I (cmcmc miner) donate 10000 pascalLite for developmen purpose (account 0-10)
Yes donation received! This donation will be used as a bounty payment for the development of Pascal Lite to improve its code and fix all the bugs.
|
|
|
PD not working again
It's online now ! but the lag is real ......... Really wonder what is taking them so long to get this update done. You would think they would do a test version first and see if it works instead of doing these real-time constant updates and affecting the site all day.
|
|
|
I think you guys should just make a new blockchain and delete the old one. It won't get listed on any exchanges with this huge supply.
Or make the old coins worth 10% of new coins.
|
|
|
Maybe the paste I used was crappy (AS5) but it made no difference on any reference GPUs that i've owned. Maybe made a difference on some AIB.
|
|
|
Some updates.
We are working on many of these bugs that need improvement. If you are interested you can see what we changed in the Github.
1. Fixed critical bug with future timestamps 2. Implemented median network time adjustment 3. Fixed memory leaks, wallet is more stable now.
The timestamp bug will have to be done in stages because the way the code is written is that it doesn't take the time from the wallet but instead it uses the time provided by the miner which is set by the local system time. So the wallet now has the correct time set by the network seed nodes however the blocks still get processed using the time set by the miner software; which is the computers local time. Reason is the mining software ignores what the RPC daemon is saying and still uses the system clock. We will however issue a temporarily fix by changing the allowed future time gap from 180sec to 5-15 seconds to tighten the window on the block cheaters. In the future this will be reverted when we implement the correct logic.
Reason why this is not an easy fix is because say that for some reason the network time is incorrect on all the nodes, and all miners have a correct time. Then what will happen is that all the miner's blocks might get rejected. A good example of this is the daylight savings shift.
The wallet should be more stable now since the memory leak is fixed. Before you had to restart the wallet from time to time but now there are no issues after few hours of testing.
So a few more fixes and then I will issue the new wallet which will be version 1.4.3.
There will also be a bounty for development which was donated by CMCMCM which will be in account 0. This will be primarily for software development. So if you are interested in the bounty and have some development experience and can fix some bugs then its for you.
|
|
|
repaste that r9 290 and you can get 1100 core out of it quite easily. at 1.1875v
i like to use the 290x rom and lower mem clocks though.
i have found removing the faceplate dramatically improves potential.
Removing the backplate makes a difference. Repasting any reference GPUs does nothing. Even repasting some AIB does nothing. Just waste of time.
|
|
|
I warned you guys back in November 2016 that this is most likely a scam.
I've been trading forex/stocks/options/futures/cryptos for almost a decade and these types of "signal" services are ALWAYS scams.
Basically it works like this.
The guy probably used some type of robot, or copied other traders signals from myfxbook.com, dukascopy.com, tradeview.com
He had a good month and people started trusting his service and started risking more and more money of their capital.
Problem is that robots eventually start getting beaten by algos that can adapt OR the traders signals have seasonal periods where they work well and periods where they don't work at all.
So all he had to do was pick a period where the markets were ranging and choppy like back during the Dec holiday and make some money. Then later on after Trump got into office and markets started becoming erradic his signal no longer worked
However it was at NO RISK to him because he still made money whether you made money or not.
So its a pretty easy business to be in.
Take a trade and if the trade works... you make money Take a trade and if the trade doesn't work... you still make money.
If he was as good as he said he was then some bank would pay him $10,000,000 a year to trade for them, not to make $100/month per member.
Its common sense and the writings were all over the wall.
|
|
|
My one of friend posted about the similar one thing about a site . That site was giving and I think even at the current also giving manually characterized vanity adress . My friends asked here for the trust of the use of that site , In the thread about 99.99% people said don't use such type of thing because they have your private key , they can steal you . Now here a big thing in my mind that here what percentage should be to believe ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Any better and big fact to believe , because I am interested to buy Please do a search for "split-private key" instead of posting false info.
|
|
|
Then this casino is not a real casino then. Most casinos win in the long run but there is a certain degree of risk with them. They can and do go bust.
But this casino apparently is a "no risk" for them casino.
So if you lose money to them, they win. If they lose money to you, they win also because due to their terms they don't have to pay you.
|
|
|
Was there a major hack recently or is it just a old news as i have not heard anything about the hack. What happened to the live support which i saw the other day after the upgrade.@ Stunna was that a test run, are you planning to go with the live support or stopped because of the high volume. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Yeah there was a major leak by Cloudfare. Lots of sensible data on lots of sites have been leaked, but as far as I know Primedice isn't concerned. At least that's what Stunna and MICRO say. I am aware of the cloudfare leak but i was enquiring about the quote from him that a dash gambling site leaked their unhashed seed and someone kept winning which i am not aware as i never heard about any exploit from any player in recent times. Hope the timing of the update does not have anything to do with the cloudfare leak. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Remember that DASH gambling site which leaked their unhashed seed and some cheater kept only making winning rolls? He finally got caught because his luck just didn't seem like it was believable.
IT was either Dash or Monero one of those. THe leak happened before the Cloudfare incident, search back maybe 2-3 weeks in this forum and you will find it. No idea if the cloudfare had anything to do with that leak however since the cloudfare is considered to leak very small amounts of data.
|
|
|
Well the way it works is pretty simple. You can invest that in some new and up coming Casinos. If they are still around in 1 years time you stand to make multiples of your investment. However since most up and coming Casinos usually have capital issues, its very easy for a huge whale gambler to come and clean them out. Like that "fun-casino" which doesnt have enough bankroll to issue deposits.
Its much safer investing in larger casinos such as PrimeDice who will never have liquidity issues, however PrimeDice doesn't have a program to invest in. So you are pretty much stuck.
|
|
|
Hi,
Could you give me estimate of both (insensitive and sensitive)
1DiceBack
Thanks
1DiceBack case sensitive has a difficulty of 50,656,515,217,834, or 50 trillion. Using his rate of 0.0025 BTC/trillion, it would cost you 0.125 BTC, and would probably take a few weeks at least to find. 1DiceBack insensitive has a difficulty of 778,316,249,440, so it would cost you ~0.002 BTC. Could get you a very ugly address though, like 1diCEbACk. This is all going off the rates on his thread. Yes correct. Issue is that its a very long vanity address. If you can shorten it, then it would be cheaper. Thank you. 0.125 is out of my budget for this month. Will try to include it in for April as I like the idea. You can also just get the case-insensitive one and that will be much cheaper.
|
|
|
What's the syntax ? doesn't work for me at the moment ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Can`t run for solo. And bat, and with modded configuration file. P.S. " Payload prefix from daemon is of an unexpected size." I'm getting the same and it's not mining... [09:32:08] Payload prefix from daemon is of an unexpected size. [09:32:08] Initialising kernel pascal.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024 [09:32:09] Initialising kernel pascal.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024 [09:32:09] Initialising kernel pascal.cl with nfactor 10, n 1024 [09:32:19] Waiting for work to be available from pools. [09:32:52] Payload prefix from daemon is of an unexpected size. (5s):0.000 (avg):0.000h/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.000/m Yeah I just tried it and got the same thing. I also got the same issue with PascalCoin 1.5.0 Maybe we need to set a special node name and such. Maybe you guys can ask Wolf0 for some info on how to run it. @xiphon @adaseb
Dont want to put an issue on github myself, but if you want, please do.
Tx bug - miner work repeating from start Every time a transaction is published on the network, daemon issue new work to miner to include latest tx, as result miner start again from the beginning work. If tx would be as many as possible per block can handle, this would lead to network lag and crawl as pow submitted by miner will be invalid if not all tx is included. Work around a. possible integration of existing getblocktemplate into pascal lite. b. set max tx inclusion per work(1block). Bitcoin does have size limit. (ugly but can do)
Note: documentation only.
The work is restarted from scratch but since the hashing is completely random it shouldn't be an issue. Since each hash is independant of the prior. Is this what you are asking or did I read it incorrectly?
|
|
|
I got a few more of these to sell
WTS @ 90 SATS per coin
PM me
|
|
|
This is the reason why whenever a new casino is opening up, we demand to see their bankroll because so what if the max bet is like 20 BTC when even if someone wins that bet, there are insufficient funds and the casino won't pay out anyways.
Casinos like this should be more transparent and limit their max BTC to avoid any exposure to losses they can't cover.
They really should get a bank loan or 2nd mortgage to cover these loses.
|
|
|
This is not the first time that happens and probably not the last one. Always Safedice will be back to life as soon as admin get back online. Think positive
It was only down the other day for 30 minutes. Just doing some maintenance. No worries. No worries but it's always great to warn users. Especially when there is a whole thread dedicated to your site on a forum :3 Doesn't cost much and always cool. Of course. We will do this in the future. As long as the Admin tells me I will always update it here. In the future you guys should just Geotag your traffic and find out where the majority are gambling from. So if the majority of gamblers is located in the USA then do the maintenance something during the night so most won't be affected.
|
|
|
You guys really need to use different fees for your transaction. Just go to https://bitcoinfees.21.co/ and use their API. If you don't trust that site there is another one out there that can give you an API feed. Because sometimes there are transaction spammers and the fee can go all the way up to 200 Sats/byte to get it confirmed within the hour. Normally people want to place bet after bet after bet, but if its delayed for 24 hours then they won't have BTC to gamble on your site.
|
|
|
We are changing seeds in 24 hours. This is routine security for the website. If anyone has any issues feel free to contact me directly. Thanks for your understanding guys, you're awesome (Majority ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) )! That's odd ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Probably because of that Cloudfare leak or some other type of seed leak. Remember that DASH gambling site which leaked their unhashed seed and some cheater kept only making winning rolls? He finally got caught because his luck just didn't seem like it was believable.
|
|
|
|