Hi Dstm, any performance improvements are planned in next release ?

confirm, unstable on windows 10 x64, was tested on 4 different rigs, after sometime i have a lot of rejected shares (around 10% of total).

Was tested on 1080Ti and 1060 6 Gb  (8 gpu in rigs).

What faster Bminer 5.0 or DSTM 0.5.8 ? Someone make compare with data from pool ?

I guess with multiple connection my hashrate and amount of share was bigger than now. Could you add option in 0.5.9 which allow multiple connection or single connection.

I guess ZCL will like price BTG / BTCD around 200-300 $

At this point i'm not selling my $ZCL

I never hear a single word about #BitcoinGold ($282) and #BitcoinDark ($312)

I don't see why #BitcoinPrivate can't launch at least triple digits if not a similar price as those 2

Privacy + Bitcoin brand name =🤑

Good afternoon, I have a question. Why do the numbers in the window of the miner do not match the figures on the pool? You are cheating?

While the fork wasn’t ready by Christmas eve, development is currently under progress and the date for the snapshot will likely be near mid January or the end of January.

https://medium.com/chain-intelligence/the-resurgence-of-zcl-and-an-upcoming-hardfork-3ba65de3cf21

heyrhett commented 4 hours ago •  edited
Great, so a little more details about how I think we should do this

We announce a Bitcoin snapshot date (allow people time to move coins to private non-segwit wallets)
We take the snapshot at the given date
Create fork that reduces difficulty at block X and adds 1000 coinbase inputs per block for 65,000 blocks (65M total addresses).
Have a small set of miners mine with this code. It will require a large input file from the Bitcoin Snapshot.
Create a new version that simply uses a checkpoint at a given block height, and no longer requires the bitcoin Snapshot. This is a soft fork that simply removes the need to mine with the large file. It should not violate consensus.
Miners download the updated version that uses a checkpoint and no Bitcoin UTXO set.
We monitor the network and tell exchanges and everyone else when it is safe to enable the live Bitcoin Private wallets.

I hope ZM dev working of optimisation for more performance improve ))

I use this shit IE11 because it does not have GPU acceleration, other browsers use video cards and interfere with production.

Please add in the window of the miner information about the average values and temperature of the video cards, the current consumption in watts, UPTIME timer.

In Internet Explorer 11 doesn't show telemetry parameters, only form of page. Could you fix please?

dstm, if you need access to 1080ti or 1080 we could give it to you via teamviewer, may be it will help boost a bit their performance.

Which pool are you using? Suprnova ?

I found what on 0.5.7 Suprnova pool significantly increases the difficulty and my share rate (and hashrate) drop on 20 %.

I understood it for the first time, but thanks for the clarification. in practice it also works, will not the earnings decrease? That's for sure? Thank you

So does 0.5.7 earn no less than 0.5.6? That's for sure? I did not understand why the algorithm changed, which establishes the complexity of the pool?

v0.5.7
A significant decrease in the accepted share on the pool. The numbers in the program window are large, but on the pool it is 20-30% lower than usual.

CPU load still hight when in system more than 4 gpu.
For example with 8 gpus G3900 load on 80%. (On EWBF was around 20-30% with same config).

I hope next version will be with GPUS optimisation for more sol/s.
Tnx for working.

I got same error time to time on BTG.

awaiting 1080 and 1080ti optimisation

Tnx for 1060.