannot read even about Bitcoin . Is he going to evaluate projects using Google translator? Or whitepapers poorly translated from bots/spammers? Ok, it is possible that this guy is a financial genius and will make people rich, without proper English. But it's not probable
|
|
|
My biggest question this is. Really we can't? Even if this is not possible in today's technology, what will be the future? I think there should be some progress on this issue.
That´s not how it works. You know the public address, not the public key. It´s a matter of processing power. It is not possible mathematically to break a privatekey without a public key.
|
|
|
You are confused...
Investing in cryptocurrency is no crime, laundering money is.
Making money illegally and trying to hide that money using crypto is one thing. But earning money legally and investing in BTC has nothing to do with that.
If you can prove that you earned your money legally and bought btc, you have nothing to hide or be affraid.
|
|
|
IMO, there is no way to achieve a "fair distribution of energy", simple because the world resources are not fairly distributed.
In Brazil we have lots of potential for hydroelectricity, and in Saara desert there isn´t such potential.
Not everything has to be fairly distributed. People need to use world resources according to their possibilities, not according to their needs or desires.
|
|
|
They dont seem to have many followers on their site, 360 in total, but still they would be getting some cheap marketing and exposure and in return only one user gets awarded with $50 worth of Bitcoins.
Which is quite convenient, to reward a random user. Not auditable, so nobody knows of they are just rewarding their own... That's why it's important to hire professional managers. OP take a look at services board, some good managers are looking for work there.
|
|
|
There is one important thing you forgot to mention. What matters for fees is not how many addresses you have, but how many inputs you have. Let´s suppose you engaged in many sig campaigns and you received 0,0005 every week for 20 weeks. You earned 0,01BTC, however you will have more than 20 inputs on the same address. Every transaction made from your address will now have cost based on every input, individually, when you want to move them. That´s why it´s important to consolidate your small inputs when fees are low. If you consolidate your 20 0,0005 BTC with 2 sat/byte, it will be much cheaper than making a transaction now for 20 inputs with 60 sat/byte. Take a look at LoyceV guide about it: Fees are low, use this opportunity to Consolidate your small inputs!
|
|
|
What is the main use if Candidate block? Every miner will produce their own candidate block, and then attempt to mine it by calculating the block hash. The miner who is successful first will broadcast their candidate block to the blockchain. This block hash calculation is the Proof of Work. Statistically, according to the hashing power (hash rate) of the network, miners will find the Nonce to solve the Proof of Work algorithm in 10 minutes. It´s a brute force attempt, where miners will try millions of hashs per minute. When a miner solves the PoW algorithm a new block is created and he is awarded with 12,5 BTC. For this reward, miners start looking for this hash immediately after the previous block is done (even if the mempool is empty), so they do not lose time. The candidate block is a block with the mempool transactions of a miner. I made a small summary on proof of work here, for more details. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3317586.0
|
|
|
Sempre fui fã do bitvalor. Obrigado por divulgar.
Infelizmente recentemente foxbit e a negociecoins saíram do índice deles, por motivos óbvios (manipuladores de volume que vergonha !!)
Teve isso da FoxBit estar manipulando volume? Na negociecoins eu vi que o volume estava meio surreal, mas na Fox toda vez que eu entrava estava até bem abaixo do que nas outras como Mercado e BitcoinTrade. Talvez tenha me enganado quanto a foxbit ter manipulado volume... A negociecoins já virou piada, era a Exchange com maior volume Ko mundo kkkk A foxbit por algum motivo não fornece os dados pra bitvalor. Com certeza não é por uma boa causa O bitValor monitora um conjunto de exchanges nacionais que seguem critérios específicos, dentre eles, o fornecimento de todos os trades históricos via API, a publicação do livro de ofertas, a qualidade dos dados dos trades através de análise de anomalias estatísticas, entre outros. Desta maneira, nem todas as exchanges nacionais se encontram nesta análise por diferentes motivos, e o nosso desejo é que todas elas possam um dia ser listadas, melhorando a transparência deste mercado.
|
|
|
Raise money, not rase.
Lol The current situation of the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Illiterate people offering services to identify opportunities to make money
|
|
|
However, it seems that you forgot at least one thing: electricity cost. Who knows how high electricity cost will be in the future? This factor will considerably affect on bitcoin transaction fees and rewards to miners. In real-life, inflation might change, so no one knows. Of course, once again, I agree that it won't much higher than current fess. Maybe somewhere around $5 to $10.
Electricity cost is much more related to the location (legislation, government incentives, natural resources, etc) and they will have a bigger effect in Bitcoin prices, not in transaction costs , in my point of view It costs something like 3k USD to mine one Bitcoin in China (it's close to that value, based on electricity costs). If this price raises to about 10-20k, it will have an impact on bitcoin prices . But theoretically it will not have that same impact on fees. Halving will work like that. Even if electricity costs don't change, when halving occurs it will double the Bitcoin mining costs, but will not necessarily double transaction fees.
|
|
|
Sempre fui fã do bitvalor. Obrigado por divulgar.
Infelizmente recentemente foxbit e a negociecoins saíram do índice deles, por motivos óbvios (manipuladores de volume que vergonha !!) Assim o índice deles ficou meio fora da realidade em termos de volume, pois foxbit e negociecoins tem realmente mais volume do que essas outras todas...
Espero q essas duas empresas tomem vergonha e voltem a trabalhar com honestidade sem manipulação de dados de volume e etc.. o mercado brasileiro só tem a ganhar.
|
|
|
I think this should be in reputation. Actually, I think this should be a pm lol
|
|
|
And they already have their token, tether.
This token crazy is bad for bitcoin in my opinion.... Why would they need 1 billion to launch a token? Unless it's something like tether, which need to be backed up, that's far too much money, more than necessary
|
|
|
I wouldn't worry about fees in long term. Imo they will stay lower than $1 and most of times lower than 0.3, with very few exceptions during price peaks.
Even if BTC price goes 10-100x, fees will stay lower than $1, because that's enough to reward miners.
|
|
|
Hello
I am looking for a united States based exchange for non residents, where I can make ACH - Automated Clearing House. I have a bank account in he us but I don't have an address there. Coinbase requires to be resident to use ACH. Can someone suggest me some other exchange there?
|
|
|
I think you need a service such as https://bitpay.com/I am not experienced with his kind of service, but bitpay is a very old one, I don't think you will have problems.
|
|
|
As far as I know, it's not possible to have a negative balance in your Bitcoin address. If you search in a more reliable block explorer the balance is zero.
This idea of negative balance is a nonsense in blockchain, because you can just create a new address.
Banks can give you a negative balance, but blockchain can't.
|
|
|
Alias, até mesmo a troca de seguidores eu consideraria meio antiética. Na maioria das vezes o anúncio não é nem um pouco efetivo, já que os seguidores não acompanham/interagem com os tweets daqueles que eles seguem (afinal, seguir X pessoas é só uma consequência para ser seguido de volta).
Pois é, mas pensando dessa forma ate bounties Sao anti éticas. Estão comprando likes e retweets. Acredito que a maioria dessas empresas ou gerentes envolvidos não se importam tanto com a qualidade dos usuários que dão like etc mas tb não querem dar na cara que são bots... É um mercado muito louco e q eu desconhecia antes de conhecer o butcointalk
|
|
|
Eu "desgosto" de ambas ideias. Participar de bounties (pelo fato de 99% ser shitcoin/scam) e comprar seguidores, afinal, você está sendo "pago" para divulgar algo para supostos usuários reais. Se é tudo falso, então você está fraudando a campanha/bounty.
Na real esse método não é fraudulento, teoricamente. São usuários como ele que querem conseguir o máximo de seguidores para esses fins.. se um usuário tem 500 contas fazendo isso é outra história.
|
|
|
Today you are newbie, but somedays you will be legendary and you have to lead next generation. Don't let your brain for sleep.
Lol this is just a forum and legendary is just a rank. It means nothing, and will not lead generations There are many people around the world which knows a lot of Bitcoin and computers and don't have a legendary account here.
|
|
|
|