 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
|
|
For some reason it is marking some of my pools as dead, whereas the regular sgminer 4.2.1 does not. Is the logic to detect a dead pool different in this build?
|
|
|
|
Approx half the hashrate has moved on to scrypt-n on waffle
 scrypt Hashrate: 15.24 GH/s Miners: 3234 Mining: dogecoin Time: 19:08:49
nscrypt Hashrate: 58.31 MH/s Miners: 91 Mining: execoinNot anywhere close to half. Every wafflepool hash drops significantly, it is due to sfire going somewhere else. |
|
|
|
It looks like the API for the site doesn't pick up scrypt-n miners. My user stats page is showing (1D6Adb2Ce4LFkQXiVojv9phM7WoBiQAkcv) but if I try the api command for my user ( http://coinsolver.com/api.php?getaccountinfo=1D6Adb2Ce4LFkQXiVojv9phM7WoBiQAkcv) it responds "No Account Found" Also, any chance you can update the API for getaccountinfo to also show the following: Immature Unexchanged Combined Balance BTC balance Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
There was a guy/group, sfire, that used to mine on middlecoin, and now flips between clevermining, wafflepool, and ghash.io. If you look through the middlecoin or wafflepool threads, you can see them talk about him from time to time.
He controls somewhere in the ballpark of 25GHs mining power.
|
|
|
|
|
Any chance of adding in an API to access our user stats? I did some searching, and it doesn't look like there is one currently available.
|
|
|
|
So should we now set no submit stale shares in cgminer? I think previously (or at least at MC) we were told to NOT set this.
You should leave it submitting stale shares (same as MC). The reason for this is that cgminer doesn't know the difference between a stale share due to new block on the same chain (rejected on our end now), and a stale share due to coin chain change (accepted on our end - same as before). If you let it submit, you'll get _some_ (a small percent) still accepted, even though cgminer thinks it would be rejected. Thanks for the quick response! |
|
|
|
|
So should we now set no submit stale shares in cgminer? I think previously (or at least at MC) we were told to NOT set this.
|
|
|
|
|
So PW, it's been 48 hours over at ghash.io, have you ben able to withdrawal the LTC earnings from when we were proxied yet? Any word on how well we did?
|
|
|
|
So for now, we're back to normal mining. I'll keep my eye on it here and there and see if it bumps to 2x, but I'm guessing its unlikely  Quick question. The stats and recently found blocks on the main WafflePool site do not include the ghash.io work, correct? Do we know when we will see that? Do you have a rough approximation of number of blocks we found, and what they payout might be per 1MH/s? |
|
|
|
Waffle pool stats are bullshit  Make your own then, like me. Nothing fancy just an excel table. After every payout I write the data in my table. It calculates the BTC/MH/day value for my real hash rate and draws a nice graph too. Yeh, right, somthing like this: <img removed> And you will see how real profit is low.. Assuming I am calculating correctly, here is mine: Pretty the same, but a bit higher.. Which diff do you mine on? 512 or 1024? I do 1024 I do 512. Also, I'm in Cali, so pretty close to the west coast servers. My rejects are low (generally between 0.5% - 0.75%). |
|
|
|
Waffle pool stats are bullshit Make your own then, like me. Nothing fancy just an excel table. After every payout I write the data in my table. It calculates the BTC/MH/day value for my real hash rate and draws a nice graph too. Yeh, right, somthing like this: <img removed> And you will see how real profit is low.. Assuming I am calculating correctly, here is mine:  |
|
|
|
|
Any chance you can add in display of the WU as well as hash rate?
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone with BAMT up let me know the contents of their /etc/apt/sources.list file? I was modifying mine to try and get something else working, and can't install this as it can't find dependencies.
Edit: Nevermind, I just extracted the file from a base install of BAMT. I got this up and running now.
|
|
|
|
I was going to post in the already present OS X miner thread, but realized i'm tagged as a newb... Basically I wanted to confirm what robin1979 ( http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=12360.msg219345#msg219345) had found, that Mac OS X Lion (10.7) does indeed speed up mining for OS X users. My Mac Pro with ATI Radeon HD 5770 in 10.6.7: ~103 MHash/s My Mac Pro with ATI Radeon HD 5770 in 10.7 DP4: ~153 MHash/s Note that in 10.6.7 I was using poclbm (-w 256 .... -v caused a massive slow down on this card). In 10.7 DP4, I was having issues getting it to compile and build (weird make errors, and haven't spent any time researching). So under 10.7, I was using Diablo. I know...not a perfect comparison, but at least us OS X users have something to look forward to in a month or so! |
|
|
|
|
I've just stumbled upon this bitcoin thing, so lets see if I created this right:
1JfPbs97uzrJPDaC7414XvmYwz6p9yKgKM
|
|
|
|
|
