|
Any notable whales betting big on Bustabit lately? I feel like the site hasn't been buzzing quite as much ever since PredictableLegacy deleted his account.
|
|
|
|
|
Congrats SkyRevo!
(I still think the BBJ minimum should be 2222 though lol)
|
|
|
|
|
Regarding SwC Poker's lobby chat, players can choose to ignore users by right clicking on their username.
I'd support a slightly filtered chat, but on the other hand, I think what makes SwC unique is it's "wild west" approach online poker.
Things I believe should be filtered:
Yes - Racial slurs, Links, Foreign languages, 4+ messages sent in under ~30 seconds
No - Cursing
|
|
|
|
if there is an affiliate partner trying to increase earnings from self referring, he can easily create 25 accounts
this is one of the worst , semi-shady practices I have seen in regards to affiliate
you cannot be denying people their commission if they do not manage to get 25 affiliate, this is simply not right
I do hope you change it ( or have changed already , since I haven't checked the site)
other than that , a PVP site , provably fair and with a license
many have tried it , nearly all failed - PVP is a danger zone, you need to be very creative and a god of marketing to make it popular
people prefer a simple dice game site or a crypto casino like Stake or Bitsler , but will definitely check the site out , maybe it has what it takes
Hi! We started not so long ago. Some elements of the platform are still being finalized. We are ready for changes if we see that they are necessary. Our main goal is to make the site as convenient and interesting as possible for all players. We take all comments seriously and see what can be used in practice. In the meantime just visit our site and try some games  While I don't agree with it, I definitely wouldn't call the 25 minimum referral threshold "one of the worst, semi-shady" practices regarding affiliates; that title should definitely be reserved for gambling sites that close affiliate accounts that don't maintain a set volume, or cap your earnings per referral (ex. DraftKings). That being said, Zorgo Games is just opening the door for part-time affiliates to create fake accounts in order to artificially increase #'s. In my opinion, a better solution would be to set a minimum payout threshold. By no means am I an expert, but I do have loads of experience dealing with affiliate programs and would be happy to help iron out some fine print. |
|
|
|
Thanks a lot for doing this GSF Happy new years. Happy New Year to you as well |
|
|
|
As a suggest above I agree that the user to also add the Windice gambling site and I still did not found in your website.
I've added Windice and Just-Dice to my list of the best dice sites, plus Thunderpick to my list of the best esports sites. Nevertheless, I noticed that all gambling sites did not have a review yet and probably, you are still working on it. To be honest, it's just a helpful website.
I review each and every site manually - no outsourcing, no guest posting, no outside influence. Every review you see on the site was written by me without bias. To date there are 41 reviews on my site, with [hopefully] many more to come in 2020! |
|
|
|
Ouch, terrible bad beat! I'm rooting for you to win the next one! |
|
|
|
I haven't seen Windice on the Best Dice Site I think you should also consider it. Windice is still the best of several sites that have been listed there.
Bustadice, just-dice and bitdice is not even on the list of best dice site as well, while I can absolutely say that those sites are better than mintdice which is now on the 10th position. I'm not really sure how OP choose the sites to be listed on that leaderboard of the best sites. If it is based on his own opinion then I can say that it is not reliable list although I can see some best site like Primedice, Stake, Bitsler and Crypto-Games. They are obviously the best dice sites in this crypto gambling industry. Bustadice is there already and is currently ranked #2. As for Just-Dice and Bitdice, oddly enough I rarely see them brought up as two of the best dice sites (especially on BitcoinTalk), despite being two of the highest volume dice sites in the world. I do my best to leave my personal opinion out of my rankings. You can read more about my site here and how my rankings work on this page. 👉 How would you rank the best dice sites? Which sites would you add, remove, rearrange, etc.? |
|
|
|
I have a question that in your site i saw there was particular casinos sites have green arrows and red arrows and actually what is that means whether the positions for every casinos can be change down or up and what factors did you considering to decide the casinos can have down or up positions
Those arrows indicate gambling sites that have recently received a significant ranking increase (+10) or decrease (-10, or any drop out of the #1-3 position). To avoid clutter, there is just one positive trending and one downward trending site per category maximum (some categories don't have any currently). The arrows stay active until another significant ranking change takes place. Thanks for the question, I will publish this information somewhere on my site later this week.
I'm replying quick to let you all know that I just added the following line into the "Updated Daily" sub-topic of my "About Us" page: "Ranking adjustments that involve a top-3 site, or involve a site moving +-10 spots are highlighted in green (+) or red (-)."And on the homepage you can now see exactly how many spots/positions a trending site has moved. Ex. " GTBets ↑ +16" means that GTBets has recently received a 16 position increase in the Best Online Sportsbook category. |
|
|
|
I have a question that in your site i saw there was particular casinos sites have green arrows and red arrows and actually what is that means whether the positions for every casinos can be change down or up and what factors did you considering to decide the casinos can have down or up positions
Those arrows indicate gambling sites that have recently received a significant ranking increase (+10) or decrease (-10, or any drop out of the #1-3 position). To avoid clutter, there is just one positive trending and one downward trending site per category maximum (some categories don't have any currently). The arrows stay active until another significant ranking change takes place. Thanks for the question, I will publish this information somewhere on my site later this week. |
|
|
|
|
After considering each and every site suggestion from the past few weeks, I've decided to add MintDice to my list of the best dice sites. Your thoughts?
|
|
|
|
^ Yolodice was already there, I think it also good to know if Windice.io was also there.
Nobody has put in a request for Windice, but I will add it to the list of sites to consider. I really appreciated your work and effort you have been spent on that, probably it will return the effort you have spent someday when you earn a lot from the affiliate referral link you have. In this crypto gambling community, that kind of list is very helpful and it is also good for suggesting others. Thank you for sharing this with us.
Thanks DoublerHunter If you like my site, all I ask is that you recommend it to anyone who might find it helpful! |
|
|
|
Another think which i just noticed that he is using referral links in few of his links. I have not check all but going through them randomly, when i click on binance link it took me to his Referral link. So all of those who will make binance account from this site, he will get referral commissions for that.
Your point is valid and I misunderstood your point earlier. I guess he is basically trying to cash in on the rising popularity of the crypto gambling sites thanks to the anonymity aspect through his personal reviews which could be profitable if the reviews themselves are worth checking out.
I guess he is not focusing on this primarily and is simply a bonus for him probably in the long term.
Well, upon looking at the site I appreciated the effort of the owner. Very organized simple and good looking to our eyes. And also, it is very easy to find those that we need. I also found that there is an affiliate link but that is fine. That is a need to OP to gain and have a better improvement of the OP's website and I think it needs to construct because there are unfinished websites that not already have a review.
Indeed, good job OP.
You say that but to be fair there are many other ranking gambling websites and the only way to make money (which yh it was obvious that this was the reason for creating the website but what was not obvious to me was the revenue stream since affiliations wasn't his best selling point).
To come back to my main point, how successful do you think affiliation links can be in creating revenue when there are other websites which provide the community with the same info? The data can be accessible elsewhere, from sources exactly like this one which are biased in a way or another, essentially there is nothing new this guy provides, and no one would compile this list without seeing profit in it, but where is this supposed to come from when this gambling ranking system is pretty well explored already.
Besides, when the website becomes popular, it will get more visits. This will help him get more advertising contracts. This is a website that benefits for everyone and the revenue gained from it for owner to maintain the site is reasonable. I appreciate his effort.
I admit this site is very helpful for people in finding Gambling sites. I am okay if directed at their referral link because I know that this site does not accept any ad requests. Therefore, in return I also must register via the referral link.
Besides, when the website becomes popular, it will get more visits. This will help him get more advertising contracts. This is a website that benefits for everyone and the revenue gained from it for owner to maintain the site is reasonable. I appreciate his effort.
No, not only that. I noticed this when I clicked a few gambling sites listed on the OP's website it was directed me on ref link. This is expected when someone creating a list there should be an affiliate ref for their own benefits and I understand.
The overall view was very helpful, in fact, I bookmarked the site for the future reference that may I need to search a good gambling site to use.
But there are few gambling sites that did not have a review yet maybe OP was keeping improving the site and probably it will add soon.
GamblingSiteFinder.com is monetized strictly by using referral/affiliate links. I do not have any special deals with any site, nor do I have any vested interest in any site whatsoever. Where an affiliate link is present, I abide to the exact same terms and commission structure as every other honest affiliate. When you see a site ranked #1 on my site, you can be certain it is there because I (and my readers) believe it is the top option, not because I am getting paid extra (or at all) to promote them. I'm not even an affiliate for many of my top ranked gambling sites. In fact, there are multiple categories on my site that are not monetized at all. In cases where I have applied to be an affiliate and have been rejected (which has happened many times), I do not hold a grudge. Again, I simply rank gambling sites in the order that I believe they should be ranked in. My goal with this site is to refer players to a site so good, they never need to look for a new site again. 👉 I want this site to be popular, EXTREMELY popular; the definitive source and "final say" on where to gamble online. I don't care if you sign up through my links (if you have a friend, use his link!), but I do care if you visit my site and then visit another site to get a second opinion. If anything, I want players to think, "This review site says that Casino ABC is great, but let me see where it ranks on GamblingSiteFinder.com first". I want casinos to be proud of their rank and be able to say, "We are the #1 ranked ______ according to GambingSiteFinder.com, so you can trust that we're legit". At the end of the day, I'd rather create a site that everyone trusts, recommends, contributes to, and looks to for information and make very little money from it, than a site that makes good money but is leading players into scams and that I'd be embarrassed to tell people that I built. |
|
|
|
Coming to the rankings themselves, your sportsbook rankings are spot-on(No 1xbit on top finally and Bet365 deserves the top spot) though I only recognized some of the casino sites like Stake, Bitsler etc in the casino site ranking list.
A good collection of the sites you've got there mate. Nice to see no shilling or utter scammy sites included. Although the information presented good, I feel you missed out on some good names. Also, there is no way YoloDice or NitrogenSports should be included in the best dice sites section. You missed out on other unique games like mines, plinko.
I've put A LOT of time and effort into creating these rankings, so I'm glad you guys generally agree that the listings are both honest and reliable. |
|
|
|
Hey, would you consider adding MintDice.com to your list? Thanks, and looking good Great, I am soliciting to add Betbit.com to your list. Great site by the way. How long have you been developing your site? I like the minimalistic nature of the list categories. Very cool and easy to use.
Thank you MintDice, Betbit, and every other webmaster that has emailed me about getting added to my site! I will be reviewing all submissions in the following days and listing the sites I believe qualify. And to anyone reading this, should I publicize which gambling sites have requested to be added to my site? |
|
|
|
OP good job,collection of gambling sites in one single site will save lot of time for a gambler. While I was checking the bustadice review page seems like you didn't update their terms service which was updated on 18.09.2019. People from these countries ae prohibited to use bustadice. Aruba
Australia
Curaηao
France
Netherlands
Sint Maarten
United States of America Source: https://bustadice.com/tosThanks for pointing this out! I have updated my reviews for both Bustabit and Bustadice. |
|
|
|
Then I realized the website was listing fiat ones as well and that section I was looking at was "best online..." instead of "best bitcoin ..." and after I realized that and checked the rankings I realized this place had almost the same rankings as I would have as well, it is a good work done and it definitely has an insanely good listing.
I don't know about the online ones because I don't play on fiat ones but for the bitcoin related ones I would say they listed very well.
Thank you so much for the kind words. Yes, I also rank fiat gambling sites, but I'm doing my best to showcase the best crypto gambling sites as well. |
|
|
|
The design looks great in red, but I expected to find reviews for individual sites. You are simply ranking these sites without providing any sort of explanations in the site itself which is a con in my opinion and this area needs improvement.
Right now I believe I've written ~50 site reviews on the site, with more added each week. GamblingSiteFinder.com is a one man operation and while I'd love to have reviews for every site done by now, I can only work so fast. Unlike many other sites, I write all the reviews by myself - no outsourcing, no influence, no bias. Further, I do my best to write each review as level-headed as possible without trying to influence/lead the reader to join a specific site. There are no flashing buttons on my site, no limited time offers, and no advertisements. Just the best sites, ranked by quality and popularity. Coming to the rankings themselves, your sportsbook rankings are spot-on(No 1xbit on top finally and Bet365 deserves the top spot) though I only recognized some of the casino sites like Stake, Bitsler etc in the casino site ranking list.
Thanks You have no idea how much I appreciate that! |
|
|
|
So is this process of adding site is automated or manual ? Do you first check the site before its being added or you review it later once the site is already added.
The process for adding and ranking a site is 100% MANUAL. I do extensive research/vetting of each and every site prior to deciding whether or not to list them on my site. I do consider every site that is suggested (so please keep the suggestions coming), but I certainly do not list just anyone. I actually believe that I am very selective in who is listed and who is not. As I said in a previous comment, lately I've found myself removing casinos from my site more often than I've been adding new ones. I am asking this because you know there are too many scam gambling sites exists in the market which should not be promoted by any means.
We're definitely on the same page here. My goal is to direct players to a site so good that they never even need to revisit my site (unless they want to try out a new gambling category). |
|
|
|
Game play experience and UI/UX are also things that you should consider when you rank sites.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by game play experience? UI/UX is not a huge difference maker in my opinion, but I definitely do take it into consideration. I will add it to my bulleted list as soon as I can. Search feature include too many results for example keyword 'prime' show wolf.bet, duckdice...
Ugh, I know. I'm not really sure how I can fix that either. I think those other sites appear in the search results because - in the case of a search for "Prime" - I mention Primedice in the reviews for sites like Wolf.Bet, DuckDice, etc. etc. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
