we need this almost 3 hour block solved! someone turn the knob to 11!
I have my turned to 99
|
|
|
Honestly, he knows what he is doing and that is trying to get people to "quit" with his faux-doom and gloom. But you guys play into it by replying and letting his posts get more attention. Every time we respond, it gets put to the top. I guess at this moment in time I am guilty of it but just ignore him if you don't believe what he says and move along.
|
|
|
I am disappointed. No picture of a deep fried bitcoin nor glass of tea with a slice of bitcoin.
|
|
|
I have a question.
What if User3 registers under User2, then User4 registers under User3. Then during some midnight foray into mining, User2 and User 4 decide to split off and register under a neutral pool, thus cutting off the relationship between User3 and User2. Who gets the bonus then?
|
|
|
And I forgot to mention, with the increasing popularity and production thereof of 120Hz-capable LCD monitors, all the more for hasten and quickened GFX development.
|
|
|
Why so soon?
The current 6000 generation plays all today and future games just fine.
How is it soon? It's just an announcement. We likely won't see it till 4th quarter this year or quarter 1 of 2012 at the very earliest and only selected models. By that time, there will be plenty of games coming out push hardware, especially with the increasing multi-monitor setup market. eg: Battlefield 3
|
|
|
Are there parameters or plan to include a failover similiar to that of poclbm?
|
|
|
who will not act like 13 years old pimple faced fuck up.
Mirror lately?
|
|
|
I tried inserting the code from the web page but when I tell it to update my profile I get image removed.
How did you get yours to work?
If you read the profile page where you can edit, it tells you need 50 posts in order to be able to have an image in your signature.
|
|
|
Arctic Silver has a long set in time compared to other thermal pastes. It can take hundreds of hours before it starts achieving it's best results. Also, by the sound of your explanation, you are using a very old method of spreading the paste manually. It has been found that that particular method isn't always best as it leaves room for error by manual spread (re: tiny bubbles/pockets).
Try reapplying by putting a small pea sized (emphasis on small pea, not "regular" pea sized) in the center of the core and allowing the natural pressure of the heatsink and mount compression to spread the thermal paste out. Again, with arctic silver, it will take a long time before it reaches optimal.
|
|
|
Yea I'm not sure what it is to be honest, some hoodoo magic or something. Certainly nothing I've done aside from overclock. It's SDK 2.4; I'll see if I can try SDK 2.1 but I'm weary of the issues of switching SDKs. I'll keep you updated as I try different things.
|
|
|
Guy with the toothpick don't like your camera. Should throw the bitcoin at him!
|
|
|
Guess it's not maximal Tried diapolo's modified kernel as you mentioned and I was able to push it a bit more through phoenix miner 432.5 I may try some other driver versions but seems like this is a good mix so far
|
|
|
Tried it out for the first time and I do see some noticable gains.
5850 @ 970/350 GUIMiner 2011-7-1
poclbm opencl - 410-413Mh phoenix phatk - 408-413Mh
with your modified kern - 415-416.4Mh
Send a little something your way
|
|
|
Yea I first thought my CPU was better than everyone elses but infact the CPU miner uses GPU if available for whatever reason. I can't remember what it was but there is a flag to use to disable GPU usage and then it will go down to useless levels.
|
|
|
...that your 1000MHz figure is therefore more like 425.6 MH/s Yea, it was pretty much around that. I may try some alternate kernels to see if I can't milk a bit more from it but I think it's pretty much topped out.
|
|
|
The current round should be mathematically impossible.
The statistical probability of finding a block at 5.2*1566776 shares becomes 1 [100.00%].
However the site claims no block has been found after 5.6*1556676 [8717385 shares]
At this point it does seem a bit weird
|
|
|
If I am not mistaken, sending extremely small amounts (sub 0.005 amounts in the current client) can require high fees to send across the network in a timely fashion.
I see. Would it be possible to counteract this fee by offering full 8 decimal point once you have at least above 0.02xxxxxx BTC to withdraw or will it still be affected because it's in the decimal points after the 0.02?
|
|
|
|