Order book depth; 1 issue with the order book depth is the more depth you ask to show (5% vs 1%)... it makes the chart have a lower range of height between candles... when watching on the 1min... on 1% order book depth it looks fine.. but on 5% order book depth the chart looks flat. The other thing was, ordering on the top; we have 'Stamp / BTC-e / Finex / Huobi . . .' but actually Finex does more volume, has lower fees and margin trading, so all over a better product. Same with okcoin ~ Okcoin have a way more sophisticated product with advanced algorithmic trading.. maybe it should be ~ Bitfinex / Bitstamp / BTC-e / OKCoin / Huobi ~ and drop the LTC When it comes to bitcoin exchanges, we want to be promoting and endorsing the very best the market has to offer, both technically and financially, and these are things like OKCoin, Kraken, Bitfinex.. . Bitstamp has the worst UI ever, spend all their time on KNY regulation bumming and I just feel we should be making more of an effort to promote good players in the market, not players like bistamp who's site has a poor UI and generally no technical advancement since their inception at all. Because of margin trading, Bitfinex is much smaller than it looks like. and it will cause some misleading. Current traffic: Bitstamp 10 BTC-e BTC/USD 7.6 Bitfinex 2.5, (1.6 when not listed at top, 1 in May) Huobi 5 BTC-e LTC/USD 5 BTC-e LTC/BTC 1.7 when not listed at top (2.5 when listed at top, 2.2 in May) Generally speaking, BTC-e LTC/BTC should not be replaced by Bitfinex. but I received a lot of requests in Twitter to add Bitfinex to top, and there was 3 USD exchanges listed before Mt.Gox closed down. Also the weekly alexa of Bitfinex(54595) is much less than Bitstamp(12792). Alexa is not accurate, but it has reference value to check which exchange is larger.
|
|
|
Thank you. We use Blockchain service to handle the payment. It seems they have some trouble and didn't notify the transaction in time. Now the premium is extended. Sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|
|
The price dropped too quickly and trigger the anti-glitch mechanism. The trades is the same as cryptsy site, so it is still working.
|
|
|
Thanks for a huge update! Any plans to add more exchanges, particularly hitbtc? Sometimes I do arbitrage. For this purpose I use btc-e, bitstamp and hitbtc exchanges. But hitbtc' absence makes arbitrage more difficult.
hitBTC's trades is abnormal obviously, so it would not be supported. I have not noticed any abnormal activity on hitbtc while trading. Its trading volume and history seems legit. Here is an article about it that on Reddit http://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/25mpbf/hitbtcs_volume_is_very_suspicious/
|
|
|
Hi, it is me again...
I already wrote some time ago that Bitstamp's transaction log (the lower right sub-window) usually has a dozen or so entries out of order every hour,
This problem occurs only with Bitstamp, not with BTC-e, Bitfinex, Huobi, or OKCoin. You explained that it is some technical problem on their side, having to do with them using separate computers or databases forAPI trades and manual trades. (Did I understand correctly?)
Bitstamp doesn't contain trade type info, so there is different when the first load and updating in realtime. The trade type is guessed base on previous price when initialize. In realtime it is base on current price and orderbook. Also there is no timestamp in realtime, it's simple set as server time when receive the trade. so it is different with initialize data which is always use the true timestamp. Thanks for the explanation. But why would that affect the prices and amounts so much? E.g.in the second transaction below [ ... ] 2014-06-27 02:43:56 | 582.61 | 0.10367 --> 2014-06-27 02:43:56 | 582.61 | 0.10367 2014-06-27 02:43:59 | 582.67 | 0.03466 --> 2014-06-27 02:44:00 | 582.72 | 0.30400 2014-06-27 02:44:04 | 582.77 | 0.24398 --> 2014-06-27 02:44:04 | 582.77 | 0.24398 [ ... ] Is is possible for a transaction to be displaced by several minutes when the log is reordered by timestamp? I think it is not needed. It is bitstamp only issue, and doesn't have good solution. because the trade type is missed, reorder only won't solve the issue and will make the code more complex and decrease the charts performance. Several seconds unexpected offset is not big problem.
|
|
|
Is there a bug? With chrome every time I remove my lines or retracements, I can't add new ones, I have to restart the entire browser to be able to use these tools again, even a new tab doesn't fix it?
I cannot reproduce the issue. Is there any error message in console?
|
|
|
i have a suggestion.
For alarm setting, why not automatically draw a line across the chart based on the value of alarm set ? The line will enable user to know and represent once it's hit i am out (take profit) or i am in (buy order fill). I believe people set alarm to represent their buy order or sell order. A line across the chart which represent the value set on alarm will visually help user to see clearly the value they have set on the alarm.
I'm afraid it could not be improved. Current design is minimize the affact on the main chart and keep the main chart clearly.
|
|
|
Hi, it is me again...
I already wrote some time ago that Bitstamp's transaction log (the lower right sub-window) usually has a dozen or so entries out of order every hour,
This problem occurs only with Bitstamp, not with BTC-e, Bitfinex, Huobi, or OKCoin. You explained that it is some technical problem on their side, having to do with them using separate computers or databases forAPI trades and manual trades. (Did I understand correctly?)
Bitstamp doesn't contain trade type info, so there is different when the first load and updating in realtime. The trade type is guessed base on previous price when initialize. In realtime it is base on current price and orderbook. Also there is no timestamp in realtime, it's simple set as server time when receive the trade. so it is different with initialize data which is always use the true timestamp.
|
|
|
i have been using bitcoinwisdom for many months now and i like it very much. If the premium account can offer more benefits , i will pay for it , 1 whole year to show my support for the site.
Of course. We will try our best.
|
|
|
Thanks for a huge update! Any plans to add more exchanges, particularly hitbtc? Sometimes I do arbitrage. For this purpose I use btc-e, bitstamp and hitbtc exchanges. But hitbtc' absence makes arbitrage more difficult.
hitBTC's trades is abnormal obviously, so it would not be supported.
|
|
|
hi op
you have just removed bc chart and replaced it with cloack chart. can you please add other mintpal charts? bc , rzr and others? coingy.com have started their TI service and have a full mintpal and other exchanges charts.. but your site is better and would be even greater if you will add extra charts.
thanks.
Now the list of Mintpal in 'Markets' is automatic base on 7 days volume. All supported altcoin could be found in homepage https://bitcoinwisdom.com
|
|
|
Absolutely great charts !!!!
The XC/BTC is missing the first few days from Mintpal. Can you get this added?
Many thanks.
I'm sorry, MintPal doesn't provide full historical data.
|
|
|
Dear Bitcoinwisdom, please add a cryptsy/vrcbtc chart when possible, desperately needed. Thank you.
Cryptsy's API is still broken often. So it could not be supported.
|
|
|
@BitCoinWisdom
It's starting to look like Mintpal is the major exchange for altcoins (other than LTC). I noticed they're already added as an exchange.
Could you consider adding Mintpal's top 5 currencies by volume, whatever they are at a time, and update that list, say once a month or so? Altcoin volume changes quickly, and you probably don't want to list all of their currencies, but the 5 or so biggest currencies on the perhaps biggest altcoin exchange seems reasonable, no?
Now top 4 currencies by volume of 7 days are listed.
|
|
|
Hey guys, I'm having trouble seeing your charts in google chrome on my laptop. This is the only device that is having the issue. I can see the red and green bid/ask lines, as well as the two right columns with bid/ask data and lastest trades. I tried clearing cookies and nothing changed. The site works fine in IE, which I despise.
Any hints? What do you use to chart the data ?
Thanks,
Chrome is one of the mainly supported browser. Is there any error in console?
|
|
|
The cavirtex BTCCAD charts https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/cavirtex/btccadshow many large upward spikes that I believe are not real trades. For example, the chart shows a trade at around 6am UTC June 20 for 681.43, but the cavirtex API data available at https://cavirtex.com/api2/trades.json?currencypair=BTCCADhas no such trade listed. And there are similar spikes all over the place, sometimes 3 or 4 a day. I also checked other charts for cavirtex, and they don't show these spikes. Is there a glitch in the way the data is retrieved for cavirtex? Because Cavirtex API 2 is not stable. if you run the API several times. Sometimes it returns "fields: ..." and sometimes returns "orders: ...". So I still uses API 1. and just check the tid 191664 which is 681.43 in our database in returns of API https://www.cavirtex.com/api/CAD/trades.json, The price is 649. So it must be temporary issue of their API.
|
|
|
What is the deal with Huobi's charts and value?
Huobi's charts, only, have been lagging increasingly over the last day; now they are 14 hours (!) out of date. It must be a problem with their chart data server. Some hours ago I checked the chart on their own website and it was up-to-date. Indeed itheir price tracked the OKCoin price very closely through some large swings, only a few CNY above or below. If the "updated" goes zero means server receive the data from exchange's API successfully. No care the API keep sending old data or not.
|
|
|
I don't trust OKCoin either. The bid ratio distribution never goes right. If their system doesn't have flaw, it must be contain fake trades.
You are aware that the order book shown on bitcoinwisdom and other chart sites is truncated, right? You cannot get the bid/ask ratio rfom that. It's trade type instead of orderbook. OKCoin provide full historical trades, so no data is missed.
|
|
|
A little hurried no? Let's see first what the guy will do at OKCoin. He may work on a new overseas BTC/CNH exchange, for example. Or stop bitcoin and litecoin trading at OKCoin, and turn it into a Dogecoin-only site. Huobi still seems to have the "cleanest" BTC/CNY chart, with a tight spread and volume that changes as expected according to the local time and holidays. OKCoin has a steady ~10% bachround volume, 24/7, that may be fake trade. EDIT: seriously, every exchange may be using fake trades to boost their volume or manipulate the price; and every exchange may be trading against its clients, with obvious unfair advantages, or doing other unethical things. Methinks that bitcoinwisdom should not give much thought about those issues; its best interest should be to provide whatever its users want. I don't trust OKCoin either. The bid ratio distribution never goes right. If their system doesn't have flaw, it must be contain fake trades.
|
|
|
When I scroll with my mouse wheel, it zooms in and out of the chart.
Is there any way that we can shift-scroll or ctrl-scroll to pan left and right?
The zoom in/out is always base on the rightmost candlestick. Use Drag and Drop to move the charts. I understand this. Is there any way that we can hold down a key and use the mouse wheel to move the charts left and right? Also, is there any way to preserve where I've moved the chart when I scroll in or out? i.e. if I move the chart to the right a few hours into blank space, can you keep the chart where it is when you zoom in and out? Use mousewheel to scrolling is some covenience than drag and drop. but after combine with other hand, it has no advantage anymore. so it won't be supported. Preserve the position was implemented very first, and to make sure "auto scrolling" always work as expected, it was replaced by current zoom in/out function. The two function is too similar and have different user experience, implement both will confuse user, so it won't be added too.
|
|
|
|