It has been clearly noted that United players think they are world stars, and there is this group of players that influence others to think that they are so above everyone else to be able to play in United that they do not have to listen to anyone.

Last year this happened with Ole, they became second a year prior, and then they got too confident and Ole would give tactics and nobody would care and they would do whatever they want, and their argument was always "we became second, we are so good, even better than liverpool" and we saw how that played out last year. Hence, there is definitely a problem of not caring about the instructions for sure, no doubt.

Are they a major sponsor? Yes, but that doesn't mean that they are the main one. The "hash clash" is between two main sponsors here, sportsbet.io vs stake, and would you put the "main sponsor of Southampton" as your hash clash team, or would you put "one of the major ones in arsenal" there?

I think it's clear that the sponsorship of Southampton is the bigger one there, sure Arsenal is the better team, but because it's just a major sponsor, one of many, I think that means hash clash should definitely be Southampton vs Everton, that would make a lot more sense. If you want, you could ask them to do something about Arsenal vs Everton as well, but I would find it not appropriate when Southampton is there.

This is possible but I only don't think if this will become successful or if they will push it. Maybe this will be the same to what happened with libra coin which facebook have planned to create. You think your privacy is safe with them because they are a big company and maybe you aren't aware that they have been involved in an issue in regards to the data of the users.

Normal users can't be part of the project's team but what you mean there is that they should cooperate to what is being advised to them in order to secure their data's. Yes it's true that sometimes its the users fault because they aren't knowledgeable enough.

I doubt that Arsenal would be considered as a hash clash candidate. I mean yes it is not going to be nothing, there is a sponsorship there for sure, but the front of the jersey is the real thing. This is why I believe that we should be focusing a bit more towards Southampton and Everton. That is why I believe that we should be considering the hash clash situation. I will certainly be betting on these two games.

I still do not know which one is better, Everton may not look "great" so far but they have a lot more money and this is why there could be some transfers that could tip the scales on Everton side. If not, then Southampton would definitely win.

For now we don't see any harm of repeatedly using the same address but will we wait before something bad happens to us? I don't think he is misleading since he already state some reasons there on why it is advised to constantly change our public address right after every use however for someone that is only dealing with smaller amounts then I think they can continue using with one address.

There's nothing to be afraid of because no one will check their addresses and will be obsessed to hacked it. Hacking isn't easy so if hackers will done the act, they can just do it to the addresses that has huge balances on it as that will be worth of their time.

I think that analyzing is important if you're into much shorter terms like for example if you are a trader but for someone that is into longer terms, they can just buy and then hodl without needing to worry what can come in the next days/weeks. I don't know if what is that true bottom they are looking for when it's clear that we are now done with that phase. Right now the price have recovered and is getting stable in preparation for the bull run.

The lowest we got last time was in the range of 15-16k and that must be the bottom. I thought op warns us because of the scams happening around but it was only the price that he was going to talk about, oh well.

This doesn't look like a stake related thing though. I mean if they are making a profit from the withdrawals then it would be bad. But if they are doing fine and they do not have any type of profit then it means that they are spending it on all transaction fees. You could have cheaper ones but it could take a lot more, whereas if they do it "expensive" like this one is, then the process would be super fast and that is what matters right now.

This is why I believe that we should not be really giving any type of custom orders on about the withdrawal fee. That would just be something we couldn't agree on as a whole group, so they do what they think is the most favorite one.

I would guess that Milan wasn't "that" bad to be fair. I mean yes they were not good playing in Europe, but the way they played in Europe and the way they played in league was fair bit different. This means that they definitely played badly, but we all know that it has been quite good for the regular season and they had like 20 games in the league where they played very dominantly clearly.

Yes, Juventus played badly but Inter played very decently and they gave Milan a good run for their money as well. Depend on the transfers all teams do, I believe that next season we could end up seeing something great again, it will be hard but not impossible.

I think it is clear that you would be able to play if you have different browsers. Also this "multiple tabs" thing could mean that you would need multiple accounts, no idea if it is allowed. In that case you could do chrome, opera, firefox and whatever and you get to play on three different accounts all on the same time.

However, I still suggest that we shouldn't do any of this, just have one account and gamble only once without any trouble at all. There isn't a question of what will happen, it s going to be fine. This means that we should be focusing a bit more towards doing the right thing, and not try to find a wrong way to do something else.

There was time when England was able to have this trophy, but they fail now with current situation and their game plan it's not looking promising even bookmakers feeling good about them but still it's one of most tough condition for them to win this trophy.

And they are having some good results in Nations League, but there are other factors which are having their impact, and they are able to perform in better way right now I am also having same feeling it's not easy for them to win or even reach into last four of this competition because few other European teams have much better quality and skilled players which can do better than England and have chance of winning this trophy.

This would make a good sense to be fair. I mean Newcastle is a brand new team under new management. And even though I believe that this dirty blood money should never be sportswashed, and would always root against them and hope they relegate and never recover, I still think that Neymar individually could make the most out of it there. They are SO rich that the entire GDP of a whole nation is under their fingertips if needed, 300+ billion dollars personally and even more where that came from.

So, he could ask for literally 50+ or even 100 million and could be getting paid that much if the owner agreed. Would not make sense, but not outside of affordable space for them, hell they can pay 1 billion per year and still can afford it so it is no problem for Newcastle.

The thing is, outside of those three, there will be "some" coins that will go higher than those, but there will be 95%+ that will go higher less or not go up at all. Which means that, if you pick these three then you are guaranteed a certain amount of return, but if you pick anything that is outside of these three, then you are rolling the dice and hoping that you would get lucky. Could you? Well the possibility is there and what you invest into could end up being something profitable for you.

But that is not going to be guaranteed thing, and you could end up losing it all. Why would you prefer to do something that would risk it all? Isn't it better to invest into something that is much more decent for you?

Now day by day life is going to be tough for these cricketers because too many franchise leagues are operating so just because of this try-series idea is completely failure and no one going to try this in future with just we can expect some try series in T-20 which is also coming in New Zealand. With this all now I am strongly in favor of stopping this ODI and just concentrating on test matches and T-20 because this could be more beneficial and having more entertainment for all viewers around the glob and ICC can bring more money with this all as well.

As we all know in South Asia we have only one event, and it's mostly postponed due to India, Pakistan rivalry, so now it's time for them to change this into T-20 and mostly play in the UAE, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka because these three venues are acceptable for all parties even they have no profit like India and Pakistan, but we can expect regular cups without any problem.

I would guess that they would, everyone would really except a few. The reason why there is nobody that really shares it is the fact that they do not know it, everyone just assumes and sometimes they are right and sometimes they are wrong.

I could say that we already saw the bottom and it won't go up anymore and that was it, and if that really happens and we do not go below that anymore and it just goes up, doesn't mean that I am some genius or anything, it just means my assumption was right but it was still an assumption and nothing more. This is why I honestly believe that the best thing we could do is move on from trying to find it, and just deal with our predictions.

All sites that has a list of restricted countries has a zero respect for vpn's because they know that it's a kind of tool to bypass those restrictions although they don't want this to happen and for them they also like it if they can get more costumers from different countries but what cant they do? They are only following the orders from the higher authorities because I think having a country restriction has something to do with the licenses they have, or the casino being regulated by the governments.

Same thing with the kyc but aside from the protection of the minors, that kyc can do, it also allows the gamblers to feel confident in case there are scamming/hacking have happened since criminals can now be tracked easily.

Well, to be fair that is why they have Luka Jovic. Not that he played much, but he played in 15 La Liga games and he had even 3 UCL games as well. For a total of 550 minutes though, so not a lot of minutes. In the end he is not there for the future of Real Madrid and their "next big thing", he is just a bench player that would replace Benzema in case of an injury, or just if he is tired or something.

Other than that, they still do need a young player who would replace Benzema in the future when Benzema retires or just not good enough. It would be quite high price to get a player like that, so I sort of understand why they are not doing that, it would be taking tens of millions of dollars to get a generational talent at young age.

Robert Lewandowski is currently talk of transfer town because suddenly U-Turn from Bayern Munich about his move is having big impact on him and his rest of career with we all know he announces few months back he wants to leave Germany for some other destination and all things were on target with Bayern Munich already have few good strikers in their squad for possible replacement but suddenly now they are not allowing him to leave for Barcelona is big setback for him and his mentality which can have negative impact, and surely it's going to hurt his current club as well.

Now the best option is taken 50 Million and give him permit for leaving because this can bring some good gesture for all three parties.

You just said earlier that all platforms are included. This could be better than the normal exclusion system where one site is only covered but it's still up to gamblers if they will do this. I think they will think many times and maybe they will not do it all since they know that they can not play gambling ever again.

It's also hard to completely stop your addiction in one go and this could cause a bad effect to your mind and physical health but would it be better if it's done slowly or step by step. For the countries that allows vpn, didn't they have any country restrictions? Because, I think it doesn't make sense if they have it and then they will just allow vpn for someone to bypass it.

Btc and eth is known as the safe coins of crypto but he didn't got carried away and invest more while there are some people who invest recklessly using the money they cant afford to lose in a random coin. If only they did that to eth and btc, that high risk can turn out to be a high profit.

Sometimes acting like you didn't have any investment is great because the moment you return and see your wallet/accounts, it gives you a good feeling that you have earned something. The op is down by 55 percent, I think most of it are from eth since the coin dropped a lot compared to btc but like you said, he shouldn't worry as this is normal and just part of the game.

Well, if you are a person that sees gambling as a source of income then you shouldn't rush and play but you must think first about its consequences but if you are only playing to get entertained then you can just gamble right away since you can stop easily after you lose your small balance.

I only cant agree on some of the items in your list like on number 1. A pro gambler actually plays for profit and not for fun. Also in number 3. What if the game has a potential of a million multiplier? Games like mines and limbo. Will you embrace it and predict till you hit them? I think that was too risky already since the chance for them to came out is very low.