stellar.org
Hab ich sogar schon gemacht und paar geschenkt bekommen ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) man konnte die aber nicht minen oder?
|
|
|
0 400000 512 <threads> creates ~107gb files
This will run without any -Xmx option, max i can run on Windows (32 Bit java?) is -Xmx1000m which allows me to use 1024 instead of 512
|
|
|
hi,dev, i have change the nexdefault.propertity, other computer still can't connect to the wallet, is it the same as i just open each wallet and just change each wallet's ip ?
I changed 2 values # Hosts from which to allow http/json API requests, if enabled. nxt.allowedBotHosts=0.0.0.0; * and # Host interface on which to listen for http/json API request, default localhost only. # Set to 0.0.0.0 to allow the API server to accept requests from all network interfaces. nxt.apiServerHost=0.0.0.0 At least one is really necessary ^^ mining with 3 clients vs one wallet. \ must change to 0.0.0.0? or use the ip of my computer, it was 127.0.0.1 . is it need to be delete? thanks 127.0.0.1 isn't the ip of your computer, if you only got a few machines add them by hand seperated by ; I just lazy-changed it to 0.0.0.0 to accept connections from every client on the network. still can't work,,,,if i chose to open each wallet in each computer with the same account , will it have some problem? Why would you open the wallet on each computer? You just mine on the others or put the wallet ip into your browser, won't work with 127.0.0.1 anymore.
|
|
|
hi,dev, i have change the nexdefault.propertity, other computer still can't connect to the wallet, is it the same as i just open each wallet and just change each wallet's ip ?
I changed 2 values # Hosts from which to allow http/json API requests, if enabled. nxt.allowedBotHosts=0.0.0.0; * and # Host interface on which to listen for http/json API request, default localhost only. # Set to 0.0.0.0 to allow the API server to accept requests from all network interfaces. nxt.apiServerHost=0.0.0.0 At least one is really necessary ^^ mining with 3 clients vs one wallet. \ must change to 0.0.0.0? or use the ip of my computer, it was 127.0.0.1 . is it need to be delete? thanks 127.0.0.1 isn't the ip of your computer, if you only got a few machines add them by hand seperated by ; I just lazy-changed it to 0.0.0.0 to accept connections from every client on the network.
|
|
|
It should reread the plot on every block afaik.
|
|
|
hi,dev, i have change the nexdefault.propertity, other computer still can't connect to the wallet, is it the same as i just open each wallet and just change each wallet's ip ?
I changed 2 values # Hosts from which to allow http/json API requests, if enabled. nxt.allowedBotHosts=0.0.0.0; * and # Host interface on which to listen for http/json API request, default localhost only. # Set to 0.0.0.0 to allow the API server to accept requests from all network interfaces. nxt.apiServerHost=0.0.0.0 At least one is really necessary ^^ mining with 3 clients vs one wallet.
|
|
|
Hab ja jetzt auch 8 von den Teilen rumliegen, 45€ hätte ich gerne - wer mehr als 4 nimmt bekommt den Versand gezahlt ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Hab einen getestet und der lief stabil auf 1.3x MHs, irgendwer hier hat seinen auch auf 1.5 laufen afaik, sollte also möglich sein. Sind halt von GawMiner, steht also Fury drauf, ist aber 1:1 das identische Gerät mit anderem Schriftzug. Jede Einheit besteht aus einem Miner, einem USB Kabel, dem Netzteil und dem Stromkabel - bei Bedarf kann ich gerne noch eine funktionierende cgminer Version irgendwo hoch laden inkl meiner Testbatch, damit gehts direkt ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Meiner läuft auf 230 Freq mit ~38 MHs...300 Freq dürfte nichts bringen außer Hitze und Stromverbrauch, der pendelt von 37 bis 41 MHs und 38 is so ca die 24h mitte, hab jetzt auch gelesen das die Lightning im Gegensatz zu allen andere X6 mit 1.05v laufen anstatt 1.1v - weswegen sich über 240 Freq wohl auch nicht mehr viel tut außer HW Error.
Rejected: 0.6 MH/s (1.4%) 38.2 MH/s 24-hour Average auf clevermining.
|
|
|
I think that it's rather hard to understand the technical lingo due to this being a new algorithm and all, so here's an analogy: Generating plots are like making treasure maps. It is: 1) Okay to transfer your treasure maps around because they will still contain the same information about the treasure(i.e. you can copy and paste a generated plot onto another HDD and mine from there) 2) Not useful to copy and paste the same treasure map and try to mine from both locations, because they'll all be telling you the same treasure locations (i.e. you cannot duplicate your generated plots onto different HDDs and run miners on both, both miners will be calculating the same nonces) 3) Okay to stop generating treasure maps for awhile, and continue generating from the last treasure map you've generated. (you can stop generating nonces to do other work, but when you continue, be sure to configure your run_generate.bat to start generating from the last nonce that you've generated). I'm not sure if that is helpful to you, but it was to me in trying to understand this whole PoC thing. Best of luck in mining! Only got 2 blocks here, and I've got a 256 Gb plot! ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) Very nice analogy and easy to understand, thats how i got it too.
|
|
|
Any benchmarks yet about plot size limits aka what can you pc scan within 2000 seconds? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) it should be within 240 seconds to be exact, based on OP post of blocktime is 4 minutes Okay so SSD Read speed id around 500 mb/s -> 120 gb? i am updated my post, you dont need to read whole plot data each block, its only on relevant scoop, based on previous block hash So basicly more machines don't really help in mining, just speed up plot generation because block chance depends on plot size? Unless of course you reach your machines plot read limit but if it only reads 0.024% of your plot this would be around a few TB, hundreds? More size of HDD = more found block. Like in every coin invest more get more. Roger that, creation just takes time, 1tb plot needs about 24 gb of reading which is roughly the limit of a regular hdd, times 5 for ssd - have fun generating ^^
|
|
|
Any benchmarks yet about plot size limits aka what can you pc scan within 2000 seconds? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) it should be within 240 seconds to be exact, based on OP post of blocktime is 4 minutes Okay so SSD Read speed id around 500 mb/s -> 120 gb? i am updated my post, you dont need to read whole plot data each block, its only on relevant scoop, based on previous block hash So basicly more machines don't really help in mining, just speed up plot generation because block chance depends on plot size? Unless of course you reach your machines plot read limit but if it only reads 0.024% of your plot this would be around a few TB, hundreds?
|
|
|
Any benchmarks yet about plot size limits aka what can you pc scan within 2000 seconds? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) it should be within 240 seconds to be exact, based on OP post of blocktime is 4 minutes Okay so SSD Read speed id around 500 mb/s -> 120 gb?
|
|
|
Any benchmarks yet about plot size limits aka what can you pc scan within 2000 seconds? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
{"result":"deadline: 123456..."} Does anyone know how that number is assigned?
that number is a deadline in seconds, if no one has better deadline than you (block found occured before ur deadline reached), then u create the block Thanks. The lowest deadline i had was 2068, does that mean that i have no chance to find a block? (almost 6 hours of mining.) Or is the deadline random generated? Is it really seconds? Because as my previous poster said, the numbers are way too high, my lowest one being around 20k
|
|
|
evan hatte gestern schon angekündigt das RC4 montag oder dientag kommen wird. von dem her wirds wohl kein fake sein.
die frage ist eher ob der kurs darauf überhaupt positiv (oder negativ) reagieren wird? gut möglich das gar nichts passiren wird und dann aus enttäuschung 0.005 als nächstes anstehen.
Sag doch sowas nicht! ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
Generation is done now, do i ever have to run it again?
CPU usage dropped alot (at 1%), hdd usage is way down too (at 2%), run_miner.bat is running - normal? Shouldn't i have high CPU or HDD usage?
i dont think so, ur rig mostly spent idle waiting for deadline time, until next block is started, so based on my understanding, ur rig work every ~200 seconds and then do nothing Ah okay...so generating a larger plot seems like a good idea to keep it busy ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
DE is Strom halt zu teuer und darauf läufts mittlerweile hinaus ob es sich lohnt oder nicht -.-
|
|
|
Generation is done now, do i ever have to run it again?
CPU usage dropped alot (at 1%), hdd usage is way down too (at 2%), run_miner.bat is running - normal? Shouldn't i have high CPU or HDD usage?
|
|
|
I don't think this works with VM's. Has anyone got this working? I installed the wallet, sync't it, created an account etc. Then I cloned the VM, created a second instance, and then on both instances started generating plots and mining (with the same account ID). It appears that both of them find identical shares at the same time. How is this possible? It would imply that each VM is working on an identical plot, so the question is, what makes plot's unique? Are they not randomly generated?
your nonce range, each nonce is taking 256KB of ur disk, on second vm you should generate plot of next nonce, for example if first VM have nonce range 1-1000 then second VM should be 1001 - 2000 or you can have identical nonce range but different address, still on both case you need to re-generate plot Makes perfect sense thanks!! How do you determine the range? First pc i ran with address 0 400000 512 6 so at the second i have to run what? you generating with first nonce 0, then u create plot of 400000 nonce so ur range is 0-400000, u taking space 400000/4 MB = 100GB So far so good, so for the second pc i start at 400001, select my range and so on? never tried that yet, but based on my understanding thats how u increase block creation chance Cheers, the last question is, if my miner can overlap with each other, wouldn't it been wiser to start at nounces less people are using themself? Or are the random vs your address anyway?
|
|
|
I don't think this works with VM's. Has anyone got this working? I installed the wallet, sync't it, created an account etc. Then I cloned the VM, created a second instance, and then on both instances started generating plots and mining (with the same account ID). It appears that both of them find identical shares at the same time. How is this possible? It would imply that each VM is working on an identical plot, so the question is, what makes plot's unique? Are they not randomly generated?
your nonce range, each nonce is taking 256KB of ur disk, on second vm you should generate plot of next nonce, for example if first VM have nonce range 1-1000 then second VM should be 1001 - 2000 or you can have identical nonce range but different address, still on both case you need to re-generate plot Makes perfect sense thanks!! How do you determine the range? First pc i ran with address 0 400000 512 6 so at the second i have to run what? you generating with first nonce 0, then u create plot of 400000 nonce so ur range is 0-400000, u taking space 400000/4 MB = 100GB So far so good, so for the second pc i start at 400001, select my range and so on?
|
|
|
|