This is the whole mosque at ground zero debate all over again. The only reason it is being given mainstream coverage is because they are attempting to get people behind the war via peoples outrage in having an enemy front on US soil. This is another example of the US government allowing its people to be affronted and attacked in order to push thru a radical globalist agenda.
it's not, the ground zero mosque is protected by the first amendment. The Libyan rebels should not be setting up an embassy until they take control of the country. My point was not to make claims of legitimacy or illegitimacy of any of the arguments, but to point out the fact that the argument itself is being brought to mainstream attention in order to serve the purpose of sewing division, much like the ground zero mosque issue was. |
|
|
|
|
Finally some intelligent deconstruction of this FUD.
|
|
|
|
|
Only 1 mad scientist left!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I am also wondering the same thing. I have one of these but don't have a controller. If there is a control mechanism included I might buy it just for that.
|
|
|
|
|
This is the whole mosque at ground zero debate all over again. The only reason it is being given mainstream coverage is because they are attempting to get people behind the war via peoples outrage in having an enemy front on US soil. This is another example of the US government allowing its people to be affronted and attacked in order to push thru a radical globalist agenda.
|
|
|
|
Closing an account you don't use is going to hurt them good. It's intelligent to keep your options limited.  This is why sarcasm font is needed. Best idea EVER |
|
|
|
Yes, the globe is heating, but will it have significant impact to our lives? That I find debatable at best. There is far more evidence that this recent temperature increase is a result of solar cycles than human activity. Speaking of evidence, I am still waiting on some documentation, but I fully expect you to provide none and proceed with endlessly deconstructing statements as you have done so far. You are claiming there needs to be a change after all, therefore the burden of proof is on YOU regardless of how much consensus you claim there is. Interesting related article: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/opinion/green-agenda-has-parallels-with-excesses-of-communism/story-e6frfhqf-1226103023674 |
|
|
|
|
Why pay cash for your stamps when you could be paying bitcoin!?
|
|
|
|
|
These signs have been more popular than I had imagined! i sold 8 just today! Don't worry tho I have plenty more. PM me to order!
|
|
|
|
Do they ever really need a reason to be pissed off about something?  |
|
|
|
|
LOL thanks - you are the first to recognize Al so far. Chicagoland is my home turf so I thought it was fitting until I get around to making a logo ;P
|
|
|
|
I am offering vintage Vietnam era landmine warning signs for  each, shipping included. Litecoin equivalent also accepted. I offer discounts if you buy 3 or more in one order. US only please. They are about 11 inches wide across the top, and made of enameled metal. I expect payment upfront, please see my rep in the honest trader thread http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=484.0 , my steam games thread http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=12119.0 and my trust ratings. PM me to order.  |
|
|
|
|
Sorry, I am not going to waste time discussing endless peripheral issues which could be symptoms of any number of causes. Lets get right to the dependent factor of all of these side topics. Does human production of carbon-dioxide significantly raise global temperature? All of your assumptions rest on this one answer. You say yes, I say no. So far I have seen others here provide you with references - but I haven't yet once seen you provide documentation. It is easy to sit on the side and demand others produce evidence, then deconstruct it endlessly. Why don't you declare some of this evidence you claim you have?
|
|
|
|
|
I have a bunch of notes from Russia and Africa I think. Ill dig them up and get back to you with pics. Do you collect coins too or just bills? I have a bunch of coins from all over aswell.
|
|
|
|
I wasn't aware that facts become less valid if they aren't brand new news. I also don't know if I would call The new York Times a "conspiracy rag". Your "current consensus" is an illusion parroted all over the media without factual basis. I mean my god man, you are quoting Al Gore's talking points word for word. Ever try thinking for yourself?
I don't really care that much for Al Gore, nor do I ever seek him out to listen to or read. Tell me, do you ever immerse yourself into the scientific community, it's journals, etc.? Or do you just selectively seek your news from media which is largely supported by those who support the Republican party, such as Fox news?Your 'facts' which you claim do not become less valid, were never facts, but big corporations spreading misinformation and capitalizing on some missteps made by a fraction of scientists, who felt compelled to polish the numbers of some studies, because of their frustration in being up against big corporate money.
You have two choices: follow the scientific community, and what they're saying, or big money, which is obviously motivated by the concept of making money.
Take your blinders off, and try and be critical of your idea about global warming, because only about 10 percent in the scientific community actually interpret the data somewhat in line with how you do. Notably, a large percentage of scientists who are petroleum geologists. Hmm, imagine that. It's amazing how much misinformation can be spread by corporations who have a huge amount of money at stake. However, it doesn't take a brilliant mind to realize that. I think some people just have a difficult time weeding out the garbage from legitimate material. It helps if you take an active interest in the subject, rather than following your nose in response to seeking out questionable material that dovetails with your political agenda. I wouldn't be surprised if you're one of those who fell for the argument that melting ice won't cause sea levels to rise. I took the liberty of putting your logical fallacies in bold so others can learn from your assumptions. So far you have asked for evidence, the when provided with a reputable source, denied it existed, made sweeping generalizations & assumptions about me personally, as well as the scientific community, and attacked me personally rather than the evidence produced. It doesn't take a brilliant mind to see you are presenting emotional motivation as evidence rather than facts. Interesting related article: http://www.truthwinds.com/siterun_data/environment/weather_and_climate/news.php?q=1311700951 |
|
|
|
|
Had my first order today! They took advantage of the 10 free moringa seeds with any purchase from any of my threads (this week only). Get something while its still available!
|
|
|
|
I wonder though, how much of the information presented there is information that was shown to be falsified in Climategate.
Climategate is old news. Seriously. For the scientific community, it's business as usual, which means that research continues as it has. If you want to post recent material that isn't from a conspiracy rag that clearly shows that the current consensus on Global Warming is highly questionable, then please do so. I wasn't aware that facts become less valid if they aren't brand new news. I also don't know if I would call The new York Times a "conspiracy rag". Your "current consensus" is an illusion parroted all over the media without factual basis. I mean my god man, you are quoting Al Gore's talking points word for word. Ever try thinking for yourself? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
