In my opinion, investing in DeFi projects that have their own stablecoin can be both safe and risky. It ultimately depends on the specific project and its track record.
So, some stablecoins have been successful, there have also been instances of issues with their peg to the dollar. I personally believe that having a stablecoin can be a positive aspect for a DeFi project, as it provides stability and predictability for investors.
The fact that the project has its own stablecoin does not mean that this is a 100% guarantee of success. That's not the point at all. A positive factor is that the team that presents the project has extensive experience in business development, in particular, here it is an investment. |
|
|
|
|
It will be a great project if everything they talk about really comes true and all the plans work out. It’s just that many projects appear that, on the wave of this hype, are trying to provide some kind of good projects, but basically this does not lead anywhere, but is shown at such a level as if everything is already ready. But in fact, this is just an ordinary trailer created to be shown on social networks. But the idea is really good and whoever gets it, it will be a great breakthrough.
|
|
|
|
I have decided I have too many altcoins in my portfolio and want to convert up to half of them into Bitcoin but I am waiting for the next pump like we saw in January to do this as don't want to convert while my altcoins are 20% down.
I have only been in crypto last 12 months so not that experienced when it comes to understanding cycles. Do we have any idea when the next altcoin season is due?
If you have a lot of altcoins in your Metamask wallet, then I can advise you to find and read information about the future airdrop from the wallet. On Twitter, they are dispersing the information that Metamask will make a snapshot on March 31st. I can't say what the airdrop will be exactly, but now I'm looking for all the information about it and if you find something new on this topic, write here. |
|
|
|
providing a wallet address is the same as you providing a bank account number. is it troublesome? I think it's not difficult  Viewing crypto transaction history is not much different from viewing transaction history in a bank account. This is very easy  all you need to do is a little learning and trying! I think a good option for this domain name. Users will only select the network in which payment is made. Well, accordingly, you must choose in which cryptocurrency you will accept payments. |
|
|
|
|
Sometimes I use this platform if the project is promising. There are sprints for projects where all participants are equal and receive a certain reward if they enter the top 100, for example. Received rewards for such actions
|
|
|
|
|
I have been following this project for a long time. I hope that here I will have a chance to get an airdrop. Because the arbitration did not have time. But this requires finance.
|
|
|
|
|
As time shows, such games do not last long. At first, there is a hype around the project, and then it all calms down and interest in the project disappears. A new game comes out and everything repeats again. So I'm not very enthusiastic about it.
|
|
|
|
|
Now there are so many different projects created on the hype of the multiverse. Personally, I am skeptical about all this, because I see only one video and different project trailers. And at least some semblance of a finished product is not. Maybe in the future
|
|
|
|
|
This is a pointless idea to return assets from a hacked wallet. Whoever has the key to the wallet or the seed phrase is the owner. Therefore, it is necessary to use not the main wallet, but created specifically for such purposes. I mean if you go through testnets and different connections
|
|
|
|
|
This has already happened and this is not the first time I have seen such a topic in the last few years. In particular, the offer of tokens with a religious bias and the offer from the project, I don’t remember the name now. There was a proposal specifically for Muslims according to Sharia. And later nothing more was heard about the project, that is, it turns out that it was not in demand. In my humble opinion, this is a failed idea to mix religion with trade, these are very different things and one contradicts the other.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, these moments are connected and growth begins after the movement of bitcoin. But I also noticed that not all tokens behave like the majority. An important factor is the very technology of the developed proposal from the project. That is, the usefulness of the application, periodic product updates, the involved community that supports the project. Also, a powerful team and development of the project will allow listing on new exchanges and much more.
|
|
|
|
|
All these arguments are certainly understandable and certainly make sense. And on a more positive note, coins with fewer in circulation have a better impact on investment choices. But when investing in a project, I no longer look at this, but at the usefulness of the development for the community. That is, the positive use of the product as a whole
|
|
|
|
I don't know who needs to hear this but after years of being a bounty hunter and keeping a close eye on how bounties are conducted, it's safe to say most projects make the biggest mistake of paying bounty hunters using their native tokens, why do I say so, well bounty hunters don't share the long term foresight as the project to the point of being a hodler to grow with the company but rather see their bounty payment as a service and will sell the tokens for less to get whatever money they can because they owe nobody anything.Of course, for the project to pay using the tokens is cost cutting but if the project is truly slated for the future, paying using non-tokens is a good signal for a strong project.
Going forward in the best interest of investors and the project itself, hope to see "more" bounties being paid with established coins in this industry.
What do you guys think?
I participated in projects that changed the rules when they apparently understood that it would be better for them to pay out not with their own tokens. And they paid for the bounty in stablecoins and the reward was worthy for me personally. But if they paid in their tokens, it would be 5 times the minimum |
|
|
|
|
100% security does not exist anywhere. Of course, you can keep money in the bank, but as history and recent events show, there is a risk. Keeping cryptocurrency on the exchange is also a risky business, and as mentioned earlier, it is better to keep assets in your wallet. I think the best option in our time is not to store everything in one place
|
|
|
|
|
Subscribed to the official twitter of the project and there is not even a hint of an airdrop. Moreover, I have been participating in the company for a long time. You must warn your friends so they don't make a mistake.
|
|
|
|
|
Investing in itself is a risky business. And investing in something incomprehensible to me personally looks completely unacceptable. I will stay with my opinion and will invest in what has already been tested
|
|
|
|
|
Some people are always trying to find or offer what they think are ideas that will supposedly bring prosperity to others. What is offered here is as old as the world and is called a simple word that everyone knows. It's a waste of time
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
