Eu tava pensando nisso esses dias, bitcoin e altcoins podem tirar muita gente da miséria la na Venezuela e em Cuba também. Se alguém em cuba tiver fazendo campanhas e airdrops, ta vivendo bem, porque lá (Cuba) o salário que o governo paga a todos é o equivalente a 25 dólares. Já pensou? 25 Dólares por mês?

Ele, o moderador do BTT que me deu esse bam, ficou um tópico desses lá na mensagem do ban para mim, só que eu não entendi o ban. Não deveria ser apenas para aquele que incita os membros da comunidade ao invés de banir o usuário? Eu fiquei sem entender... Estava querendo fazer outras campanhas, mas agora tô com o pé atrás, pois todas pedem para o membro fazer os posts semanais no tópico.

MixTum's free trial option works in the following way. Customer sends his 0,001 btc to our mixer, we send him 0,001 btc back which were cleansed through the chain of stock exchanges and charge no commission for that. We issue a letter of guarantee for each order / transaction. This is a test drive allowing the customer to check how [banned mixer] works.

At this point I wouldn't even trust looking at the address bar. It's a lot safer to type it in yourself(or via a browser bookmark). There was this Binance phishing site in the past with the url: biṇaṇce.com. Yes. Take a look at it a bit closer. biṇaṇce.com. There's a dot under both n's. That's tricky as hell.

Take note that legit and secure website read like this (https:) and not secured website has only like read like this (http:) without letter s. This is the only thing I know about secured or legit website and not secured website. I guess there are many good members here that could explain further on your posts. You may create also a thread for this for the newbies. This is very important for the awareness of the new comers here. This will let them avoid  scam and phishing activities.

Caracas eu também não conhecia estas regras, por sinal, deve ter muitas regras aqui que ainda desconheço.
É bom pra gente ficar esperto!

Como saber se as regras são oficiais, se foram atualizadas ou se ainda são vigentes?
Alguém sabe se alguma destas regras foram alteradas ou se existe mais?

Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=759695.0

Incentivizing posting within one or several threads via low effort tasks (e.g. signups or proof of participation for liking, following, subscribing, retweeting, tweeting a single tweet, joining a channel or group, etc.) is not allowed as it falls under the "no altcoin giveaways" rule (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2103687.0):


Accepting signups or requiring proof of participation for tasks requiring substantial effort (e.g. signature campaign signups, weekly social media campaign reports, media (videos, images, articles, etc.) bounty signups, etc.) via a thread posted in Bounties (Altcoins) is allowed though.

EDIT: Obviously, participating in such giveaways is prohibited as well.

Anyone posting info from their bounty application (usernames, addresses, etc.) or anything alongside the lines of "joined X", "looking forward to getting X", "thanks for the opportunity", "filled out form", "signed up for X", "applied", "following / liked / retweeted X" when such data is not required or the requirement is against the forum's rules risk having their account banned. These are extremely low quality posts that generate massive amounts of spam, drowning out any legitimate discussion these threads may posses.

The attack metioned is quite interesting to think about. For example, I use Bitkey in conjunction with an watch-only wallet on Android, where I create the unsigned tx. It could happen that a virus hacks the apk, and creates a new address in the tx, to send the amount to the hacker. But I believe when I import the tx to Bitkey (to be signed) it won't recognize the address (showing that error - Transaction unrelated to your account). Not 100% sure, though. I'd need to test and see.

Is bitblender5iclkw.onion < SCAM a scam/phishing Bit Blender site? I deposited .085 and I have been speaking with support. The TXID for my transaction is here:

2c0aef1a79c51ca0190f49e16a582fd13994ed653edfb695086b9971ad85d68e

The problem seems to be that between this URL: bitblender5iclkw.onion < SCAM and this URL:

bitblendervrfkzr.onion < LEGIT

My deposit addresses are different. Though on both sites I am able to message support and receive answers? I am unable to get a PGP ownership from: bitblender5iclkw.onion but I do have the option to get one from: bitblendervrfkzr.onion < LEGIT

This makes no sense and what I deposited I needed for my electric bill which is about to get shut off.

~

The fact that they're newbies already fucks them over because no one is going to merit them, and that's it, stuck in a deadlock, not just as newbies, but again and again until they reach Hero level.

Sim meu caro, eu sei.
Mas é você que me entendeu errado.

O que eu quis dizer é que lendo a postagem dele (assim como o link postado) eu contei 30 merits enviados dentro de um mês, desde o dia 17/09.
Por isso eu deduzi, não afirmei, que essa seja a quantidade que ele tenha por mês.

Então pelo que eu entendi desse seu post, você tem 30 novos merits/mês para distribuir?
Isso dá uns 56 sMerits em um efeito cascata.
Não é grande coisa, mas com certeza irá ajudar e dar uma animada no pessoal.

I think you have been blocked to his forum by posting spam? or not constructive post? or maybe your Ip is a victim of viruses you can pay your account to unblock it I think 0.0001 btc but it's up to you if you are willing to pay for your account because me I pay my account to unblock it because my Ip was a victim of a virus.

Amanhã já vou ter mais sMerits (se eu estiver certo sobre como o sistema funciona)..
"You are a merit source. The next 0 merit you spend will come from your source rather than your sMerit balance. Merit spent from your source will come back in 30 days. Unused source merit is wasted. It is not allowed for merit sources to sell their merit."

I still hope to unlock
as I did not break any rules specifically ...

33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.[e]

Yes, as we said again and again, we are working on a segwit release (under the lead of Sergey Lappo) and I just got permission to share some insights what our main road blocks are.

We support many account types and Mycelium has many features none of our current devs ever used for any real world purpose. We currently also lack Trezor Model T and Ledger Nano S to test with (we will shortly get those). How does SegWit play together with our local trader platform? How about [Shamir's Secret Sharing](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamir's_Secret_Sharing) (yes, Mycelium supports that. I don't know exactly how but I guess we should make sure not to break it in case any user has his fortune in this) or BitId (we know that for bech32, message signing is not well defined).

So, for the simplest of cases of creating a new HD wallet, SegWit works. I could record a demo or show your the transactions we created with our tests.
With Trezor One we ran into a UI issue that is quite interesting: Our approach is a mixed mode account. That means your receiving address will change from legacy to segwit compatibility with optional segwit native. (Terminology is another topic. Power users would maybe want to see bech32, BIP84/49/44, P2SH segwit, P2WKH_P2SH or something like that.) So when in a payment situation you can present your bech32 address to the payer and if his wallet doesn't recognize it, you can switch to p2sh with a simple click, without having to switch to a different account. Also when you pay a bech32 address, your change will go to a bech32 address to get more privacy. (If change should go to a legacy address when paying a legacy address is still up to debate. I think the current state is that it would go to p2sh instead.) Anyway, account mixing raises compatibility and standardization concerns. Trezor for example handles your bech32 account as a completely separate account from your legacy account. I can spend in mixed mode or from trezor's perspective from several accounts at a time but it gets confused about the change output and that has some scary consequences for Trezor users: If you spend from one account and the change goes into another of your accounts, the trezor will ask the user to confirm **sending** the change. It does indicate that the change would get sent to the trezor again but when paying $12 with my Trezor I get scared when I have to confirm sending $12000 to another address that I have never seen before even if it says "Trezor #1" below the address. So ... we have to see if Trezor has a good solution for that, how keepkey and Ledger deal with this, if we should reduce privacy on hardware wallets to keep support manageable, if we provide mixed mode as an opt-in for the more techy users etc.

So yes, we are working on it and we probably could release it shortly but to avoid scary moments for certain users we would probably have to polish the release a bit. We still have to test all features with the release candidate. And then there is code reviewing. It's +8500-5300 lines of code to review.

bc1 addresses will be part of the initial segwit release. your default receiving address will switch from legacy to p2sh and you can switch it manually to bech32.

True. But if someone has managed to get malware on to my machine then them knowing the balance of my crypto accounts is probably the least of my worries.