Physical Bitcoin coin = loaded

Physical Bitcoin token = not loaded

makes it easy

No pre-order, not loaded

Color me confused. Which is it, for lot 2?

Surely it must have been an error due to the placement order of the lots in the former quote, aye?

Lot 2 @ 0.0199 BTC
Lot 3 @ 0.0009 BTC
Lot 1 @ 0.0009 BTC

You got it.  Block 572,505 chooses the 4/20 winner.

Ok I will take the last four

Okay.. 2 more random plz. I can go with out eating tonight

Edit- & well played steam. You deserve the W.

2: 0.126

Lot 1 @ .27 BTC

I wouldn't call it a scam but it's extremely unethical and opens the door TO a scam, yes. Damn - I didn't know about this those - time to do some catch up on the year I missed. This place is always pumping out something new it seems.

That is an explicit, intentional lie.

You very clearly have no understanding what it means to have integrity -- you make excuses and provide cover for those who steal from others (but help you), and you lie about those who are critical of you.

You are a disgrace to Bitcoin and to this forum. 

This is some messed up logic. Money changes everything. Friendships get destroyed because of money issues. Monetary trust is the highest form of trust. That's why sites with feedback systems sees this as a vital part of their service. Even Bitcointalk USED TO allude to monetary trust (Trade with caution red tag).

Theymos should remove that statement in the red tag. It's a lie. The Trust System has become "How I feel about this user." How Millennial.

Well, then let me educate you how the trust system works since you don't understand.  If you trust someone with your money, you leave them a trust rating reflecting as such.  If you don't trust their judgement of others, you exclude them from your network.  Unless of course your motive is to try and damage someone's reputation and not have an honest trust system, then you troll them on the forum for years and don't leave them trust even though you trust them with your money.

It's a lie that I feel it was ok for Quickseller to escrow.  I don't.  I think it wasn't as bad as minerjones doxxing Canaryinthemine or minerjones allowing TMAN to manipulate his own auctions minerjones was hosting, so I don't feel he should be trolled for all eternity over it.  I don't support what he did, and certainly don't think it was OK.  I think it was a misguided attempt to hide his personal info and he's been punished for it.  His rep doesn't disappear because I made a deal with him.  He also has positive ratings from others, so why am I the only one who is singled out and harassed because of it.  The whole thing stinks of ulterior motives and it isn't exactly hard to see for those who take the time to read.

I honestly don't understand why you guys try so hard to connect me to Quickseller to the point you keep spreading these lies.  You're blowing smoke up the community's ass and expecting everyone to believe there's fire.

Let me turn the tables on you...  Lauda did a non-transparent escrow with minerjones and Blazed that resulted in the claimed losses of millions of dollars for investors.  Do you feel that is better than Quickseller trying to hide his address and refunding the users their fees?  I'm just trying to understand why some users can rip off the community for millions, be completely non-transparent, make the unilateral decision to release funds to the scammer, give no compensation while profiting from their role in the scam, and that's fine with you.  Help me understand.



I don't have NastyMining income.  I literally receive 0 directly from NastyMining as it all goes to NastyFans, so I know this is a lie by Vod.  He doesn't even grasp the structure enough for his lies to make any sense.  I'm glad that people are starting to see the lies though.