|
Ghash.io is a 50%
Fuuarggg
|
|
|
|
If we rebound now it's like SR all over again.
Dus je bedoeld ATM shaniqua ?   |
|
|
|
Looks like that buy went through  Yup! Although it did go down to $550. However, I think when we look back at these charts we'll see that $575 was probably a decent price to buy at. I wonder how many people actually sold @ 550 575 was definitely much better for the sake of liquidity |
|
|
|
Interesting, seeing as your neural-network was insanely inaccurate for the month or so I was watching. And i'm talking about the shortest term data, not the long term stuff.
As Gingermod said, it is a different neural network. Also I don't know what neural network you were watching lol but the one on my site has never in any period of its life been "insanely inaccurate". It has been inaccurate about some major price movements but it has been accurate about major price movements even more often. At any rate, it certainly hasn't ever been insanely accurate. Actually during the time when the price was rising a few days ago it was very accurate. There is a big wall at 560. People are selling off that bought at 650.
The neural network has a buy set at $575 right now. I think you may be right ish. Somewhere in the mid-upper $500s I think is where it's going to stop falling for now. We'll see! Looks like that buy went through |
|
|
|
What are the bad news that makes the price falls?
Where do u live ? FBI selling SR seized coins . Thatīs not true. Legally they canīt sell them on an exchange, only in an auction... And why itīs bitstamp 550 and huobi 600? That makes no sense. WTF ? U talking about legally  MAN ITS BITCOIN ! They can do whatever they want ! What did they do file a report on 170000 bitcoins as evidence ? LOL They are not stupids. They canīt dump that on an exchange cause they will lose money... Only the 10% of that will cost above 500 USD and im sure they donīt want to sell bitcoins at 200 usd. So for the biggest gain they need to sell they in an auction. Wrong again. U did not think about this ? They dont need money . They need bitcoin to crash . Ofc this is nothing but they dont care on what price they are selling Yes yes they need BTC to die ;^) |
|
|
|
Interesting, seeing as your neural-network was insanely inaccurate for the month or so I was watching. And i'm talking about the shortest term data, not the long term stuff. I just tested the trading strategy on BTC-e data and it was actually more profitable: +33% per month instead of +29%!
This is a different algorithm than the on site predictor |
|
|
|
|
Last sell off before moon?
Let's hit 520
|
|
|
|
I just tested the trading strategy on BTC-e data and it was actually more profitable: +33% per month instead of +29%!
Interesting, prices are quite low there (on average) |
|
|
|
In response to the people above. No it will not take 100 million to buy up the hashrate. It might not take 20 million to buy the majority of hardware to mine. This is because the people who make the asics chips (Taiwan etc) can either themselves or sell to others to hash. They can sell at a fraction of what knc or something sells to the public.
Cause manufacturers would sell at a loss, right? If they desired, the Chinese government could order the manufacturers to produce any quantity they wanted. In China, everyone just does as the authorities want. So if the day comes that China actually wants to harm Bitcoin, they will have all the hashrate they want. Sure, it can be fixed after the fact. But why not be prepared? Why not fix this before the fit hits the shan? Why not shore up investor confidence? Speculation is just as much (if not more) about PR and image as it is about fundamentals. Or China could officially 'ban' Bitcoin. But sure yeah let's believe the government will spend multi-millions to destroy our monopoly fun. |
|
|
|
In response to the people above. No it will not take 100 million to buy up the hashrate. It might not take 20 million to buy the majority of hardware to mine. This is because the people who make the asics chips (Taiwan etc) can either themselves or sell to others to hash. They can sell at a fraction of what knc or something sells to the public.
Cause manufacturers would sell at a loss, right? |
|
|
|
It's really not something that can just be ignored. The risk right now might be low, but there is nothing theoretically stopping a government or the world banks from setting up enough hardware to get, say, 99.9% or more of the total network power. It's in the billions for that much, and that's even assuming they do it by honest means. Given what's at stake, it's peanuts. If there is a solution available it should be implemented.
Well if that's what they wanted they could just out right ban Bitcoin, but that's not happening. It would cost 139943424$ just to buy the hardware to control half the network. So yes, it is something that can be ignored because it is not a problem or an impending issue. If you wanna worry, worry about bans and regulation. There is no time limit. And there is no way to know that someone is not gathering hardware right this moment. And again, peanuts. Why wouldn't we fix this? I can assure you, there are no rich entities looking to spend over 100 million dollars to destroy our monopoly money. The thought is asinine and I can unequivocally say that the biggest danger to Bitcoin will not arise from any one of these crazy theories. Fear regulation. Also we can just hard fork. |
|
|
|
It's really not something that can just be ignored. The risk right now might be low, but there is nothing theoretically stopping a government or the world banks from setting up enough hardware to get, say, 99.9% or more of the total network power. It's in the billions for that much, and that's even assuming they do it by honest means. Given what's at stake, it's peanuts. If there is a solution available it should be implemented.
Well if that's what they wanted they could just out right ban Bitcoin, but that's not happening. It would cost 139943424$ just to buy the hardware to control half the network. So yes, it is something that can be ignored because it is not a problem or an impending issue. If you wanna worry, worry about bans and regulation. |
|
|
|
Slight sell off so far...
No surprise there. Only time will reveal the long term trend. |
|
|
|
Iraq was invaded or liberated (depends on what you think and or believe.) by Islam invasion/liberation force today.
We know the area has suffered a lot over the years will this 'surprise' cause a spike in BTC.
Opinions.
No |
|
|
|
I just manually activated your account. It should work now. Not sure why it wasn't working before.
Thanks |
|
|
|
 I've visited the activation link a couple times dpa3v9n+57o9mc@sharklasers.com |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
