It's a good time to buy onions  Enjoy Price close to $3, 85% below the ATH, definitely a good price to buy  Low price is always a great opportunity to buy. And then let all the people who sold at this price regret it |
|
|
|
Friendly reminder: If you haven't completed the posts necessary for this week's airdrop (3 on the DeepOnion forum and one here) do it now. Let's not have any members disqualified for that reason. It's very easy to do this requirement  |
|
|
|
I bought into DeepOnion when it was 50 ish cents. I thought to myself, It'd be cool if DeepOnion gets to a dollar or so by the end of the year. Then it went to 2-3 dollars. And I thought, it'd be cool if DeepOnion got to 5 dollars by the end of the year. Then it went up to 10 dollars..then 20.
The reality is, expect the unexpected. I believe in DeepOnion, but really thought it would hit 20 bucks much later. If the market has a run like it has in the past DeepOnion will easily hit new ATHs.
With new tech coming shortly and the BitIndia listing (which is a monster of an untapped market) we could see some life changing prices sooner than later.
haha, i know that story. same for me i bought at 70 cents I`m sure we will see 1xx this year.  100 is not even a joke. It's fair value for this coin with all the dev going on. Look at other privacy coins, they aren't developing anything.. just stealing the ICO and running away. 50 cents?? 70 cents?? 1 dollar! wow haha my first purchase was when it was at $5.33 on December 28th. haha darn. Wish I knew about this project sooner. But hey, not complaining. It's like saying I wish I knew about FB and Google and Yahoo when their stocks were selling for 10 bucks, or whatever low number they were at, with their IPOs. haha. You're still lucky. Others have bought Onions at ATM which was at $18 - $19 Or think about the people who will buy when they see DeepOnion's price is at $50 lol |
|
|
|
I look at low positions for the price, I take and buy onions from weak hands. All the light, weak hands can not understand what the actual price of onion is higher, and now you just need to wait. I am betting on steady growth in Q3 2018.
It's true  I just added another 600+ Onions to my wallet. I'm expecting a $10 Onion in Q3-Q4 easily. It was already near 20$ - Why would it only get to 10$? I expect 40+$ once the market rises above 800Billion again and Onion get's listed on new exchanges! I'm not an expert and I must ask you all: - Price was 18$, and why we need to wait q3-q4 for 10$ for Onion? I think that this $18 price was partially inflated by Bitcoin's rise to 20k. I believe in DeepOnion but it was very premature to reach $18 at that time. The whole market got excited and you could see most coins were inflated. The fact that DeepOnion is now stable at $4-$5 is very important for the coin's growth. And of course, we'll see it reach much higher after the airdrops end. |
|
|
|
Hi.
May i know what changed ? what are those new rules on Bitcointalk.
i just hope it's not the ranks !!!
Keep in mind that the old activity points system is still in effect, but you can't rank up above Junior Member without getting merit points anymore. |
|
|
|
little question to the caring community: I start but I try to be active in the forum and I'm happy because on my messages I have activity points but since yesterday nothing anymore .. my number of points is I was stuck at 28 and I managed to get to 30 to get JR status.   I arrive late for the airdrop but I am so happy to have known this project and its community You need to wait until the next activity cycle comes. I believe the next one starts on 27th of February. Then you'll be able to make it to junior member. |
|
|
|
Whoa just staked 5 ONIONS!!! That is my new record.
BTW, is everyone ready for friday? Yeah... the airdrop just increased to 300k! WOOHOO
Wow, 5 Onions? The biggest reward I've ever staked was 1 Onion But it's okay for me, my laptop doesn't have the ability to stay on for days and days so I don't stake 24/7. I love my airdropped Onions more |
|
|
|
I read somewhere that they had stolen the account of the development team, I think that in this forum the safety of two factors must be implemented
I remember even though there were 3 users all over the forum slandering Deeponion, and other currencies saying they were scams, and today a year ago, and I see that this coin has remained strong
This is the best response to sycophants, don't you think? Nothing angers haters more than seeing the object of their hate thriving. We are a strong community and an up-and-coming coin which will have a great future, we'll meet a lot of haters in our path to success. What we need to do is to not let them get to us. And we do this by believing in the DeepOnion project. |
|
|
|
DeepOnion was one of the most profitable projects I get as much as Airdrop and Trading! Unfortunately, for some reason, I had sold all my coins in a deserving way, DeepOnion showed that it can be trusted and intelligent, despite all the SPAM issues and accusations, I'll be looking to the future and ONION is in that vision.
Well, if you get the chance, you should buy some Onions back. It's not too late but you never know when the price will skyrocket and you'll be left thinking if only you had bought again |
|
|
|
I wonder that the signature campaign of DeepONION is still available??i see some members are wearing signature of DeepONION but I don't see link to participate! Hope to receive your guide
We just completed week 31 of the 40 airdrops that will be in total. This means you can still join our signature campaign (which is the airdrop) and since you're a junior member you can buy 50 Onions and participate immediately in the next one. Please, read the rules of the airdrop here https://deeponion.org/airdrop.htmlYou need to join the DeepOnion forum, among other things. It's all in the link I've posted. I hope we'll have you with us when the next airdrop comes |
|
|
|
Thank you for airdrop, but here some statistic : 26.1.18 airdrop DeepOnion worth 0.0008011 2.2.18 airdrop DeepOnion worth 0.0006999 9.2.18 airdrop DeepOnion worth 0.0005999 16.2.18 airdrop DeepOnion worth 0.0004999 next week hope will rise again ! If this is your airdrop share than I am sorry for you, but if you just have a really small amount of Onions the share is not that big. The problem with the falling share is, that you probably got no new Onions but with every week more and more participants are joining the airdrop, which makes the percentage for every participant go down. May I ask how many Onions do you have? I think they're comparing the ONION sat price every airdrop week and in his comparison it's going down.. Hence "Hope will rise again" I understand that, but unless they compare it to something stable the comparison is not of value. If Bitcoin is worth $15,000 one week and the next it's worth $18,000 then comparing another coin to Bitcoin will not indicate the other coin's growth. Anyway, that's just my two cents. Or two satoshis. Or whatever |
|
|
|
Why some of the beginners always focus on how they will earn merits and always ranting when there is no merits on every single post? Sometimes it's like you are having a meeting and begging approvals to your co-workers and CEO on your common proposal. We should focus on learning about crypto and making some informative posts that is very helpful rather than focus on earning merits. Some of here are just making another version of an actual post, just putting some incredible attachments for us to say this is unique. Maybe you should focus on how really things work in cryptocurrency because this is the real object you must encounter.
Begging for merits while your posts are qualified and ready to be put on the trash, is very annoying. Merit system is very helpful to us 'cause it inspires us and make a quality post but still, copying and recycling some post is a shitty doings.
I think it's a bit unfair for a Full Member to judge newbies who want to rank up. You have more privileges than them and based on those privileges you can actually make a profit in this forum easier than them. And yes, some of them come to this forum just for this. Would you really blame them? Not everyone is here to learn and enlighten. By the way, posts that complain about newbies who want merits are not unique either |
|
|
|
Thank you for airdrop, but here some statistic : 26.1.18 airdrop DeepOnion worth 0.0008011 2.2.18 airdrop DeepOnion worth 0.0006999 9.2.18 airdrop DeepOnion worth 0.0005999 16.2.18 airdrop DeepOnion worth 0.0004999 next week hope will rise again ! Since Bitcoin is now worth more than it did last week, these numbers don't mean much. This is the reason why I check the dollar charts. We might not like it, but the Dollar is more stable than crypto. So, based on that, I see and increase in price and in the market cap this week. The volume is more or less the same. |
|
|
|
|
Another great Friday! I always liked Fridays but now I love them! I checked and I already got my part of the airdrop. Thanks, DeepOnion team!
|
|
|
|
dammit still can’t be a part of this airdrops. For everyone who feels sorry for me u can send me a bit of your airdrop lol.
Wait, why do you have 30 activity but are not a Junior Member I thought when we get to 30 activity, we get automatic promotion to Junior? Or did this change with the new merit system? Just when I thought I had everything figured out... |
|
|
|
can someone tell me what amazing feature do dash and monero offer that make them have such a high usd value other than being a privacy coin . what i see from Deeponion we have much more to offer than just being a privacy coin we have way more features . the only thing they have more than us is years they have been around for 4 years and we are just born 7 months ago . i guess its just a matter of time until we dominate all
Basically, Monero and Dash were introduced a long time ago as a potential solution to the anonymity problem with bitcoin which is the primary reason why they became popular in the first place in the crypto world. Monero skyrocketed in popularity thanks to its revolutionary features and Dash simply tagged along and this gave them the high ground in the anonymous crypto wars. In comparison, DeepOnion launched recently, but still managed to take off into the stratosphere in a short period of time which says a lot and will catch up with Monero and Dash pretty soon at its current pace. The pace of their development is a lot lower than that of deeponion so you can expect that at some point onion will ride past monero and dash on the way to the moon. Patience is needed, this project is superior to the other privacy coins, no others have achieved this much in such little time. I believe this too, DeepOnion is still very young and very promising. It will have all the time in the world to rise and get even higher than Monero. I believe that the patient holders will be rewarded with very good inverstment returns. |
|
|
|
I just joined this project. I believe this project will succeed.
Welcome! Make sure you visit the DeepOnion forum if you haven't done that yet, to learn about how to join the airdrop and how to participate in bounties and contests if you want to earn some Onions. |
|
|
|
Trust is a bad idea because the moderators are only human. And as humans, they have weaknesses and vices. What's more, these people are not consistently checked so it's not easy to prove when they cross a line and give positive or negative trust based on their personal bias. I've seen it time and time again, when you give a person an ounce of power over another person, this sort of thing will happen if they are left unchecked.
To my understanding, trust isn't controlled by the moderators, though. It's something anyone can give anyone else for any reason. Hence why the forum code allows for being a radical Christian to be enough for a negative trust rating that shows up red in someone's profile. You're right about centralized moderation. It only leads to an abuse of power for a small % of instances. Decentralized forum moderation would be cool. But that's time and resource consuming because you'd have to have about 1000 votes from so many members everyday just to punish or absolve people. Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm far from an expert here, but I thought that the trust system is not open for all to vote. The power to give trust, positive or negative, is something that few members have and since I've only seen it on moderators I assumed it is only a privilege moderators have. In any case, I don't really disagree with what you're saying. I certainly wish there was a better and more fair way to judge members and weed out the bad ones or show the rest of us who should be trusted. You're wrong... sort of. Which is where my problem lies. Anyone can add trust, but there is a group who are "default" trust, and they show automatically to everyone, unless you know your way around and set up your own default trust. If you click on trust, you'll see two lists, one from people you trust (which is the default trust group unless YOU specifically change it), and a second from untrusted members, which just means they aren't on your list. The untrusted feedback doesn't show against the ranking that is displayed under your avatar in posts. To the best of my knowledge, I am not in the default trust list. I'm fine with that, I'm probably too opinionated to be fair. I think the list is too large, and as I demonstrated above, even generally levelheaded members give in to fits of pique. This is why I don't like the system as implemented. I fully understand that the moderators are too few for there to actually be a true centralized ranking system, but over the years, this one has seemed to gather far too much opinion and not enough substance. It doesn't greatly affect me, but I think it unduly influences new people. I've seen far too many examples of both negative and positive trust being given for truly trivial matters, or for matters of opinion that really do not speak to the trustworthiness (from a business sense) of the person being given the trust. In the example above, I actually added neutral trust to BADecker, because even though a positive might balance a negative, I can't stand the guy. But he did not deserve negative trust that I saw. Well, that's more complicated than I thought. In any case, it changes little in my mind about the trust system, since most people don't know how to change their trust list and they have it on default so the power lies with the people in the default trust list. I know people want or even need someone to tell them who to trust and who to avoid but I find that it's better for a person to take some time and decide on their own if they want to do business with another person in here (or anywhere else, really). I, too, have seen examples of the trust system being abused and negative trust being given to people whose only crime was not getting along with those who gave them the negative trust. I don't usually notice when positive trust is being given when it's undeserved but this is also bad. It's just that in the case of an unjustly given negative trust, the consequences are far more severe because negative trust can drive a person out of business in this forum. |
|
|
|
I'm not planing to touch my onions for next few years. I want to know what will happen for about 5,6,7 years. So, I'm not worried about the lower price, that is now, but of course I understand that many would like to do something with their onions now or soon.
I admire your patience. I can hold for a year easily but 5 years or more? And all my altcoins? It would make me antsy. I think that DeepOnion will be the coin that I'll hold the longest. |
|
|
|
Trust is a bad idea because the moderators are only human. And as humans, they have weaknesses and vices. What's more, these people are not consistently checked so it's not easy to prove when they cross a line and give positive or negative trust based on their personal bias. I've seen it time and time again, when you give a person an ounce of power over another person, this sort of thing will happen if they are left unchecked.
To my understanding, trust isn't controlled by the moderators, though. It's something anyone can give anyone else for any reason. Hence why the forum code allows for being a radical Christian to be enough for a negative trust rating that shows up red in someone's profile. You're right about centralized moderation. It only leads to an abuse of power for a small % of instances. Decentralized forum moderation would be cool. But that's time and resource consuming because you'd have to have about 1000 votes from so many members everyday just to punish or absolve people. Correct me if I'm wrong, I'm far from an expert here, but I thought that the trust system is not open for all to vote. The power to give trust, positive or negative, is something that few members have and since I've only seen it on moderators I assumed it is only a privilege moderators have. In any case, I don't really disagree with what you're saying. I certainly wish there was a better and more fair way to judge members and weed out the bad ones or show the rest of us who should be trusted. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
