I think different countries only have reservations about cryptocurrencies and their reasoning behind it is just fair. For example, the transactions are public but the anonimity is assured. It means that it can be used for illegal activities and the government can't tax it. But in the end of the day, they can't stop cryptocurrency having the choice to regulate it.

My brother has this same experience and told me that most of the bounties before are less risky and will actually pay you a good amount of money and some of them are worth holding for the future. But now, the bounties are getting risky and there is a less chance that you're gonna get paid that is why searching for the right bounty takes time now.

This VIP status for the hacked accounts of the people is like a compensation for them. As a top exchange site, this is a good thing so they can still get some customers involved. But still, it is a private information and the benefits must be more (if they are not going to get much).

The two cryptocurrencies are compared but I don't think each of them can really affect the other one. There are new coins that are always being compared to bitcoin and Libra is just one of them. Libra has a different structure and it requires different regulations. It is going to be an equity-backed asset which is going to be good for this project and also stable coins minimizes volatility. Bitcoin as we know is different from this this aspects.

No, if you are a poor person, that does not mean you are stupid or something. There are people who were able to finish their degrees but still does not get a good pay because of greedy people and there are people that does not get any opportunities to have a job. People in the upper bracket should change that way of thinking.

The fact that are really pushing for a good team of blockchain professionals like blockchain engineers and engineer leads, director for product development, and innovation. Vice president for product management and director of product management for cryptocurrency and wallets means they are serious about this thing and does not want to fail. I really hope that they do well since mastercard has been in the banking industry for years and they may convince more to accept cryptocurrency.

There are articles now that says that bitcoin's energy consumption isn't that bad. And at the present day, people are on the trend of mining in the places where there is cheap electricity, low carbon resource, and the availability of a strong hydropower. But like in China where 60% of the countries' power is from coal, it is going to be an issue and the carbon footprint produced from it as well.

I think these newbies are actually misguided or they are just trolling people here. If you're gonna make a wallet, MEW always tell you that you should not reveal important files or things that may harm your wallet. Or they simply not read this things and just clicked on the okay button.

If there is any altcoin that is going to surpass bitcoin, then they have to do more and that might even take years. Ethereum is the one who is the closest to it since it just got released last 2015 but already knows how to play around this market.

Both gives a high reward but forex trading is risky compared to cryptocurrency trading and just holding the coin. There are a lot of options in crypto trading and the conmpetition in forex is just too big if you're a beginner.

Nope. Even the rich people does not know when the bottom will happen. And it does not mean that they are centralized coins, they are bad. There are coins in the top 20 before that does not belong in the top 20 now.

I think doing bitcoin related things might have given an edge to these people who have a bad intention. Same thing, bitcoin is not bad but it is just base on how we use it. Even though transactions are made public, trying to catch these people will still be hard.

If we are going to compare it to the bounces before, I don't think it is enough. But overall, this is still a good sign that a bull for XRP might happen. We don't have to worry if it's convincing enough or not.

To be honest, I haven't really got the experience of being able to get decent money two straight times. Even though I am doing research, some things just don't go their way or your way. It is really indeed unpredictable even from the moment you joined the bounty.

Reading from the comments about this topic, in the end of the day it's a mistake by the ICO devs in doing business. Because the bounty hunters does not have any control on what should be the next moves to be done in the project.

If I have $2000, I would spread my funds in the top 10 coins that are available in the market. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and XRP are not options since they should belong in the $2000.

It's probably because the project failed to do or keep their promises to their investors. It's more on they are complaining on the people who takes charge of the IEOs or projects. Well, it's not just that there are a lot of fraud projects but sometimes bad things happen to promising projects too.

There are advantages and disadvantages of doing a KYC. But as long as the project is authentic and won't play around my information, I think I could submit it. It is for security purposes and to avoid scammers and people who cheat on bounty campaigns.

I checked our constitution if there's anything that could make banning a bitcoin law possible and there is none too. Banning bitcoin here seems unconstitutional since it won't affect any citizen's interest and won't affect any bad thing in the country.

I never tried joining in a mining company before. I looked at it but it has some bad reviews and they recommend me to stick on investing in bitcoin or good altcoins.