Are you talking about yourself ? Lol We did not cheat anyone, We can't accept unfounded accusations. Even though I disagree with the direction (lottery) there is no-one that can say you do not support and work hard on this coin. It also has a great Idea behind it. Are people using this to get around Geolocation for streaming? I wonder what the latency is compared to dedicated vpn services? Has there been any been any benchmarks? With all the geo blocking going on this service should be exploding. Unless there are lag or connection issues.
|
|
|
Someone has asked me to unlock this topic. So there you go.
Someone huh? Lol
|
|
|
Want to sell this project for 100BTC with source code? At least have a working blockchain. I'm sure I can finish it with more enthusiasm and turn into something really useful.
Jump on this silk if it's legit. Your other Devs have let us all down. This may be the only thing that can turn this coin around. No-one really believes this bank negotiation thing anyway.
|
|
|
I also dislike being used to push someone else's hidden agenda.
At first sight it seems your client is a dark investor who wants to prevent a possible legal dispute regarding the Dash brand. You assume the role of a facilitator to reach a peaceful solution to that dispute, however you offer your help to the "Dashcoin Community" in submitting an objection application to prevent Dark from trademarking Dash.
Also, contrary to what you claimed in your main post directed at the community, the tone of Evan's response is not "exploratory as to what the Dashcoin Community wants in order to resolve the dispute between Dashcoin and Darkcoin/Dash" not even very loosely interpreted. You are also pressuring Evan regarding other matters not related at all with the rebranding to dash.
This makes me highly suspicious of your intentions.
I've been wondering about how many of these peops trying to pressure DASH just bought DSH for this purpose.
|
|
|
Good news for Monero - bitcoin.org votes against any hard Bitcoin forks Bitcoin.org Hard Fork Policy
Contentious hard forks are bad for Bitcoin. At the very best, a contentious hard fork will leave people who chose the losing side of the fork feeling disenfranchised. At the very worst, it will make bitcoins permanently lose their value. In between are many possible outcomes, but none of them are good.
The danger of a contentious hard fork is potentially so significant that Bitcoin.org has decided to adopt a new policy:
Bitcoin.org will not promote software or services that will leave the previous consensus because of an intentional and contentious hard fork attempt.
This policy applies to full node software, such as Bitcoin Core, software forks of Bitcoin Core, and alternative full node implementations.
It also applies to wallets and services that have the ability to detect the contentious hard fork, and which release code or make announcements indicating that they will cease operating on the side of the previous consensus. It does not apply to software that cannot detect the contentious hard fork and which continues doing whatever it would’ve done anyway.
To be clear, we encourage wallet authors and service providers to offer their opinions on hard fork proposals, and we will not penalize anyone for contributing to a discussion. We will only stop promoting particular wallets and services if they plan to move their users onto a contentious hard fork by default.
Posted to the Bitcoin.org Site Blog on 16 June 2015
https://bitcoin.org/en/posts/hard-fork-policyThis official bitcoin.org note is important for Monero world. Thereby, Bitcoin remains with 1M block size, and will be suitable for low number of transactions per block. So that leads for block to contain large transactions only or transactions with large fees only. And we can promote Monero as direct Bitcoin counterpart for unlimited number of transactions per block with additional great bonus of academical-proven anonymity. Good for alts in general.
|
|
|
I finally had the time to finish up the Presentation and I'm very impressed. I especially like the way the descriptions are clear and concise without being ambiguous or overly complex. I've seen far too many convoluted presentations that try to confuse in the guise of explaining in order to instill awe. Very well done. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEVm1dMn5Ks
|
|
|
Dev, Do you have youtube channel with tutorials? Maybe you should place bounties for people to answer these questions and post them to a channel?
|
|
|
Not to mention (guess I am) that even if this coin ever changes it's name it would not be a rebrand apparently the OP doesn't even know what a rebrand is.
|
|
|
W0w anyone that believes this is a retard, it's not even spelled the same.
|
|
|
The following was posted in the btc speculation thread............. A little entertainment in these boring times: Erik Vorhees is redirecting New York and North Korean customers who try to use ShapeShift to this page: http://pleaseprotectconsumers.org/Haha! North korea and New York! 2 Police states.
|
|
|
Anyone got a link to that 75btc dump, I lost it and have a need for a good laugh.
|
|
|
Reading the history...is that free VPN for BCT accounts older than xyz still active?
Too late to get free coins and dump, maybe next coin? So the answer to my question seems to be "no, that offer is over", thank you. If you feel the urge to substantiate your insinuation, go ahead, I am actually curious what might have caused it. In the meantime, I'll hold the coins I paid for. Grumpy morning.
|
|
|
There is a clear case of intent here.
I just wish "a clear case of intent" would be all that's needed to put the lying illuminatis, banksters, politicians and media behind the bars as well... Hear hear!
|
|
|
Where is our overweight developer ? I haven't seen him post in a while..
chattin to him right now recording a missive. what're you doin? I'm mining moneritos, I keep the network secure for you guys, yep, you're welcome.. We don't need your botnet.
|
|
|
Reading the history...is that free VPN for BCT accounts older than xyz still active?
Too late to get free coins and dump, maybe next coin?
|
|
|
Looking good.
|
|
|
We need a configured VM file for running a node.
|
|
|
|