The meaning of this sentence, as it is written, is not correct. The growth of bitcoin depends from the technology which produce it. And is (for the moment) 25 bitcoins every about 10 minutes. So having nothing to do nor with Governments and nor with other things. It will be the correct one if it was written the growth of the known of the bitcoin is totally depends on the policy of the governments.

I agree with the explanations given following the above sentence (if written in the correct mode) but the word "totally" seems a little excessive. I agree that if the bitcoin will be regulated by The Government of one country would be a great day for bitcoin and its known and spreed in that country will be much more fast, but there are even other way in which it can be known. In my country bitcoin is not yet regulated and I know much about it. In the USA before the regulation existed to many people which knew and used regularly it before its regulation from the Authorities. The same in all the world. So the known of bitcoin is not totally  depend from the policy of Governments. There are to many others ways in which this thing can be make true.

This is a very controversial question and it is mainly an ethical matter than an economic one. If it will be handled only as economical one for sure make good. The big demand rise the price of bitcoin and this show and strength the power of it. But if we go further and see for what this bitcoin is used and who buy it then the things changes. That big amount of bitcoin is bought by a criminal (or some of those) and its use (or even part of it) will be for sure used by this criminal (or criminals) for bad purposes (even if it will be used only to feed him or those). In this kind of view the opinions are divided. Some people don't care about this second part of interpretation and think that their action do good to bitcoin. The seconds ones, which put in balance what is right and what is wrong and then decide choosing the right, think that their action do bad to bitcoin making the others to think that bitcoin is used mostly by the criminals and for doing bad things. I'm part of the second group.

Knowing their opportunism and ability to smell and "predict" the best future for those, this thing, even it is against their actual formal rules versus bitcoin, have big probabilities to be true. Their first motto in development and living (declared by Mao Zedong at 1956 but not an original him's idea) was: Lets flourish 100 flowers, lets fight 100 schools. One of the interpretations of this phrase is development in any way possible without having in mind any kind of prejudice or obstacle or without creating barriers to all the possible future development. They understand that bitcoin could have a big future and are preparing themselves to be ready for that time.

It was the only last thing that misses to Karpeles. Now its bucket is full with feats. Remain only to count those and to convert (in the right proportion) in jail years. And then even double those. Having in mind all the people who lost their wealth because of him this is the minimum to be made.

If it will be such price for bitcoin in this period your will have a little gift from me. Learn my nick (write it in some place to not forget) and when the price will arrive such amount pm me. I will send you as a sign of appreciation an amount of satoshi. This is an official promise. You can stake this my post in order to have it as a prove of my engagement.

Firs the money are not created (stamped) by the (commercial) bank (as you mean) but by the Central Bank of every country (or the Authority which have such role in the given country).

If bitcoin will be regulated and being legal (meaning affirmed by you) that's will be good for him in that country. Will be more easily spread and used in that country. But that's all. Bitcoin cannot be used as national currency of no one country for to many reasons. Firs of all because it is owned by it. Second because is decentralized and cannot be controlled only by that (one) country. The are even other factors which cannot allow such adoption. But if it will be possible to be national currency of some country and will be managed right the answer would be that the problems with the overproduction (stamped) money in that country will be much more few.

Thanks for the comment.

Where have found you in the main post the the centralized digital coin is a "government" coin? Can you show here the exact sentence in which is expressed such thought?

Then another question. Why use you the dollar or every kind of "governmental" money (in my country the money is controlled by the Central Bank and not from Government)? Why don't you live without those? Maybe you can use the barter system. It could be not controlled so easy from the Government and you will be more free.

In which world do you live you addy boy? Do you know that this post can be considered as spam here? And this can make possible your ban from the forum? It is out of everything and have no any meaning. Watch to yourself and ask: what I am doing?

Anyhow I am trying to bring you in Earth. Read very well the main post and if have something to tell about what is written there will be welcomed to write here your thoughts about that post.

Do a search within yourself and stay in peace. Hope that you will find good reasons and right meanings to understand well what you have written in your post and what I am answering to you.

After the bots Bitmixer are presenting another phenomenon. Who knows which kind of surprises will offer in the future this site....

You must define what do you mean with "very high figures".

But a priory my answer it will be following. Depends firstly from the number of bitcoins you have and the need for house you have. And from the market of the houses where you live. I will buy a house with bitcoin only if I would have minimum the double of bitcoins which I will spend to buy the house (not true in your case), if I will be in high need for a house and probably if the market of houses in my country will be a good one - which mean that the value of my house will be greater in the future (with big probabilities because no one known how it will be the prices of this kind of products in the future). Otherwise will try to buy it with normal money (with credit in your case).

You will have always the bitcoins as a warranty if you will take a credit. So why use bitcoin which can have much higher price in the future?

If you believe that the above "high figures" mentioned by you will be the upper limit of the price of bitcoin no one of my abovereasoning have meaning for you. But I think that the max price of bitcoin needed to much time to be reached. Not so early. In those suppositions are based all my above thoughts.

Anyhow these are only guessings. Everyone know himself what is best and is worst for him. So the right decision can be taken only by you.

Another course about bitcoin and its technology offered this time from Princeton University. Another big news. One the most prestigious in the world. Cannot be possible to not accept or respect the subject of this course. I don't understand why Bitcoin Foundation don't do publicity using such kind of news. Are the best ones that explain, without arguments and only naming this fact, the potential and the power of bitcoin.

Bitcoin Foundation has one of its main aim the promotion of bitcoin. Where can find those a best example than this? If the Universities create and hold courses about bitcoin this is the maximum of seriousness had for the subject of the course. They do only meetings between developers, investors etc. While must work with the simple people. They are the very power of bitcoin. They are its users. They need trust and faith to know and use bitcoin. No one then the knowledge of the organization of courses by such kind of universities can give them such kind of truth and faith in bitcoin. This must be made from the Bitcoin Foundation. Make possible the known of this kind of facts.

I am not sure about your part in bold if the average joe will see in the publicity made to the bitcoin even that the value of it is waited to be very high in the future (with the needed warnings) and the the fact that it is accepted by Microsoft and Dell to buy their products. Then even from to many other - more or less known merchants - in all the world. Then reading the info about it offered about it only by Wikipedia. Then all the other info about it that can be found in internet (if will do a simple search),

If the average joe will be lazy and will not have the desire to do all the above things, I think that it can be even only the first publicity which can make him curious about bitcoin and to try it.

Are you sure or are telling something only to write a posts? The hyip are the most pure form of scam. Those have not any source from where come the money earned by the users and all the money which circulate on those online "businesses" are the money of the new investors. It is the classic form of Ponzi scheme. If you continue with those (if really you have earnings since this moment) you will lose all your money (earned and yours).

And in any way must not be suggested to the new users of bitcointalk. Seeing this kind of publicity here and attracted from the high profits offered by those everyone can be tempted to try. The probability to win  something it will be only if it will be between the firsts but this kind of earnings create truth and make the user to go forward. Then will be the normal end. The loss of everything.

Can you show me some strategies and in which way the experience affect the earnings in gambling? I want to win some money in gambling and need to learn how. It is not the firs time that i ask these things to various "professionists" in gambling but never has had an answer. Only various words. Naturally the knowledge must give approx even the probability they have to earn. If are not an secret.

A little hard to understand you.    You have in mind to leave bitcoin because of being hopeless and then have in mind to arrive the target (of earnings) 0.2 bitcoin in a week. How is possible this my friend? If you leave bitcoin from where will come your 0.2 bitcoin in a week?    

Or I have not understand well your thoughts in your post?

A little hard for me to understand your explanations. My not native English and your "complicated" and "sophisticated" explanations make me to formulate in another way my part in bold.

It will be reliable for you a centralized digital coin (with the same or better qualities like bitcoin), created from an investment of one rich person or group of peoples (investors) which will be not only the producers of it (will create and own the only pool or the various pools of mining of the digital coin) but even its owners? Do you use you such kind of digital coin if it will be in the market?

This sentence have meaning for gambling and not for investing. The real investment, made after the needed analysis, can be risky and this is told and can be known during the previous mentioned action, but never so risky as in gambling when everything is luck and nothing reasoning. In the (right) investment, the normal one, must be the business plans, the way in which the resources will (shall) be managed, the time of returns, the amounts of returns, the probability to not arrive the objectives and t many others data that make possible reasoning about it. So have to do at all with the possibility to lose but with the possibility to win. It is a totally other thing the gambling when your sentence have full right to reign. 

I bet that your grandma cannot use even the smartphone or the computer. That's doesn't mean that bitcoin is not easy to use. I find its use less complicated then the previous ones mentioned in the first sentence. That's first. The second have to do again with the same subjects. The smartphone and the computers are much more known than bitcoin and yet are innumerable the ways of advertising made to those. So, why not the same strategy for bitcoin?

If you will play betting with 1 satoshi every round that's ok. But attention in the moment when you will (if) bet 2 satoshi. If you will do this you will lose for sure. This amount will be always bigger and bigger and one day (again) for sure you will lose all your winnings. Then you will play with your money to win the money you have lost. And it will be another in the days to come your will lose even your money. No one can win against the casino or the online gamble site in long term.

Even him stopped the gambling 10 years ago. But when the damage is made. He has yet today debits to repay. Its weakness now don't exist anymore. It was only for some months. Like your case. But are others that may have this period of its life if we do publicity or don't fight the gambling. We must choose the most fair thing to do.

You tell that he has made the week with 8 days. If is this the reason it is not fair. This week must have 6 days. One day less mean less possibility to have the maximum from your weekly work. I had no need for that posts the previous week because was over the max of posts even without those. So are gone in vain. While for this week may have need for those.

I made again the calculations. Even if the previous week was calculated with 8 days I am yet 2 posts less. Are nothing but this put in doubt that is the 8 days week the reason of all this mess.

I hope that it will be an explanation. Anyhow 17 post are not few. No problem if there are a reason. Even I cannot understand how it will be possible this thing. But let's wait him's explanations.