Over 20k transactions of spam. There is less than 5k unconfirmed transactions in the usually recommended range (or above) which is 40 or 50 satoshis/byte. It depends on the block size dude it would a confirmation before it goes to your wallet or to where you have deposit .
You have no idea what you're talking about. It doesnt need to be fixed maybe it is slow for sometimes it just because of the number of transactions that blockchain is taking . So be patient .
This isn't English. |
|
|
|
Confirms are pretty slow for me, I waited a couple hours for one transaction to be confirmed a few weeks ago.
What wallet are you using? What fee setting are you using? It is most likely that you are either: 1) Using an outdated wallet (which would provide possibly wrong fee calculation). 2) Using wrong fee settings. 3) Are creating transactions with many inputs/outputs (i.e. transactions that are bigger than usual) where your fee is not adequate. The average block size is over 990k now.
Stop taking 'measurements' based on a very short time period. That's not how you should do statistics. I would also like to know where you've seen this number (please provide a link). |
|
|
|
How many threads are you people going to open? Is it so hard to use Google? There is a huge difference between transaction speed [1] and confirmation speed [2]. [1] - Usually 1-3 seconds for reasonable transactions. [2] - 10 minutes on average. You are confused, because what you take for Bitcoin is spam. Spam can be slow.
Exactly. Don't blame the network if you don't know how to properly use it. The mempool size is 19.5 MB now.
No. That mempool size is calculated based on specific settings that the node has. If you accept all transactions you should assume that the mempool is "going towards infinity" due to spam. I paid the transaction fee which should let the transaction confirm within 1 block, it is still not confirmed after 2 hours.
Provide a transaction ID. |
|
|
|
Good. I think we understand now? Sometimes talking can work, eh?
Yes, we understand each other now. I was counting that column.  (the 41 - 50 pending column, in my 10,000. just to be clear) stated that there were >10k unconfirmed transactions with a fee of > 50 satoshi/bytes. The point that I was trying to make is that this column here:  includes transactions with a fee of < 50 satoshis/bytes (specifically 41-49) and that we can not know exactly how many are at 50 satoshi/bytes.
I've bolded the important parts. Hopefully you will understand what I wanted to say. |
|
|
|
But I don't understand what number you are now speaking of! lol.
The website shows the unconfirmed amount of TXs in a range in 1 color, and the total amount of TXs in X amount of hours (transactions which were confirmed) as a shade of blue. My 10.000 figure is correct. (now starting to go down)
Do you agree?
Are you counting the 41-50 range as well? Otherwise it makes no sense if you only count the unconfirmed transactions that have 51 satoshi/byte and above. |
|
|
|
And there are still over 10,000 transactions 50 sat/byte or more. How can you not see that?
(block just found, now down to "around 10,000")
That number represents the total amount of transactions today. We have both made another mistake, we can not look at the range 41-50 (which I initially dismissed; I'm sorry) because that range includes transactions that have < 50satoshi/byte as well, and we can't know how many represent "fee == 50 satoshis/byte". As far as >50 satoshis/byte is concerned there are ~ 2.3k unconfirmed transactions [1].
[1] - Screenshot for archival. |
|
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: Ref. spam.
|
|
|
|
Forget the spam for a minute Landa. (1 - 10 is not a recommended fee)
I'm not "Landa" and no, I'm not going to forget the spam (as my node is impacted by it). Those transactions aren't the only ones that are spam though. Screenshot the 50 sat/byte. (8700 transactions at 50)
No. You've that there are more than 10k unconfirmed transaction that have paid said 50 satoshi/byte and over, this is not the case.Now all those fee payers, who thought they had paid correctly (cos they did) are at the moment stuck in underpaying limbo.
Too bad. Newer transactions with bigger fee will take precedent, if transaction rate doesn't go down your transactions will never confirm and eventually will get drop.
Hyperbolic doomsday nonsense as always. Innovation can be happening while we kick the can down the road.
The two things are not incompatible.
As Franky always say's, You don't seem to be able to see any thing between here and infinity. Strange.
You seem to miss the vital points there. 1) HF's are not safe (not when the network has zero experience with them); 2) People will demand more. Even 2 MB block size limit is not safe without the added limitations (Gavin's BIP) due to quadratic scaling. How about we wait for Segwit and linear scaling of the time before proceeding? There should be at least (some) room for a block size increase afterwards?
Update: I was just about to create a post when I've noticed your update. I accept the apology and have used strikethrough for my previous answer to you (it can be ignored now). My point still stands.
What point? |
|
|
|
20mb of less spammy transactions.
Less spammy does not imply != spam. Lauda, you do not know that Target did not pay the correct fee.
Right now there are over 10000 transactions paying 50 sat (recommended) and over.
Only 2000 will fit in the next block, and 2000 in the block after.
What are you talking about? That is not true according to the source that I tend to use: 
There's over 40 thousand transaction paying a 1-10 satoshis/byte fee, also known as spam. |
|
|
|
BTW network is going shit again, 20 MB unconfirmed transactions: https://btc.com/Not really; stop posting nonsense. There's actually ~1.5 GB of unconfirmed spam and the network is just fine:  i still have 4 transaction waiting for confirmation.. just suck they are 4 hours ago.
Then the fee that you have included is not adequate for the transaction size.
I don't feel that much difference as my TX's usually confirm within the next block. However, it does seem like the interval has lowered a bit more on average. Maybe more hashrate has been added. |
|
|
|
I'm also asking about the JavaScript requirement
What is your question exactly? I can notify a developer to look at it. When browsing, another problem, the gray font isn't easy to see. I prefer black fonts the way they're here.
There will be multiple themes so that is not a problem. You will be able to choose the one that suits you the most. |
|
|
|
Osobno sam stavio svoj prvi sell order na 2k te ostatak BTC-a rasporedio prema gore (eksponencijalno smanjivao kolicinu) do 10k (ne mislim da ce doci tako visoko, no ako dodje, maleni dio je spreman).
Ja imam nesto na $1210, ali tvoj takoreci plan mi se svida. U svakom slucaju ako dode do bilo koje od tih cijena (nakon kojih je razumno ocekivati znatan pad) ti ces dobro proci, a ukoliko ne dode do toga ne gubis nista. I ja bih mogao isto da se postavim izmedu 2-5k. Nemam nesto posebno vremena ali pokusati cu. U najgorem slucaju cijena nece skociti kako se nadam i nakon 3-4 mjeseca cu imati zaradu od samo 100% ili 200%....
Ja ne znam koliki mi je % zarade jer sam ulozio 0. ta je, je... Ovaj čovijek u Nizozemskoj sekciji je ovo zaista predvidjao 10/5. na osnovu techničke analize:
-snip-
Sto predvida dalje? Ne zelim da prevodim pomocu prevoditelja (koji je inace grozan).
Update: Ne, nista ja nisam ulozio. Cak vremena provodim manje nego dok nisam bio pripadnik neke kampanje. |
|
|
|
It was designed to have increased block size.
No. It seems like you would rather potentially break the system or add more limitations for more potential profit (greed). However, there are even people advocating for even smaller block sizes like Luke-Jr.  But of course blockstream will save everyone from bitcoin's inherent flaws of not scaling. It's a solution to a manufactured, fake problem that they have created for themselves. And unfortunately, so many have bought into it.
That would be contradictory to their own best interest. They would stand to 'profit more' if Bitcoin was a "huge success". Absolutely false. Newbie. As I stated, now that blocks are routinely full, there is no way of knowing whether a given transaction will be confirmed until it has been.
Yet my TX's confirm within the next block 99% of the time. I wonder why that is.
Update: There's nothing 'new' about that. |
|
|
|
Minerjones it might be time to update the thread! -snip-
I'm curious: How many 5-packs are left? |
|
|
|
There's a LOT of work that still need to be done. The new forum looks terrible.. I know it's beta, but still ..
The looks don't matter that much IMO, the functionality does. Besides, that is subjective (some people will like it, and some will prefer the SMF look). I have no idea why you're telling this to a staff member. I'm on my phone 99.9% of the time and I still can't see the forum on it. I'm guessing for beta testing there won't be a mobile version? I still just get a white screen anytime I try it.
There should be a mobile version. It might be worth reporting that to the Github page. |
|
|
|
I am not agreed about the news that chinese market increasing the price of bitcoin and its indemand in chines trading exchange but there's no proof Many people are still not agreed in the news. and i believe bitcoin increased because its in demand not only chinese.. this is just because of block halving and more people are attracted to the price movement from the market.
How about you start analyzing the market and looking at all the exchanges? You will find your "proof". Why would someone believe that the general demand (interest) surged for no (apparent) reason? Also, start improving your English skills (I suggest taking a look at better use of punctuation as this was hard to read). I wouldn't be surprised if the big miners banded together from time to time to pump BTC in order to protect they're interests and operations from collapsing due to a falling BTC price... Or the halving, which cuts the miners' earn in half. Ouch.
That cuts their earning in half assuming that they sell instantly. It should not be a problem for those that can hold onto these for a while. Besides, the price is getting better for 'them'. Although you make a decent point with the possibility of the miners being a contributing factor here (although we can only speculate at this point). |
|
|
|
Zasto je ova tema ovako tiha u ovo vrijeme? Pa osjetili smo porast od preko $100 za tako malo vremena. Fale ovdje slike vlakova i tako toga (kao u Wall Observer u speculation sekciji). Ima li tko kakva ocekivanja glede cijene? Ja ovo nisam ocekivao ovako rano (tko uopce jest?). Tako da mi Bitstampovih 3% vol. ne znaci mnogo.
Nije bitan taj volumen kad ima dovoljno protoka na razmjeni. U zadnjih 24h to je gotovo 20k BTC na Bitstampu. |
|
|
|
Who hates Chinese? The original post says: 'got to love them'.
I have read that, and got the impression that it was sarcasm. Only you think negative about Chinese Luada - you thug.
No. I don't see why would they be responsible for it. Its just market sentiments before halving happens and is probably the reason price is rising.
No. The western exchanges are playing a game of catching-up again. I think there's no proof that china involve why this is happening.. just think that more people are knowing bitcoin and bitcoin is indemand..
So why are the Chinese exchanges trading at higher prices than the West? Because the West is leading the rally?  |
|
|
|
People is waking up. For now is the chinese because they feel a read need, but wait until Europe starts collapsing soon, then the dollar will follow. Everyone will go on Bitcoin for safety.
They don't "feel a real need". The yuan is possibly going to lose value, and I've even heard of potential capital controls. Bitcoin is one of the ways that they can move away from yuan. Isn't the Euro currency stable at the moment though?
Well, that depends. Another bank (in Belgium) has collapsed and another one needs cash injection. All these events are going to have side-effects. Maybe if the UK exits the European Union it will get interesting for Bitcoin over there. They have to vote soon right? I think it was this summer or something.
It will happen on 23rd of June (10 days to go). The sterling is already suffering. |
|
|
|
chinese miners are pumping btc to keep it profitable to mine a little longer and cash out before the halving
No. The Chinese investors are going into Bitcoin to escape Yuan, not to convert back after the price has reached X amount. Obviously, this isn't a stable rise and a correction is expected, but everyone is being hyperbolic about it.
This thread is pointless and possibly in the wrong section. Why do you hate the Chinese? Are you a Trump supporter? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
