Android Mockup:
14:30 (JacobUX) chaosagent how far along is the code for the android wallet? you said 80% completed?
14:38 <chaosagent> make something original
14:38 <chaosagent> i could have cloned the freaking xml if i wanted to
14:38 <chaosagent> and yes
14:38 <chaosagent> 80%
awesome work
Stop jerking each other off. Every coin has mobile apps.
has mobile apps?
They either have them, or can easily implement one.
Well, by this logic unless they are not using the Bitcoin source code then all other coins => just copy paste projects. I just find it hard to believe someone from the dogecoin community being so adamant on this issue.
Firstly I want say I am not from Doge community.
Now reply your thread:
Bitcoin is a huge innovation.
Litecoin is an important innovation based on the bitcoin, because they first implement the scrypt algo. The community need algo other than SHA256, because of the ASIC.
Proof of stake is an important innovation.
Quark is another important innovation, because of the new algo (mixed algo).
Scrypt jane and adaptive n (vertcoin, cach, etc) are another important innovation, and the community need it because of the scrypt ASIC.
Those coins above requires the devs to come up with some novel ideas to deal with the need of this community.
They are not a mere copy(which is the case of 10-5). If you want to argue, go ahead. The community members are not idiots.
Another important aspect is that these coins mentioned above do not have premine and IPO.
Now Look at the coins you made:
UNO is a mere copy of bitcoin and proof of stake.
PANDA is a copy of vertcoin.
You have made some BTCs and now are leaving the two sinking ship.
Now you (10-5) is copying vertcoin again.
Have you asked yourself:
Do I really care about UNO, PANDA, TIPS, etc?
If I really care, how can I do to better them, than instead abandoning them and create another copy and paste coin?
Why the community need this coin (10-5)?
Is the mobile application an priority in development?
Why you need IPO?
Why other coins can survive for a long time(such as doge) and the coins you copy and paste dies within a short time?
DO I have the ABILITY to do the job that the litecoin, quark, etc did? Rather than coming up with with a copy paste?
bitcoin wasn't premined?
Source?
After you have replied to this with your source to back up your statements you can also answer this.
Even if some of the aforementioned cryptocurrencies are paving the way for new algo's and methods of mining, does that mean to say that they have an all-round successful formula?
You realise that the crypto scene is an opensource world, where people share innovation and provide fixes to issues which other coins have in an attempt to better the community in general. All you are doing, as an individual is bringing all sorts of negativity for no reason. But thats ok..
If what we are doing takes their innovation and builds on it, which is what we are doing, how is there a downside to that? How is there a downside to wanting to provide a more comprehensive offering? :/
I cannot comment on the development side of UNO or TIPS, but what i can say is that i just find it remarkable, that whilst you sit here berating the dev team and anyone involved with the project, you are doing nothing to add value to the world of crypto yourself. It is easy to sit there and slate people, but when you are doing nothing other than thread hopping and looking for an argument it is difficult to talk to you.
If you have questions for myself or any other guys on the team then pop in to irc on #tenfivecoin and give us your opinions and maybe try to contribute something positive or of value.
Show Posts
