|
Have already withdrawn my coins from the exchanges that I frequently use just to be safe (and to somehow get a chance to gain BCC tokens). The exchange that I use, coins.ph mentioned that they are all in for SegWit and will not be handling BCC tokens to their users unlike Kraken. Also, they would be freezing all deposits and withdrawals until the chain stabilizes. Every service follows this just to avoid confusion and whatnot.
|
|
|
|
I'm a little confused. So, bitcoin will be splitting, and what is the main coin?  At August 1, 12:20 PM UTC, the chains will split into two, Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash. The main chain would be the one who will get the most hash rate from the miners. I'm opening up the possibility that bitcoin cash would gain some strength and to give BCC some form of respect for voicing out their opinions re: scaling issue of bitcoin. |
|
|
|
You can simply go to fullssh.com and make your desire ssh accordingly your region.And your validity of SSH server will be 3days only.There is a video which can help you to do alone. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ytUjhazKe3Mi just need payload numbers Payloads vary greatly from region to region and telco providers. The one that I'm using for my own connection might not work on your region. You need to do this on your own then afterwards, set up an SSH account then you're good to go. how i can find it is there list or any things? Idk if there are any information about that somewhere in Google but you can try to do a quick search about it. Include your region and your telco provider and some results might appear. Most of the payloads that I use are just sites that can be accessed by my carrier by default without eating up my mobile data allowance, to give you a hint. |
|
|
|
You can simply go to fullssh.com and make your desire ssh accordingly your region.And your validity of SSH server will be 3days only.There is a video which can help you to do alone. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ytUjhazKe3Mi just need payload numbers Payloads vary greatly from region to region and telco providers. The one that I'm using for my own connection might not work on your region. You need to do this on your own then afterwards, set up an SSH account then you're good to go. |
|
|
|
|
Your balance would still be there during and after the fork. However, just to be safe it's better to import your private keys into another wallet which you have full control with. Blockchain.info is notorious to have too many bugs. Might wanna save yourself from days of depression when the fork happens.
|
|
|
|
|
Whatever you learn in trading, you will get mostly from doing it first hand. 90% of your knowledge in trading will come from actual trades, the remaining 10% you will read from paper. Losing money in your first days as a trader is fine. It's expected; just don't tilt and go full retard. You need to take note of what wrong have you done in your previous trades and use that knowledge to come back stronger.
|
|
|
|
|
Once a professional dota player here in our country before I went to college. I'm still following the eSports scene, especially CS:GO and Dota 2 and am very much familiar with the teams and the current meta. I'm set for the Internationals which kicks off in ~2 weeks. You can send me a pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I, for one agrees to this. However, services create their own campaign to advertise their brand around the forum. Having a minimum post might be the most economical way for them to sell their name, but at the expense of post quality in this forum. Why not only allow campaigns with a pay/post rule rather than a fixed/week? The latter seems to attract more careless, spammy posts over the former. Also, the blacklist of members for signature campaigns would also be a great help to somehow reduce the spam here.
|
|
|
|
|
If the market is similar to 2014-2015 where price is stagnant for weeks, then yes you can try to do arbitrage trading without the worry of losing too much value while you're transferring coins from one exchange to another. Right now the change in price is so fast that you wouldn't be able to profit off of arbitrage, plus selling it in localbitcoins would also take up a lot of time before being sold.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not a BCC supporter and don't promote them in any way, but does that mean that even if a majority rules something decentralized, the minority couldn't present their own ideas and let the community decide? I know, it's just a stripped-down implementation with much of its code being copied from SegWit, but what they're exercising is voicing out their opinions and plans in re: scaling issue for bitcoin.
But seriously, why go for BCC unless you have other agenda in mind?
|
|
|
|
|
Raping alone is evil, what more with juvenile rape? Death penalty should really be vested into such extreme cases like this, just like what most Middle Eastern countries do to immigrants/tourists that disobeyed the law. We cannot give these sexual predators any second chances; they will just use the tax payers' money while in jail.
|
|
|
|
|
Verified the signed message using Core and Electrum. Best we can do for now is to wait for either of them to handle your concern knowing that they have been busy on working on the new forum that we will be transferring. When I got my account hacked, I waited for 3 days for them to reply.
|
|
|
|
Why that when i post or reply an error occured?
Sometimes it saves as draft.
Member group posting limits. Since you are a newbie, expect that you can send a PM, reply to a thread or create a new post every 360 seconds. The interval between posts will gradually decrease as you gain more activity and reach a higher rank. To understand more of this, kindly read this thread. |
|
|
|
|
Most of the posts in Steemit that are backed by whales are from their acquaintances too, and you will not gain anything from Steemit unless someone of a high Steemit power upvotes your post. But in any case, you might want to have at least 20 people in your group to make significant upvotes for you guys to earn something significant.
|
|
|
|
|
There had been several threads in the gambling sub-forum which depicts the same type of challenge but different goals to no avail. Mostly are achieved through sports betting and other gambling games like poker or dice.
Also, wrong board. Move this to Gambling Discussion where it can appropriately be discussed.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't support an implementation that was rushed within 3 months and made by "unhappy" people with SegWit yet copied the codes and changed them into something they can call their own. Most of these people who support the said implementation are the miners from Bitmain.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, if you have 1 btc you will get 1 bcc token that can be traded as well. That basically is free money, though I think people would straight up buy BCC in exchanges but rather just dump them and keep their bitcoins with them. A much fascinating scenario is if whether or not all the profits in BCC would go directly to BTC. That will be a huge boost in price.
|
|
|
|
|
Must be a forum bug since theymos did a global post recount. Also, I believe that if a mod "nuked" a user, it will delete all of its post history, but the rank status would remain as is. I forgot which mod said that but that's what I recall back in 2015 regarding accounts that have been nuked by mods.
|
|
|
|
Let's assume that Bitcoin doesn't die in a few hundred years from now on, and our descendants (or even us ourselves if we manage to live that long) could reclaim these coins (coins that didn't move all that time) as public property for the common good
If you're looking that far into the future presumably brute force hacking could have improved so much that the missing bitcoins could be recovered. In fact, we don't need that We don't need to wait till advanced brute forcing becomes available (through quantum computing or otherwise). Actually, we don't need to wait any time at all. All we need is consensus what to do with lost coins and consensus in respect which coins to consider as lost. If we have both we can easily retrieve the coins that we think as lost. We would only need to make a few small changes to protocol (i.e. the way Bitcoin transactions are processed). For example, if it becomes known for certain that Satoshi is dead (provided he was alive in the first place at all, of course), and no one is going to claim his coins (his heirs or beneficiaries), we could retrieve and share them among all active Bitcoin holders (or spend them on something useful) Why would we need to vote something for what's already deemed as irretrievable? Voting to recover coins that are already lost is stupid and just makes available coins be less of what it's worth today. The key idea of a deflationary coin is to make available resources scarce over time to increase its value. Also, we aren't so sure if these coins really are lost or kept very well in cold storages Well, there are other options In fact, we don't actually need to get back the coins which are considered as irretrievable and lost for good. We could just raise the cap if we ever need that. If you are going to ask whether we will ever need that, I should just point out an important thing which almost all deflationary coin supporters invariably miss. The point is that scarcity by itself is not enough to make something valuable. That something should be useful at that, or rather, in the first place. So it is actually an inverted U-curve on a scarcity-value chart. If something is as abundant as air, it won't cost anything even if it is as vital as air. On the other hand, or rather end, when something is infinitely scarce it will lose value because it will be quickly made irrelevant. Say, there is no more air, therefore everyone quickly dies, and air loses all value soon thereafter. Whoever (or whatever) manages to survive without it will no more need it altogether, i.e. it will be of no value to them despite its infinite scarcity As long as there are people who agrees that something has value, no matter how abundant it is, there would always be a price tag for it. I don't know if we're on the same page, but apparently manipulating the 21 million cap would defeat its purpose of limited availability, and I don't think that the hard-coded limit would ever be changed even after our lifetimes. Also, people tend to find value/price on nearly everything that they see. I wouldn't be surprised if someday, water will be monopolized just like some basic necessities that we have today. |
|
|
|
|
These renowned investors, including Warren Buffet might not have the slightest clue of what they're saying about bitcoin. We get it, most of these guys are bankers and trust and support the banking system that's why they keep on saying these negative things about bitcoin. They might be experienced and well-versed in investing but their definition of a pyramid scheme is way off. No one is recruiting anyone to get their money to buy bitcoin. It is the buyer's personal choice.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
