I've nuked them all, there's no need to put additional tags on them.

~Lauda

No. There is no such thing called a standard fee, default fee or whatever some members are trying to tell you. What 'truly' [1] matters here is the satoshis/byte included at the time and the current recommended one. The recommended fee can be found here. This means that a transaction fee (X) might be enough for transaction A, but it might be inadequate for transaction B (due to differentiating sizes).

---

[1] - This is probably not the right wording.

I assume that in this type of shadow ban, their posts that were made during the shadow-ban never become visible to the users and never count towards anything (even after it expires). Is this correct? Only in such a case could this be acceptable.

I dislike this idea. It is counter-intuitive when it comes to banning. Most of the bans here are either because of spam (bots and permabanned people) and signature spam. Letting either one of those groups of people post under the impression that they have not been punished does not make sense.

Exactly.

I've already reported this to a developer and he's on it. Thank you for the report, however this is not the right place to be reporting bugs/problems. In case that you do find any problems report it on the Github page here.

~Lauda

No. A higher block size limit does not solve this "problem".

Transactions are not slow. The transaction time is the same as it has always been (near instant). Please stop posting nonsense.

A implementation was not promised and the people who were at the Hong Kong meeting are not Core representatives. They can and have only represented themselves. Learn the difference.

Ne baš. Pridruzi nam se u IRC kanalu pa ces moci lako provjeravati cijene na (gotovo) svim trzistima bez otvaranja ikakvih web-stranica.

To nije nista posebno. Za one koji su interesirani: Bitcoin Ticker Widget ili Bitcoin Paranoid Walltime (Android).

5000 Yuan je upravo probijen. Prosjek cijene je preko $760770. Moram da postam svoj glavni GIF:

Stop posting bullshit and go back to Ver's forum. The correct statement is:

A tiny fraction of people whom don't even have a lot of assets in Bitcoin.

It's a lie.

Classic is dead.

No. Nobody is supposed to pick any numbers. People will received random rewards. Read it again:

Which version of the software do you have?

Go into Debug window (Network traffic), is the received or the sent data higher? Some statistics could help out when it comes to figuring out the best solution for your problem. Are you running a node by any chance (since it is unusual to leave a wallet open constantly otherwise)?

You are using Bitcoin-QT? You do realize that that is an outdated wallet? I highly recommend upgrading to Bitcoin Core 0.12.1. Additionally, you should provide us with more information. If we assume that the wallets only spend download bandwidth (they need to synchronize with the network), we are looking at a maximum of (only for blocks):
4 320 MB of download per month (assuming 6 blocks hourly, multiplied by 24 and 30) - This number can way due to the total amount of blocks found in that time period + the amount of space that each block takes (this is why I've used 'a maximum of').
Are you constantly running these wallets, or do you just open them occasionally when in use?

---

Updated a clarification.

Please read the thread and stop posting numbers! There will be no draw. MJ will randomly assign prizes.

I doubt that. Not all of the posts/threads that are deleted/trashed are spam.

The 'URL' would not work for trashed and deleted threads. We could only manually copy the body. We have a few patterns that we look out for. You can just stick around in the speculation section and will encounter various spam. Additionally, our own system might be less effective if we make patterns public.

What did I just read?

---

OP, please read the following: Still Don't Get Bitcoin? Here's an Explanation Even a Five-Year-Old Will Understand. Please do not make additional thread based on assumptions and please start asking question since it is obvious that you understand almost nothing.

No. That is not a solution. Stop posting false information.

To whom have you reported it to? You certainly have not used the 'Report to Moderator' function (recently) found near each post as I can't find your report:

---

You have to understand that it is tough to make decisions when the staff does not understand the language in question. Just trusting 'Google translate' or a single member/report is not enough to take instant action. I'll ping Cyrus.

This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: Insubstantial thread.

Nisu realna ne zbog odabrane cijene, nego zbog nacinja razmisljanja i navedenih razloga. Kao sto ljudotina govori, ima tu smisla, a tek ako uhvati investitore 'FOMO' (fear-of-missing-out, za one koji ne znaju) tek bi tada mogli da vidimo stvarno neocekivane cijene. Samo pogledajte ovo:
Izmedu 1k i 10k je ~1400 Bitcoina na prodaji. Ako prebrzo 'probije' psiholosku barijeru, onda je zasigurno da moze dosta vise dostici.

---

Another manipulation attempt. The upload rate yesterday was higher then the average for my node as well. The backlog has cleared now and all 'reasonable' transactions should confirm very quickly:

---

I was told Bitcoin was going to die?

I onda bi pokusao da vratis na banku? Ako ti je to cilj, onda svakako ne bih preporucio. Jako kontroliraju protok novca iz i u drzavu. Mozes se samo sresti s problemima, a neces imati neke koristi.